Introduction: Caste, power and region in colonial South Asia

IF 0.3 2区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY Indian Economic and Social History Review Pub Date : 2004-02-01 DOI:10.1177/001946460404100101
J. Rogers
{"title":"Introduction: Caste, power and region in colonial South Asia","authors":"J. Rogers","doi":"10.1177/001946460404100101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"general accounts of caste that were organised around largely ahistorical anthropological or sociological schemes. For historians, the publication of these two ambitious and useful books will likely serve as a long-standing landmark. There is a remarkable convergence in the periodisation and coverage of the two accounts. Both Bayly and Dirks begin with the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, and see considerable diversity in patterns of social organisation across the subcontinent. They agree that early colonial accounts of caste were uncertain and confused, and did not dominate early British perceptions of ‘lndia’. Both authors date the more intense British objectification of Indian identities in general, and caste in particular, to the 1860s, and give similar accounts of the colonial policies and discourses that reified caste over the following half century. When they arrive at the twentieth century, both writers examine the attitudes of anti-colonial nationalists and other politicians before turning to the political history of caste in the postcolonial Indian state. On the whole the two books tell very much the same story. Despite this similarity, both Bayly and Dirks are quite determined to portray their interpretations as radically different from each other. Bayly, for instance,","PeriodicalId":45806,"journal":{"name":"Indian Economic and Social History Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2004-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Economic and Social History Review","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/001946460404100101","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

general accounts of caste that were organised around largely ahistorical anthropological or sociological schemes. For historians, the publication of these two ambitious and useful books will likely serve as a long-standing landmark. There is a remarkable convergence in the periodisation and coverage of the two accounts. Both Bayly and Dirks begin with the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, and see considerable diversity in patterns of social organisation across the subcontinent. They agree that early colonial accounts of caste were uncertain and confused, and did not dominate early British perceptions of ‘lndia’. Both authors date the more intense British objectification of Indian identities in general, and caste in particular, to the 1860s, and give similar accounts of the colonial policies and discourses that reified caste over the following half century. When they arrive at the twentieth century, both writers examine the attitudes of anti-colonial nationalists and other politicians before turning to the political history of caste in the postcolonial Indian state. On the whole the two books tell very much the same story. Despite this similarity, both Bayly and Dirks are quite determined to portray their interpretations as radically different from each other. Bayly, for instance,
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
简介:南亚殖民地的种姓、权力和地区
关于种姓的一般描述主要围绕着非历史的人类学或社会学计划。对于历史学家来说,这两本雄心勃勃且有用的书的出版可能会成为一个长期的里程碑。这两种说法的分期和覆盖范围有显著的趋同之处。Bayly和Dirks都从17世纪和18世纪开始,并看到整个次大陆的社会组织模式存在相当大的多样性。他们一致认为,早期殖民地对种姓的描述是不确定和混乱的,并没有主导早期英国人对“印度”的看法。两位作者都将英国人对印度人身份,尤其是种姓的更强烈物化追溯到19世纪60年代,并对随后半个世纪中将种姓物化的殖民政策和话语给出了类似的描述。到了20世纪,两位作者都考察了反殖民民族主义者和其他政治家的态度,然后转向后殖民印度邦的种姓政治史。总的来说,这两本书讲的故事大致相同。尽管有这种相似之处,贝利和德克斯都决心把他们的解释描绘成截然不同的样子。比如贝利,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: For over 35 years, The Indian Economic and Social History Review has been a meeting ground for scholars whose concerns span diverse cultural and political themes with a bearing on social and economic history. The Indian Economic and Social History Review is the foremost journal devoted to the study of the social and economic history of India, and South Asia more generally. The journal publishes articles with a wider coverage, referring to other Asian countries but of interest to those working on Indian history. Its articles cover India"s South Asian neighbours so as to provide a comparative perspective.
期刊最新文献
Social categories and colonisation in Panjab, 1849-1920 Civilisations, markets and services: Village servants in India from the seventeenth to the twentieth centuries Introduction: Caste, power and region in colonial South Asia Book Reviews : GYAN PRAKASH, Another Reason: Science and the Imagination of Modern India, Delhi, Oxford University Press, 2000, pp. 304 Book Reviews : KIRIT K. SHAH, The Problem of Identity: Women in Early Indian Inscriptions, Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2001, pp. 194
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1