Editorial for special issue. BILETA Conference 2022

Rory O'Boyle, James Griffin
{"title":"Editorial for special issue. BILETA Conference 2022","authors":"Rory O'Boyle, James Griffin","doi":"10.1080/13600869.2023.2192565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As guest editors of the special issue, we are pleased to introduce to you four papers that were presented at the annual BILETA conference, our first hybrid conference since the pandemic. Held at the University of Exeter, the conference was based around the theme of creativity in legal regulation, and had a large number of presentations about the topic. In her insightful article Coordinating Digital Regulation in the UK: Is the Digital Regulation Cooperation Form (DRCF) up to the task? Dr Aysem Diker Vanberg explores the coordination of digital regulation in the UK and effectiveness or otherwise of the DRCF in achieving such coordination. Aysem argues persuasively that in its current form the DRCF may not achieve the objectives of promoting more coherence and collaboration and concludes that to effectively respond to the challenges posed by digital technologies, coordination between various regulatory authorities must be extended and formalised. Liesa Keunen has written about tax audits and fishing expeditions. Very much a current topic, Liesa outlines that technologies ability to collect, process and extract new knowledge has changed the way information can be gleaned for tax administration. Liesa looks at the issue of fishing expeditions, questioning whether tax authorities might be engaging in these. Liesa comes to a number of conclusions: a) that fishing expeditions are prohibited, b) that they are an intentional investigation with a purpose, and c) that speculation and excessiveness are a distinctive conceptual characteristic of a prohibited fishing expedition. In her engaging article The European approach to damage caused by artificial intelligence enabled by global navigation satellite systems, Ioana Bratu provides us with a description of the legislative proposals issued by the European Commission in 2021 and 2022 in the context of AI systems enabled by GNSS. The article describes the legal bases of liability for damage caused by AI enabled by GNSS and critically evaluates the proposed EU solutions. Lastly, Dr Mehmet Unver assessing healthcare as a socio-technical system, focusing on fiduciary relationships and proposed framework. The article draws a conceptual framework for trust, and considers its relationship with AI and how it is governed under fiduciary law. It takes a socio-technical system perspective, and examines how to govern trust in such an AI driven system. Mehmet argues that a holistic viewpoint can provide a generalisable framework that can enable trust in AI drive socio-technical systems.","PeriodicalId":53660,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Law, Computers and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Law, Computers and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2023.2192565","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As guest editors of the special issue, we are pleased to introduce to you four papers that were presented at the annual BILETA conference, our first hybrid conference since the pandemic. Held at the University of Exeter, the conference was based around the theme of creativity in legal regulation, and had a large number of presentations about the topic. In her insightful article Coordinating Digital Regulation in the UK: Is the Digital Regulation Cooperation Form (DRCF) up to the task? Dr Aysem Diker Vanberg explores the coordination of digital regulation in the UK and effectiveness or otherwise of the DRCF in achieving such coordination. Aysem argues persuasively that in its current form the DRCF may not achieve the objectives of promoting more coherence and collaboration and concludes that to effectively respond to the challenges posed by digital technologies, coordination between various regulatory authorities must be extended and formalised. Liesa Keunen has written about tax audits and fishing expeditions. Very much a current topic, Liesa outlines that technologies ability to collect, process and extract new knowledge has changed the way information can be gleaned for tax administration. Liesa looks at the issue of fishing expeditions, questioning whether tax authorities might be engaging in these. Liesa comes to a number of conclusions: a) that fishing expeditions are prohibited, b) that they are an intentional investigation with a purpose, and c) that speculation and excessiveness are a distinctive conceptual characteristic of a prohibited fishing expedition. In her engaging article The European approach to damage caused by artificial intelligence enabled by global navigation satellite systems, Ioana Bratu provides us with a description of the legislative proposals issued by the European Commission in 2021 and 2022 in the context of AI systems enabled by GNSS. The article describes the legal bases of liability for damage caused by AI enabled by GNSS and critically evaluates the proposed EU solutions. Lastly, Dr Mehmet Unver assessing healthcare as a socio-technical system, focusing on fiduciary relationships and proposed framework. The article draws a conceptual framework for trust, and considers its relationship with AI and how it is governed under fiduciary law. It takes a socio-technical system perspective, and examines how to govern trust in such an AI driven system. Mehmet argues that a holistic viewpoint can provide a generalisable framework that can enable trust in AI drive socio-technical systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
特刊社论。2022年BILETA会议
作为特刊的客座编辑,我们很高兴向您介绍在BILETA年度会议上发表的四篇论文,这是我们自大流行以来的第一次混合会议。这次会议在埃克塞特大学举行,会议的主题是法律法规的创造力,并就这一主题进行了大量的演讲。在她富有洞察力的文章《协调英国的数字监管:数字监管合作表(DRCF)是否能够完成任务?》Aysem Diker Vanberg博士探讨了英国数字监管的协调以及DRCF在实现这种协调方面的有效性或其他方面的协调。Aysem令人信服地认为,以目前的形式,DRCF可能无法实现促进更多一致性和协作的目标,并得出结论,为了有效应对数字技术带来的挑战,必须扩大和正规化各个监管机构之间的协调。Liesa Keunen写过关于税务审计和钓鱼考察的文章。Liesa概述了收集、处理和提取新知识的技术能力已经改变了税务管理收集信息的方式,这是一个非常热门的话题。Liesa着眼于钓鱼调查的问题,质疑税务机关是否可能参与其中。Liesa得出了一些结论:a)捕鱼探险是被禁止的,b)它们是有目的的故意调查,c)投机和过度是被禁止的捕鱼探险的一个独特的概念特征。Ioana Bratu在其引人入胜的文章《欧洲应对全球导航卫星系统支持的人工智能造成的损害的方法》中,向我们介绍了欧盟委员会在GNSS支持的人工智能系统背景下于2021年和2022年发布的立法提案。本文描述了由GNSS实现的人工智能造成损害的法律依据,并批判性地评估了拟议的欧盟解决方案。最后,Dr Mehmet Unver评估医疗保健作为一个社会技术系统,重点是信托关系和拟议的框架。本文绘制了信任的概念框架,并考虑了它与人工智能的关系以及如何在信托法下进行管理。它从社会技术系统的角度出发,研究了如何在这样一个人工智能驱动的系统中管理信任。Mehmet认为,一个整体的观点可以提供一个普遍的框架,可以使人们对人工智能的信任驱动社会技术系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Certification as guidance for data protection by design Regulatory options for vehicle telematics devices: balancing driver safety, data privacy and data security Electronic justice as a mechanism for ensuring the right of access to justice in a pandemic: the experience of Ukraine and the EU Algorithms patrolling content: where’s the harm? Editorial for special issue. BILETA Conference 2022
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1