Chapter Five: Russia and Eurasia

Q3 Social Sciences The Military Balance Pub Date : 2023-02-14 DOI:10.1080/04597222.2023.2162717
{"title":"Chapter Five: Russia and Eurasia","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/04597222.2023.2162717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine failed in its initial objectives and exposed significant shortcomings in several areas of the Russian armed forces, including strategy, command and control, training, logistics and industrial supply. By year’s end, Russia had resorted to using Iranian uninhabited aerial vehicles (UAVs) and direct attack munitions due to the Russian armed forces’ heavy use of its own ballistic and cruise missiles and the continued threat posed by Ukraine’s air defences. The performance of some Russian weapons has been underwhelming. Russia’s tanks and infantry fighting vehicles proved vulnerable to modern antiarmour systems while some air-launched weapons, such as its cruise missiles, were not as successful as they were in Syria. Most notably, the Raduga Kh-101 (RS-AS-23A Kodiak) air-launched cruise missile failed to meet expectations. Russia’s decision to ‘partially’ mobilise shows that the plan to produce a full-time service component, of contractors, failed when confronted with a high-intensity war. The mobilisation process has highlighted institutional and infrastructure shortcomings as well as problems in training. The heavy losses to Russia’s equipment inventory, particularly its armour and artillery, raises significant questions over the direction of Russia’s state armament programme; the country needs to reconstitute its ground forces’ combat capability while they are at war, balancing current needs against existing and future development plans. Both Russia and Ukraine have suffered significant casualties. Ukraine mobilised early, and Western training assistance is intended to produce a steady stream of trained troops, though the training package lasts weeks instead of months. The battlefield successes of Ukraine’s troops have shown the benefits of the training delivered with Western assistance after 2014 and Kyiv’s plan – also with Western assistance – to develop a professional noncommissioned officer cadre. Western materiel support has reshaped Ukraine’s artillery capabilities. But much legacy-equipment remains and ammunition-supply for these will be a key near-term constraint. However, Kyiv’s forces are now able to strike faster and further and have shown the capability to integrate real-time targeting into this process through the use of small UAVs.","PeriodicalId":35165,"journal":{"name":"The Military Balance","volume":"10 1","pages":"150 - 207"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Military Balance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/04597222.2023.2162717","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine failed in its initial objectives and exposed significant shortcomings in several areas of the Russian armed forces, including strategy, command and control, training, logistics and industrial supply. By year’s end, Russia had resorted to using Iranian uninhabited aerial vehicles (UAVs) and direct attack munitions due to the Russian armed forces’ heavy use of its own ballistic and cruise missiles and the continued threat posed by Ukraine’s air defences. The performance of some Russian weapons has been underwhelming. Russia’s tanks and infantry fighting vehicles proved vulnerable to modern antiarmour systems while some air-launched weapons, such as its cruise missiles, were not as successful as they were in Syria. Most notably, the Raduga Kh-101 (RS-AS-23A Kodiak) air-launched cruise missile failed to meet expectations. Russia’s decision to ‘partially’ mobilise shows that the plan to produce a full-time service component, of contractors, failed when confronted with a high-intensity war. The mobilisation process has highlighted institutional and infrastructure shortcomings as well as problems in training. The heavy losses to Russia’s equipment inventory, particularly its armour and artillery, raises significant questions over the direction of Russia’s state armament programme; the country needs to reconstitute its ground forces’ combat capability while they are at war, balancing current needs against existing and future development plans. Both Russia and Ukraine have suffered significant casualties. Ukraine mobilised early, and Western training assistance is intended to produce a steady stream of trained troops, though the training package lasts weeks instead of months. The battlefield successes of Ukraine’s troops have shown the benefits of the training delivered with Western assistance after 2014 and Kyiv’s plan – also with Western assistance – to develop a professional noncommissioned officer cadre. Western materiel support has reshaped Ukraine’s artillery capabilities. But much legacy-equipment remains and ammunition-supply for these will be a key near-term constraint. However, Kyiv’s forces are now able to strike faster and further and have shown the capability to integrate real-time targeting into this process through the use of small UAVs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第五章:俄罗斯与欧亚大陆
俄罗斯对乌克兰的全面入侵未能实现最初的目标,暴露出俄罗斯武装部队在战略、指挥和控制、训练、后勤和工业供应等多个领域存在重大缺陷。到年底,由于俄罗斯武装部队大量使用自己的弹道导弹和巡航导弹,以及乌克兰防空系统持续构成的威胁,俄罗斯已经求助于使用伊朗的无人驾驶飞行器(uav)和直接攻击弹药。一些俄罗斯武器的性能一直不尽如人意。事实证明,俄罗斯的坦克和步兵战车在现代反装甲系统面前不堪一击,而一些空射武器(如巡航导弹)也不像在叙利亚那样成功。最值得注意的是,拉杜加Kh-101 (RS-AS-23A Kodiak)空射巡航导弹未能达到预期。俄罗斯“部分”动员的决定表明,在面对高强度战争时,由承包商提供全职服务的计划失败了。动员过程突出了体制和基础设施的缺点以及培训方面的问题。俄罗斯装备库存(尤其是装甲和火炮)的严重损失,引发了对俄罗斯国家军备计划方向的重大质疑;该国需要在战争中重建其地面部队的作战能力,平衡当前需求与现有和未来发展计划。俄罗斯和乌克兰都遭受了重大伤亡。乌克兰很早就动员起来了,西方的培训援助旨在培养一批训练有素的部队,不过培训计划持续数周,而不是数月。乌克兰军队在战场上取得的成功表明,2014年之后在西方援助下进行的训练,以及基辅在西方援助下培养专业士官干部的计划,都是有好处的。西方的物资支持重塑了乌克兰的炮兵能力。但许多传统装备仍然存在,这些装备的弹药供应将是近期的关键制约因素。然而,基辅的部队现在能够更快、更远地打击,并且已经显示出通过使用小型无人机将实时瞄准整合到这一过程中的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The Military Balance
The Military Balance Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Chapter Three: North America The 2023 Military Balance Chart: Military space assets: China, Russia and the United States Chapter Six: Asia Index of country/territory abbreviations Chapter Five: Russia and Eurasia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1