Semantic prosody and semantic preference in multi-word terms

Melania Cabezas-García, P. Faber
{"title":"Semantic prosody and semantic preference in multi-word terms","authors":"Melania Cabezas-García, P. Faber","doi":"10.24989/FS.V41I1-2.1598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multi-word terms (MWTs), in the form of noun compounds (NCs), are frequently used in specialized texts (Nakov 2013). They consist of juxtaposed terms with underlying semantic structures that limit the combination of arguments (Pinker 1989). However, NCs formed by more than two terms have received little attention. This study focused on English and Spanish three-term endocentric NCs used in Coastal Engineering. To explore the presence of semantic preference and semantic prosody in these MWTs, a set of terms was extracted from a Coastal Engineering corpus. The structure of the MWTs was disambiguated and the semantic relations between their components were specified. Verb paraphrases were also elicited from field experts and the web, and then semantically analyzed. The results showed that semantic preference and semantic prosody play an important role in the formation of MWTs and should be taken into account when rendering a text into another language.","PeriodicalId":41240,"journal":{"name":"Fachsprache-Journal of Professional and Scientific Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fachsprache-Journal of Professional and Scientific Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24989/FS.V41I1-2.1598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Multi-word terms (MWTs), in the form of noun compounds (NCs), are frequently used in specialized texts (Nakov 2013). They consist of juxtaposed terms with underlying semantic structures that limit the combination of arguments (Pinker 1989). However, NCs formed by more than two terms have received little attention. This study focused on English and Spanish three-term endocentric NCs used in Coastal Engineering. To explore the presence of semantic preference and semantic prosody in these MWTs, a set of terms was extracted from a Coastal Engineering corpus. The structure of the MWTs was disambiguated and the semantic relations between their components were specified. Verb paraphrases were also elicited from field experts and the web, and then semantically analyzed. The results showed that semantic preference and semantic prosody play an important role in the formation of MWTs and should be taken into account when rendering a text into another language.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多词术语的语义韵律与语义偏好
多词术语(MWTs)以名词复合词(NCs)的形式经常用于专门的文本中(Nakov 2013)。它们由并列的术语和潜在的语义结构组成,这些语义结构限制了参数的组合(Pinker 1989)。但是,由两届以上成员组成的全国委员会很少受到关注。本研究的重点是在海岸工程中使用的英语和西班牙语三学期内心神经网络。为了探索语义偏好和语义韵律在这些MWTs中的存在,我们从海岸工程语料库中提取了一组术语。消除了mwt的结构歧义,明确了各组成部分之间的语义关系。动词释义也从现场专家和网络中得到,然后进行语义分析。结果表明,语义偏好和语义韵律在多句子的形成中起着重要作用,在翻译成另一种语言时应考虑到这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Funktionen von Unsicherheitsthematisierungen in journalistischen Medien The Impact of Communicating Advocacy and Scientific Uncertainty on a Scientist’s Trustworthiness Corpus Approaches to Analysing Uncertainty and Ignorance in Academic Discourse Konstitution von Nichtwissen und Unsicherheit im Sprachgebrauch – ein programmatischer Systematisierungsversuch Beraten und Prognostizieren. Unsicheres Wissen in der institutionellen vs. der massenmedialen Politikberatung
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1