Abstract IA19: Can biomarkers be used to improve risk prediction models on lung cancer?

M. Johansson
{"title":"Abstract IA19: Can biomarkers be used to improve risk prediction models on lung cancer?","authors":"M. Johansson","doi":"10.1158/1538-7755.CARISK16-IA19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lung cancer kills over 1.6 million people every year, making it the chief cause of cancer death worldwide. The US National Lung Cancer Screening Trial (NLST) demonstrated in 2011 that screening with computed tomography (CT) scans could reduce lung cancer mortality by 20% and total mortality by 7%. As a result, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) has recommended LDCT-screening for lung cancer in ever-smokers aged 55-80 years who have smoked 30 pack-years with no more than 15 years since quitting. However, the NLST study also highlighted several important negative aspects of CT screening in terms of morbidity associated with over-diagnosis, treatment of benign nodules, and financial costs. The study also indicated important differences in the benefit of screening in different participant groups as defined by their underlying risk of lung cancer, highlighting the urgent need to improve and implement risk prediction models when identifying those individuals that are at high risk and most likely to benefit from lung cancer screening. Concurrently, multiple research groups, including ours, have explored the hypothesis that circulating biomarkers can capture information on risk that cannot be provided with questionnaires. In particular, we have evaluated the potential of improving upon the USPSTF lung cancer screening criteria using a small panel of selected tumour-related proteins, data on which will be presented during the conference. Citation Format: Mattias Johansson. Can biomarkers be used to improve risk prediction models on lung cancer? [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Improving Cancer Risk Prediction for Prevention and Early Detection; Nov 16-19, 2016; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2017;26(5 Suppl):Abstract nr IA19.","PeriodicalId":9487,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Biomarkers","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Biomarkers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7755.CARISK16-IA19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lung cancer kills over 1.6 million people every year, making it the chief cause of cancer death worldwide. The US National Lung Cancer Screening Trial (NLST) demonstrated in 2011 that screening with computed tomography (CT) scans could reduce lung cancer mortality by 20% and total mortality by 7%. As a result, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) has recommended LDCT-screening for lung cancer in ever-smokers aged 55-80 years who have smoked 30 pack-years with no more than 15 years since quitting. However, the NLST study also highlighted several important negative aspects of CT screening in terms of morbidity associated with over-diagnosis, treatment of benign nodules, and financial costs. The study also indicated important differences in the benefit of screening in different participant groups as defined by their underlying risk of lung cancer, highlighting the urgent need to improve and implement risk prediction models when identifying those individuals that are at high risk and most likely to benefit from lung cancer screening. Concurrently, multiple research groups, including ours, have explored the hypothesis that circulating biomarkers can capture information on risk that cannot be provided with questionnaires. In particular, we have evaluated the potential of improving upon the USPSTF lung cancer screening criteria using a small panel of selected tumour-related proteins, data on which will be presented during the conference. Citation Format: Mattias Johansson. Can biomarkers be used to improve risk prediction models on lung cancer? [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Improving Cancer Risk Prediction for Prevention and Early Detection; Nov 16-19, 2016; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2017;26(5 Suppl):Abstract nr IA19.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
摘要:生物标志物能否用于改善肺癌风险预测模型?
肺癌每年导致160多万人死亡,使其成为全球癌症死亡的主要原因。2011年,美国国家肺癌筛查试验(NLST)表明,计算机断层扫描(CT)筛查可以将肺癌死亡率降低20%,总死亡率降低7%。因此,美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)建议对年龄在55-80岁、吸烟30包年、戒烟不超过15年的吸烟者进行ldct肺癌筛查。然而,NLST的研究也强调了CT筛查的几个重要的负面方面,如过度诊断、良性结节治疗和经济成本相关的发病率。该研究还指出,根据不同参与者群体的潜在肺癌风险来定义,筛查的益处存在重要差异,强调在确定高危人群和最有可能从肺癌筛查中受益的个体时,迫切需要改进和实施风险预测模型。同时,包括我们在内的多个研究小组已经探索了一种假设,即循环生物标志物可以捕捉到问卷无法提供的风险信息。特别是,我们已经评估了使用选定的肿瘤相关蛋白小组改进USPSTF肺癌筛查标准的潜力,有关数据将在会议期间提交。引文格式:Mattias Johansson。生物标志物可以用来改善肺癌的风险预测模型吗?[摘要]。摘自:AACR特别会议论文集:改进癌症风险预测以预防和早期发现;2016年11月16日至19日;费城(PA): AACR;Cancer epidemiology Biomarkers pre2017;26(5增刊):摘要/ Abstract
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Abstract PO-083: A qualitative examination of race, racism, residential segregation and cancer survivorship among Black and Hispanic women Abstract PO-095: Comparative analysis of breast tumor microbiome in Black non-Hispanic (BNH) and White non-Hispanic (WNH) women Abstract A119: Ethnic and sex differences in exposure to traffic-related air pollutants and lung cancer incidence: The Multiethnic Cohort Abstract A051: Race and gender differences in awareness of colorectal cancer screening tests among recently diagnosed colon cancer Abstract B004: Capacity development among patient navigators to enhance colorectal cancer control in American Indian-serving healthcare facilities in the U.S. Southwest and Southern Plains
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1