Social innovation and educational innovation: a qualitative review of innovation’s evolution

Karina Maldonado-Mariscal, Iwan Alijew
{"title":"Social innovation and educational innovation: a qualitative review of innovation’s evolution","authors":"Karina Maldonado-Mariscal, Iwan Alijew","doi":"10.1080/13511610.2023.2173152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paradigm of innovation has evolved over the last decades worldwide. The old conception of innovation as technological change has become more diversified and specialised. Current debates express the need to provide a holistic view of innovation, with its pros and cons, including all dimensions of innovation in society and different fields. This paper consists of a qualitative review focusing on three concepts: ‘innovation’, ‘social innovation’ and ‘innovation in education’. This research includes a historical analysis within 1939–2019 as the base period of analysis. This article is based on 108 different sources, which were carefully selected. The analysis was carried out with content analysis in our main sample. This paper contributes to our understanding of innovation more holistically, by discovering how innovation is understood and used, but also by looking at the different stages it has gone through in historical debates and evolutionary trends. This article presents different perspectives on innovation over time and helps to recognise the evolution of the concept of innovation and the emergence of social innovation as a field of its own. Furthermore, the relevance of innovation in the field of education is presented and current debates on the understanding of innovation are situated.","PeriodicalId":46877,"journal":{"name":"Innovation-The European Journal of Social Science Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation-The European Journal of Social Science Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2023.2173152","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The paradigm of innovation has evolved over the last decades worldwide. The old conception of innovation as technological change has become more diversified and specialised. Current debates express the need to provide a holistic view of innovation, with its pros and cons, including all dimensions of innovation in society and different fields. This paper consists of a qualitative review focusing on three concepts: ‘innovation’, ‘social innovation’ and ‘innovation in education’. This research includes a historical analysis within 1939–2019 as the base period of analysis. This article is based on 108 different sources, which were carefully selected. The analysis was carried out with content analysis in our main sample. This paper contributes to our understanding of innovation more holistically, by discovering how innovation is understood and used, but also by looking at the different stages it has gone through in historical debates and evolutionary trends. This article presents different perspectives on innovation over time and helps to recognise the evolution of the concept of innovation and the emergence of social innovation as a field of its own. Furthermore, the relevance of innovation in the field of education is presented and current debates on the understanding of innovation are situated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会创新与教育创新:创新演变的定性回顾
在过去的几十年里,创新的范式在世界范围内不断发展。将创新视为技术变革的旧观念已经变得更加多样化和专业化。当前的辩论表明,有必要对创新提供一个整体的观点,包括其利弊,包括社会和不同领域创新的所有方面。本文主要对“创新”、“社会创新”和“教育创新”三个概念进行了定性分析。本研究将1939-2019年的历史分析作为分析的基期。这篇文章基于108个不同的来源,这些来源都是经过精心挑选的。对我们的主要样品进行了含量分析。这篇论文有助于我们更全面地理解创新,通过发现创新是如何被理解和使用的,也通过观察它在历史辩论和进化趋势中所经历的不同阶段。本文呈现了不同的创新观点,并有助于认识到创新概念的演变和社会创新作为一个独立领域的出现。此外,本文还介绍了创新在教育领域的相关性,以及当前关于创新理解的争论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
15.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: European integration and enlargement pose fundamental challenges for policy, politics, citizenship, culture and democracy. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research provides a unique forum for discussing these processes. It welcomes articles on all aspects of European developments that contribute to the improvement of social science knowledge and to the setting of a policy-focused European research agenda. Examples of typical subject areas covered include •Policy-Making and Agenda-Setting •Multilevel Governance •The Role of Institutions •Democracy and Civil Society •Social Structures and Integration •Sustainability and Ecological Modernisation •Science, Research, Technology and Society
期刊最新文献
Impact of authorship on citation rates: a comparative analysis of top 9999 articles in social science A systematic literature review on collaborative innovation in the public sector Towards a co-creative stakeholder engagement in Smart City projects: a life-cycle approach What matters in the local adaptation of Western social innovation to China: deep core beliefs, institutional boundary conditions or managerial practices? Multinational cooperation on challenging energy technologies: ‘ITER Project’ an EU mission
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1