H. Ramlow, R. Machado, A. C. K. Bierhalz, C. Marangoni
{"title":"Influence of dye class on the comparison of direct contact and vacuum membrane distillation applied to remediation of dyeing wastewater","authors":"H. Ramlow, R. Machado, A. C. K. Bierhalz, C. Marangoni","doi":"10.1080/10934529.2019.1647059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This work investigated the influence of dye class on permeate flux and color rejection by comparing direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD) and vacuum membrane distillation (VMD) applied to remediation of dyeing wastewater. The same operating system at the feed side was used and the driving force of each configuration was determined. Reactive and disperse dye solutions were considered, and a commercial membrane was employed. Final color rejection > 90.79% was obtained, and water was recovered at the permeate side (final normalized permeate flux up to 38.92 kg m−2day−1kPa−1). VMD showed higher normalized permeate flux when compared to DCMD. However, the performance according to dye class depended on MD configuration. Reactive dye resulted in higher permeate flux than the disperse dye solution in DCMD. Contrarily, disperse dye solution showed higher permeate flux in VMD. The formation of a concentration boundary layer at the permeate membrane interface was suggested with disperse dye solution in DCMD, decreasing thus the driving force. In VMD, the boundary effect is negligible with disperse dye solution. This result implies that the VMD performance in the textile industry may depend more on driving force rather than the dye class of the dyeing bath.","PeriodicalId":15733,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A","volume":"93 1","pages":"1337 - 1347"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2019.1647059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Abstract
Abstract This work investigated the influence of dye class on permeate flux and color rejection by comparing direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD) and vacuum membrane distillation (VMD) applied to remediation of dyeing wastewater. The same operating system at the feed side was used and the driving force of each configuration was determined. Reactive and disperse dye solutions were considered, and a commercial membrane was employed. Final color rejection > 90.79% was obtained, and water was recovered at the permeate side (final normalized permeate flux up to 38.92 kg m−2day−1kPa−1). VMD showed higher normalized permeate flux when compared to DCMD. However, the performance according to dye class depended on MD configuration. Reactive dye resulted in higher permeate flux than the disperse dye solution in DCMD. Contrarily, disperse dye solution showed higher permeate flux in VMD. The formation of a concentration boundary layer at the permeate membrane interface was suggested with disperse dye solution in DCMD, decreasing thus the driving force. In VMD, the boundary effect is negligible with disperse dye solution. This result implies that the VMD performance in the textile industry may depend more on driving force rather than the dye class of the dyeing bath.
摘要通过比较直接接触膜蒸馏(DCMD)和真空膜蒸馏(VMD)在印染废水修复中的应用,研究了染料种类对渗透通量和去色的影响。在进给侧使用相同的操作系统,并确定了每种配置的驱动力。考虑了活性染料和分散染料溶液,并采用了一种商业膜。最终的阻色率为90.79%,水在渗透侧被回收(最终归一化渗透通量高达38.92 kg m−2day−1kPa−1)。与DCMD相比,VMD具有更高的归一化渗透通量。然而,根据染料类别,性能取决于MD配置。活性染料比分散染料溶液具有更高的渗透通量。相反,分散染料溶液在VMD中表现出更高的渗透通量。分散染料溶液在DCMD中可在渗透膜界面处形成浓度边界层,从而降低了驱动力。在VMD中,分散染料溶液的边界效应可以忽略不计。这一结果表明,纺织行业的VMD性能可能更多地取决于驱动力,而不是染色液的染料类别。