Fear the Reaper: how content moderation rules are enforced on social media

MacKenzie Common
{"title":"Fear the Reaper: how content moderation rules are enforced on social media","authors":"MacKenzie Common","doi":"10.1080/13600869.2020.1733762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper investigates the enforcement stage of the content moderation process on social media platforms. It argues that the current approach adopted by most platforms is underdeveloped, poses serious human rights issues, and would benefit from a number of reforms. This paper will first explain what the role of the moderator entails and how the enforcement process occurs at social media platforms. The investigation will then turn to the enforcement process itself and identify a number of problems in how content rules are generally enforced including bias in decision-making, an over-reliance on efficiency as a solution, and inconsistent enforcement of terms and conditions. Finally, it will provide a number of suggestions for reform including moving away from the efficiency narrative to consider larger issues in enforcement (which are not so easily solved) such as human rights and rule of law issues and the adoption of a body of precedents as a tool for accountability and empowerment of users.","PeriodicalId":53660,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Law, Computers and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Law, Computers and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2020.1733762","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper investigates the enforcement stage of the content moderation process on social media platforms. It argues that the current approach adopted by most platforms is underdeveloped, poses serious human rights issues, and would benefit from a number of reforms. This paper will first explain what the role of the moderator entails and how the enforcement process occurs at social media platforms. The investigation will then turn to the enforcement process itself and identify a number of problems in how content rules are generally enforced including bias in decision-making, an over-reliance on efficiency as a solution, and inconsistent enforcement of terms and conditions. Finally, it will provide a number of suggestions for reform including moving away from the efficiency narrative to consider larger issues in enforcement (which are not so easily solved) such as human rights and rule of law issues and the adoption of a body of precedents as a tool for accountability and empowerment of users.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
恐惧死神:如何在社交媒体上执行内容审核规则
本文研究了社交媒体平台上内容审核流程的执行阶段。它认为,大多数平台目前采用的方法是不发达的,造成了严重的人权问题,并将受益于一些改革。本文将首先解释版主的角色,以及如何在社交媒体平台上执行过程。然后,调查将转向执行过程本身,并确定内容规则通常如何执行的一些问题,包括决策中的偏见,过度依赖效率作为解决方案,以及条款和条件的执行不一致。最后,它将为改革提供一些建议,包括从效率叙述转向考虑执法中更大的问题(这些问题不那么容易解决),如人权和法治问题,以及采用一系列先例作为问责制和赋予用户权力的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Certification as guidance for data protection by design Regulatory options for vehicle telematics devices: balancing driver safety, data privacy and data security Electronic justice as a mechanism for ensuring the right of access to justice in a pandemic: the experience of Ukraine and the EU Algorithms patrolling content: where’s the harm? Editorial for special issue. BILETA Conference 2022
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1