Injection Scheme to Reduce Retention and Improve Economics of Polymer Enhanced Oil Recovery

V. H. Ferreira
{"title":"Injection Scheme to Reduce Retention and Improve Economics of Polymer Enhanced Oil Recovery","authors":"V. H. Ferreira","doi":"10.2118/199771-stu","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Polymer enhanced oil recovery (EOR) has been successful in onshore and offshore reservoirs, and is especially promising for heavy oil or heterogeneous reservoirs. Polymer retention, mainly due to adsorption, results in the removal of polymer from the solution, leading to the formation of a polymer-free bank. Thus, determining the retention is a key factor in evaluating the feasibility of polymer flooding. This work investigates a method to reduce polymer adsorption and improve the economics of polymer EOR. This is done through laboratory experiments and reservoir simulation. The experimental investigations consisted of five dynamic retention core floodings in fresh and non-fresh high permeability sandstones. Five concentrations of a HPAM-AMPS in high salinity brine were tested. Two types of experiments were performed: fresh-adsorption, and re-adsorption. Injection of the polymer solution in porous media that had never been in contact with polymer composed the fresh-adsorption experiments. Differently, the re-adsorption experiments were performed in media that had been flushed with the same polymer previously. The experiments indicated a type IV isotherm for fresh-adsorption, while the re-adsorption isotherm was of type I. For a polymer concentration of 1250ppm, the fresh-adsorption was 166.7μg/g while the cumulative re-adsorption was 64.8μg/g. Therefore, reduction of ∼61% may be achieved by pre-flushing the medium with a low polymer concentration solution before the injection of the mobility control bank. Other properties of the polymeric system were measured in the core floodings to serve as inputs to the reservoir simulation model. The field-scale simulation studies evaluated the economic impact of the injection of a low concentration polymer slug to reduce polymer loss during EOR, such as observed in the re-adsorption experiments. The production strategy optimization was composed of eight steps, and targeted net present value (NPV) maximization. The case studied was a heavy oil offshore sandstone field, based on a benchmark. The strategy to reduce polymer retention represented a 4% increase in the final NPV over the conventional polymer flooding. Additionally, risk curve analysis demonstrated the advantage of this reduced-retention strategy over waterflooding and conventional polymer flooding. This work shows experimental evidence that polymer overall retention may be reduced through injection of a low polymer concentration bank prior to the mobility control one. Additionally, through numerical simulation and economic analysis, it indicates that the reduced retention allows for an economic advantage in polymer EOR, which may improve the feasibility of polymer flooding projects.","PeriodicalId":10909,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, October 01, 2019","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, October 01, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/199771-stu","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Polymer enhanced oil recovery (EOR) has been successful in onshore and offshore reservoirs, and is especially promising for heavy oil or heterogeneous reservoirs. Polymer retention, mainly due to adsorption, results in the removal of polymer from the solution, leading to the formation of a polymer-free bank. Thus, determining the retention is a key factor in evaluating the feasibility of polymer flooding. This work investigates a method to reduce polymer adsorption and improve the economics of polymer EOR. This is done through laboratory experiments and reservoir simulation. The experimental investigations consisted of five dynamic retention core floodings in fresh and non-fresh high permeability sandstones. Five concentrations of a HPAM-AMPS in high salinity brine were tested. Two types of experiments were performed: fresh-adsorption, and re-adsorption. Injection of the polymer solution in porous media that had never been in contact with polymer composed the fresh-adsorption experiments. Differently, the re-adsorption experiments were performed in media that had been flushed with the same polymer previously. The experiments indicated a type IV isotherm for fresh-adsorption, while the re-adsorption isotherm was of type I. For a polymer concentration of 1250ppm, the fresh-adsorption was 166.7μg/g while the cumulative re-adsorption was 64.8μg/g. Therefore, reduction of ∼61% may be achieved by pre-flushing the medium with a low polymer concentration solution before the injection of the mobility control bank. Other properties of the polymeric system were measured in the core floodings to serve as inputs to the reservoir simulation model. The field-scale simulation studies evaluated the economic impact of the injection of a low concentration polymer slug to reduce polymer loss during EOR, such as observed in the re-adsorption experiments. The production strategy optimization was composed of eight steps, and targeted net present value (NPV) maximization. The case studied was a heavy oil offshore sandstone field, based on a benchmark. The strategy to reduce polymer retention represented a 4% increase in the final NPV over the conventional polymer flooding. Additionally, risk curve analysis demonstrated the advantage of this reduced-retention strategy over waterflooding and conventional polymer flooding. This work shows experimental evidence that polymer overall retention may be reduced through injection of a low polymer concentration bank prior to the mobility control one. Additionally, through numerical simulation and economic analysis, it indicates that the reduced retention allows for an economic advantage in polymer EOR, which may improve the feasibility of polymer flooding projects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
注入方案减少滞留,提高聚合物提高采收率的经济性
聚合物提高采收率(EOR)在陆上和海上油藏中都取得了成功,在稠油或非均质油藏中尤其有前景。聚合物保留,主要是由于吸附,导致聚合物从溶液中去除,导致无聚合物库的形成。因此,确定储层保留率是评价聚合物驱可行性的关键因素。本文研究了一种减少聚合物吸附,提高聚合物采收率经济性的方法。这是通过实验室实验和油藏模拟来完成的。实验研究包括新鲜和非新鲜高渗透砂岩中5种动态保留岩心注水。在高盐度盐水中测试了5种浓度的HPAM-AMPS。实验分为新鲜吸附和再吸附两种。将聚合物溶液注入从未接触过聚合物的多孔介质中组成新鲜吸附实验。不同的是,再吸附实验是在先前用相同聚合物冲洗过的介质中进行的。实验表明,新吸附等温线为IV型,重吸附等温线为i型。聚合物浓度为1250ppm时,新吸附量为166.7μg/g,累积重吸附量为64.8μg/g。因此,在注入移动性控制库之前,通过用低聚合物浓度溶液预冲洗介质,可以实现~ 61%的减少。聚合物体系的其他性质在岩心注水中被测量,作为油藏模拟模型的输入。现场规模的模拟研究评估了在EOR过程中注入低浓度聚合物段塞以减少聚合物损失的经济影响,如在再吸附实验中观察到的。生产策略优化分为八个步骤,以净现值(NPV)最大化为目标。所研究的案例是一个基于基准的海上重油砂岩油田。与传统聚合物驱相比,减少聚合物滞留的策略使最终NPV增加了4%。此外,风险曲线分析表明,与水驱和常规聚合物驱相比,这种降低滞留策略具有优势。这项工作表明,实验证据表明,聚合物的总体保留可以通过注射低浓度的聚合物库在流动性控制之前减少。此外,通过数值模拟和经济分析表明,降低滞留率可以提高聚合物驱提高采收率的经济优势,提高聚合物驱项目的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Verification of Autonomous Inflow Control Valve Flow Performance Within Heavy Oil-SAGD Thermal Flow Loop Reactive vs Proactive Intelligent Well Injection Evaluation for EOR in a Stratified GOM Deepwater Wilcox Reservoir using Integrated Simulation-Surface Network Modeling A Novel Workflow for Oil Production Forecasting using Ensemble-Based Decline Curve Analysis An Artificial Intelligence Approach to Predict the Water Saturation in Carbonate Reservoir Rocks Characterization of Organic Pores within High-Maturation Shale Gas Reservoirs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1