THE EFFECT OF LASER CUTTING HEURISTIC PRESENTATION MODALITY ON DESIGN LEARNING

IF 2.9 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL Journal of Mechanical Design Pub Date : 2023-08-10 DOI:10.1115/1.4063156
Anastasia M. K. Schauer, Ritesh Bhatt, Christopher Saldaña, Katherine Fu
{"title":"THE EFFECT OF LASER CUTTING HEURISTIC PRESENTATION MODALITY ON DESIGN LEARNING","authors":"Anastasia M. K. Schauer, Ritesh Bhatt, Christopher Saldaña, Katherine Fu","doi":"10.1115/1.4063156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The goal of this work is to study the way student designers use heuristics to effectively design for laser-cut manufacturing methods. With the recent advent of academic makerspaces, digital fabrication tools like laser cutters are a relatively new addition to the classroom. Therefore, there is a gap in formal education or training on these tools, and students can find it challenging to design effectively for them. A study was performed to investigate the way students apply heuristics to redesign laser cut assemblies when received in different modalities. All participants were given an identical lecture on laser cutter heuristics. Then, a redesign problem was presented, and three experimental groups were given the heuristics in different modalities: Text-Only, text with Visual aids, and text with Tactile aids. The novelty and quality of each of the resulting redesigns was evaluated. It was hypothesized that participants would have more difficulty interpreting and applying the Text-Only heuristics, lowering the quality of redesigned solutions relative to the other two conditions. It was also hypothesized that participants would experience fixation caused by interacting with tactile aids, leading to lower novelty of their redesigned solutions relative to the other two conditions. Results showed that modality played a significant role in participants' feelings of self-efficacy after the intervention, as well as in their understanding of laser cutter design skills when responding to quiz-style questions. However, analysis of novelty and quality showed no significant impact of the intervention and varying modalities on participants' designs.","PeriodicalId":50137,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mechanical Design","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mechanical Design","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4063156","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The goal of this work is to study the way student designers use heuristics to effectively design for laser-cut manufacturing methods. With the recent advent of academic makerspaces, digital fabrication tools like laser cutters are a relatively new addition to the classroom. Therefore, there is a gap in formal education or training on these tools, and students can find it challenging to design effectively for them. A study was performed to investigate the way students apply heuristics to redesign laser cut assemblies when received in different modalities. All participants were given an identical lecture on laser cutter heuristics. Then, a redesign problem was presented, and three experimental groups were given the heuristics in different modalities: Text-Only, text with Visual aids, and text with Tactile aids. The novelty and quality of each of the resulting redesigns was evaluated. It was hypothesized that participants would have more difficulty interpreting and applying the Text-Only heuristics, lowering the quality of redesigned solutions relative to the other two conditions. It was also hypothesized that participants would experience fixation caused by interacting with tactile aids, leading to lower novelty of their redesigned solutions relative to the other two conditions. Results showed that modality played a significant role in participants' feelings of self-efficacy after the intervention, as well as in their understanding of laser cutter design skills when responding to quiz-style questions. However, analysis of novelty and quality showed no significant impact of the intervention and varying modalities on participants' designs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
激光切割启发式呈现方式对设计学习的影响
这项工作的目的是研究学生设计师如何使用启发式方法有效地设计激光切割制造方法。随着最近学术创客空间的出现,像激光切割机这样的数字制造工具是课堂上一个相对较新的东西。因此,在这些工具的正规教育或培训中存在差距,学生可能会发现有效地为它们设计是一项挑战。一项研究进行了调查的方式,学生应用启发式重新设计激光切割组件时,收到不同的模式。所有的参与者都得到了一个关于激光切割机启发式的相同讲座。然后,提出了一个重新设计问题,并对三个实验组进行了不同形式的启发式:纯文本、视觉辅助文本和触觉辅助文本。对每个重新设计的新颖性和质量进行了评估。假设参与者在解释和应用纯文本启发式时会有更多的困难,相对于其他两个条件,降低了重新设计的解决方案的质量。研究人员还假设,与触觉辅助设备互动会导致参与者产生固定感,导致他们重新设计的解决方案相对于其他两种情况的新颖性较低。结果表明,模态对干预后参与者的自我效能感以及在回答测验式问题时对激光切割机设计技能的理解都有显著的影响。然而,新颖性和质量的分析显示,干预和不同的模式对参与者的设计没有显著的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Mechanical Design
Journal of Mechanical Design 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
18.20%
发文量
139
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mechanical Design (JMD) serves the broad design community as the venue for scholarly, archival research in all aspects of the design activity with emphasis on design synthesis. JMD has traditionally served the ASME Design Engineering Division and its technical committees, but it welcomes contributions from all areas of design with emphasis on synthesis. JMD communicates original contributions, primarily in the form of research articles of considerable depth, but also technical briefs, design innovation papers, book reviews, and editorials. Scope: The Journal of Mechanical Design (JMD) serves the broad design community as the venue for scholarly, archival research in all aspects of the design activity with emphasis on design synthesis. JMD has traditionally served the ASME Design Engineering Division and its technical committees, but it welcomes contributions from all areas of design with emphasis on synthesis. JMD communicates original contributions, primarily in the form of research articles of considerable depth, but also technical briefs, design innovation papers, book reviews, and editorials.
期刊最新文献
Joint Special Issue on Advances in Design and Manufacturing for Sustainability Optimization of Tooth Profile Modification Amount and Manufacturing Tolerance Allocation for RV Reducer under Reliability Constraint Critical thinking assessment in engineering education: A Scopus-based literature review Accounting for Machine Learning Prediction Errors in Design Thinking Beyond the Default User: The Impact of Gender, Stereotypes, and Modality on Interpretation of User Needs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1