Optimization of a Multiplex qPCR assay in a portable thermocycler for leprosy diagnosis in point of care situations

Amanda Santos, F. Manta, Fabricio K Marchini, M. Moraes, A. Costa
{"title":"Optimization of a Multiplex qPCR assay in a portable thermocycler for leprosy diagnosis in point of care situations","authors":"Amanda Santos, F. Manta, Fabricio K Marchini, M. Moraes, A. Costa","doi":"10.35259/isi.2022_52177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To optimize and evaluate a qPCR multiplex reaction for the detection of Mycobacterium leprae genomic markers 16S rRNA and RLEP, as well as human 18S rRNA gene as an internal control, using the portable thermocycler Q3-Plus. Methodology: The qPCR multiplex reaction was performed using the commercial kit NAT Hans (IBMP, Brazil) in the portable instrument Q3-Plus (Alifax, Italy). Standard dilution curves of two different samples, a synthetic DNA and DNA extracted from 10 9 M. leprae cells, were used to determine the detection limit and reaction efficiency. Optical parameters such as light intensity, gain, and exposure time were optimized for each target in the Q3-Plus equipment. Results: In the standard equipment, the reactions performed with synthetic positive control showed 94.9% of efficiency to 16S and 93.1% to RLEP, respectively, with a detection limit of 2.29 copies/uL. In Q3-Plus equipment, reactions performed with synthetic positive control were able to amplify 3.67 copies/uL, similar to published results. Reaction efficiency was estimated as 87.12% for the 16S gene target, with a LOD95% of 47.68 copies/uL. For the RLEP target, reactions in the portable instrument presented 86.89% efficiency and a LOD95% of 53.57 copies/uL. Reactions performed with DNA extracted from M. leprae cells showed an efficiency of 95.39% for 16S and 90% for RLEP, with an estimated LOD95% of 1013.18 genome equivalents/uL. Conclusion: Data obtained with the portable instrument show similar efficiency and LOD95% as published results. This represents the first step towards the development of a portable molecular diagnostic test for diagnosis of leprosy in low resource environments.","PeriodicalId":8089,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the symposium: vaccines, biopharmaceuticals, in vitro diagnosis, management, other related themes","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the symposium: vaccines, biopharmaceuticals, in vitro diagnosis, management, other related themes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35259/isi.2022_52177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To optimize and evaluate a qPCR multiplex reaction for the detection of Mycobacterium leprae genomic markers 16S rRNA and RLEP, as well as human 18S rRNA gene as an internal control, using the portable thermocycler Q3-Plus. Methodology: The qPCR multiplex reaction was performed using the commercial kit NAT Hans (IBMP, Brazil) in the portable instrument Q3-Plus (Alifax, Italy). Standard dilution curves of two different samples, a synthetic DNA and DNA extracted from 10 9 M. leprae cells, were used to determine the detection limit and reaction efficiency. Optical parameters such as light intensity, gain, and exposure time were optimized for each target in the Q3-Plus equipment. Results: In the standard equipment, the reactions performed with synthetic positive control showed 94.9% of efficiency to 16S and 93.1% to RLEP, respectively, with a detection limit of 2.29 copies/uL. In Q3-Plus equipment, reactions performed with synthetic positive control were able to amplify 3.67 copies/uL, similar to published results. Reaction efficiency was estimated as 87.12% for the 16S gene target, with a LOD95% of 47.68 copies/uL. For the RLEP target, reactions in the portable instrument presented 86.89% efficiency and a LOD95% of 53.57 copies/uL. Reactions performed with DNA extracted from M. leprae cells showed an efficiency of 95.39% for 16S and 90% for RLEP, with an estimated LOD95% of 1013.18 genome equivalents/uL. Conclusion: Data obtained with the portable instrument show similar efficiency and LOD95% as published results. This represents the first step towards the development of a portable molecular diagnostic test for diagnosis of leprosy in low resource environments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优化在便携式热循环仪多重qPCR检测麻风病诊断点护理情况
目的:利用便携式热循环仪Q3-Plus,优化并评价一种qPCR多重反应检测麻风分枝杆菌基因组标记物16S rRNA和RLEP,以及人18S rRNA基因作为内对照。方法:使用商用试剂盒NAT Hans (IBMP,巴西)在便携式仪器Q3-Plus (Alifax,意大利)上进行qPCR多重反应。采用合成DNA和10 9麻风细胞提取DNA两种不同样品的标准稀释曲线,确定检测限和反应效率。对Q3-Plus设备中每个目标的光强、增益和曝光时间等光学参数进行了优化。结果:在标准装置中,合成阳性对照对16S的反应效率为94.9%,对RLEP的反应效率为93.1%,检出限为2.29 copies/uL。在Q3-Plus设备中,用合成阳性对照进行的反应能够扩增3.67个拷贝/uL,与已发表的结果相似。16S基因靶基因的反应效率为87.12%,LOD95%为47.68 copies/uL。对于RLEP目标,便携式仪器的反应效率为86.89%,LOD95%为53.57拷贝/uL。用麻风分枝杆菌细胞提取的DNA进行反应,16S的效率为95.39%,RLEP的效率为90%,估计LOD95%为1013.18个基因组当量/uL。结论:便携式仪器的检测效率与已发表的结果相似,LOD95%。这是朝着开发用于在资源匮乏环境中诊断麻风病的便携式分子诊断测试迈出的第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cytokines and subarachnoid hemorrhage Cytokines and subarachnoid hemorrhage Evaluation of stenotrophomonas maltophilia biofilm tolerance to disinfectants used in a pharmaceutical industry Evaluation effect of nanocarriers of AmB on pathogenics fungal Establishment 5 doses presentation of the triple viral vaccine without albumin to reduce loss during administration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1