Role of Personal Factors in Epistemological Access to Higher Education: Comparison of Public and Private Universities in Pakistan

Irfan Rasul, S. Arif, M. Nadeem
{"title":"Role of Personal Factors in Epistemological Access to Higher Education: Comparison of Public and Private Universities in Pakistan","authors":"Irfan Rasul, S. Arif, M. Nadeem","doi":"10.46662/jass-vol8-iss1-2021(16-31)","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to find the difference between the perceptions of students of public and private universities regarding relationship of personal factors (comprising four sub-factors (personal competency, participation in university activities, personal efforts for improvement, personal willingness) and epistemological access. A survey was held with undergraduate students of eight universities (4 public & 4 private) in Pakistan. Multistage sampling technique was used to select the sample that targeted 1600 under-graduate students of 6thsemester from two faculties (Information and Technology, and Business School) of 8 universities (4 private and 4 public) situated in the province of Punjab and Islamabad (Capital Territory) in Pakistan. The data were collected through a self-constructed questionnaire during the academic session ‘Fall 2018-2019.’ Data was recorded on SPSS and treated statistically; after confirmatory factor analysis, one-way ANOVA was conducted to find the difference between perceptions of students of public and private universities across 5 factors stated above. The results showed that significant difference existed between perceptions regarding provision of epistemological access among four out of five factors. In three cases (personal competency, participation in university activities and personal willingness for improvement) the perceptions of private students were better than the students of public universities, whereas, the public university students’ perceptions were better in personal efforts for improvement. It was deduced from the results of Pearson correlation that there existed a positive relationship among the mentioned constructs— personal competency, personal effort for improvement, and epistemological access. However, no significant difference was found between students of public & private universities regarding provision of epistemological access in their respective universities.","PeriodicalId":53031,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arts and Social Sciences","volume":"138 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arts and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46662/jass-vol8-iss1-2021(16-31)","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The aim of this study was to find the difference between the perceptions of students of public and private universities regarding relationship of personal factors (comprising four sub-factors (personal competency, participation in university activities, personal efforts for improvement, personal willingness) and epistemological access. A survey was held with undergraduate students of eight universities (4 public & 4 private) in Pakistan. Multistage sampling technique was used to select the sample that targeted 1600 under-graduate students of 6thsemester from two faculties (Information and Technology, and Business School) of 8 universities (4 private and 4 public) situated in the province of Punjab and Islamabad (Capital Territory) in Pakistan. The data were collected through a self-constructed questionnaire during the academic session ‘Fall 2018-2019.’ Data was recorded on SPSS and treated statistically; after confirmatory factor analysis, one-way ANOVA was conducted to find the difference between perceptions of students of public and private universities across 5 factors stated above. The results showed that significant difference existed between perceptions regarding provision of epistemological access among four out of five factors. In three cases (personal competency, participation in university activities and personal willingness for improvement) the perceptions of private students were better than the students of public universities, whereas, the public university students’ perceptions were better in personal efforts for improvement. It was deduced from the results of Pearson correlation that there existed a positive relationship among the mentioned constructs— personal competency, personal effort for improvement, and epistemological access. However, no significant difference was found between students of public & private universities regarding provision of epistemological access in their respective universities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
个人因素在高等教育认识论上的作用:巴基斯坦公立和私立大学的比较
摘要本研究旨在探讨公立大学与私立大学学生对个人因素(包括个人能力、参与大学活动、个人改进努力、个人意愿)与认识论获取关系的认知差异。对巴基斯坦8所大学(4所公立大学和4所私立大学)的本科生进行了调查。采用多阶段抽样技术,从位于巴基斯坦旁遮普省和伊斯兰堡(首都地区)的8所大学(4所私立和4所公立)的两个学院(信息与技术学院和商学院)中选择了1600名第六学期的本科生作为样本。这些数据是在2018-2019秋季学术会议期间通过自编问卷收集的。数据用SPSS软件记录,并进行统计学处理;经验证性因子分析后,进行单因素方差分析,发现公立大学和私立大学学生在上述5个因素上的认知差异。结果表明,在五个因素中有四个因素对认识论途径的提供存在显著差异。在个人胜任力、参与大学活动和个人改进意愿三个方面,私立大学学生的感知优于公立大学学生,而公立大学学生的感知则优于个人改进努力。Pearson相关分析结果显示,个人胜任力、个人改进努力和认识论获取三者之间存在正相关关系。然而,公立和私立大学的学生在各自大学提供的认识论途径方面没有显着差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
ظاهرة الطلاق في منطقة حائل بالمملكة العربية السعودية " الأسباب والآثار والحلول" "التحليل التمييزي للرضا الطلابي عن خدمات جامعة عجمان بدولة الامارات العربية المتحدة" دراسة ميدانية دَور الحَملات الاتصالية للعلاقاتُ العامةُ فِي مُديريةِ الأمنِ العام الأردني فِي التَوعية بِخَطر المُخدِرات اللُّغة الشِّعرية وعلاقتها بالمعنى النَّصِّيِّ من خلال القول بالضَّرورة لدى ابن الشَّجريِّ توظيف هيئة صحة دبي لمنصة الإنستغرام للتوعية بجائحة كرونا: دراسة تحليلية
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1