Counteracting the curvilinear relationship between organizational tenure and career initiative: the role of mentoring and network barriers

A. Rao, M. Virick
{"title":"Counteracting the curvilinear relationship between organizational tenure and career initiative: the role of mentoring and network barriers","authors":"A. Rao, M. Virick","doi":"10.1108/ejtd-02-2023-0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study investigates the antecedents of career initiative, a proactive behavior, whereby individuals engage in activities to promote their career development. The authors first argue that organizational tenure – the length of time employed within a specific organization – will exhibit a curvilinear or inverted-U-shaped relationship with career initiative. In the early years of an employment relationship, career initiative gradually increases as employees overcome the initial challenges of joining a new organization. However, career initiative will plateau and eventually decline as employees struggle to envision further development.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study uses a survey design with data collected from the North American operations of a large global telecommunications company.\n\n\nFindings\nThis study identifies two key mechanisms, both concerning relational context, that drive the curvilinear relationship between organizational tenure and career initiative: mentoring and barriers to networking. Specifically, increased mentoring and reduced barriers to networking both significantly weaken the curvilinear effect.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe results suggest that organizations can promote proactive behaviors through employee mentoring and by removing network barriers, particularly for those most at risk for reduced career initiative: early- and especially later-tenure employees.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nCareer initiative is a valued behavior among employees, but individual-level phenomena can be fostered, or inhibited, by relational context. So, while some scholars have found a trend toward “boundaryless” careers, this study reveals the importance of considering how the boundaries and social context within organizations can create an environment in which employee proactivity can flourish.\n","PeriodicalId":46786,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Training and Development","volume":"115 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Training and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ejtd-02-2023-0020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study investigates the antecedents of career initiative, a proactive behavior, whereby individuals engage in activities to promote their career development. The authors first argue that organizational tenure – the length of time employed within a specific organization – will exhibit a curvilinear or inverted-U-shaped relationship with career initiative. In the early years of an employment relationship, career initiative gradually increases as employees overcome the initial challenges of joining a new organization. However, career initiative will plateau and eventually decline as employees struggle to envision further development. Design/methodology/approach This study uses a survey design with data collected from the North American operations of a large global telecommunications company. Findings This study identifies two key mechanisms, both concerning relational context, that drive the curvilinear relationship between organizational tenure and career initiative: mentoring and barriers to networking. Specifically, increased mentoring and reduced barriers to networking both significantly weaken the curvilinear effect. Research limitations/implications The results suggest that organizations can promote proactive behaviors through employee mentoring and by removing network barriers, particularly for those most at risk for reduced career initiative: early- and especially later-tenure employees. Originality/value Career initiative is a valued behavior among employees, but individual-level phenomena can be fostered, or inhibited, by relational context. So, while some scholars have found a trend toward “boundaryless” careers, this study reveals the importance of considering how the boundaries and social context within organizations can create an environment in which employee proactivity can flourish.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抵消组织任期与职业主动性之间的曲线关系:师徒关系和网络障碍的作用
目的本研究探讨职业主动性的前因,即个体参与促进其职业发展的活动的主动性行为。作者首先认为,组织任期——在一个特定组织中工作的时间长度——与职业主动性呈曲线或倒u型关系。在雇佣关系的最初几年,随着员工克服加入新组织的最初挑战,职业主动性逐渐增加。然而,随着员工难以想象未来的发展,职业主动性将趋于平稳,并最终下降。设计/方法/方法本研究采用调查设计,数据收集自一家大型全球电信公司的北美业务。本研究确定了两个关键机制,两者都涉及关系背景,驱动组织任期和职业主动性之间的曲线关系:指导和网络障碍。具体而言,增加指导和减少网络障碍都显著削弱了曲线效应。研究局限/启示研究结果表明,组织可以通过员工指导和消除网络障碍来促进员工的主动行为,特别是对于那些最容易降低职业主动性的人:早期和后期的终身雇员。创意/价值职业主动性在员工中是一种有价值的行为,但个人层面的现象可以通过关系环境来培养或抑制。因此,虽然一些学者发现了“无边界”职业的趋势,但这项研究揭示了考虑组织内的边界和社会背景如何创造一个员工主动性得以蓬勃发展的环境的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
13.60%
发文量
53
期刊最新文献
Learning opportunity as a critical attribute to attract employees in the context of startups: a text-mining approach Employee trainers’ self-efficacy and performance: the mediating role of trainer preparation The catalytic effect of organizational learning on ambidexterity for firm performance The role of virtual training in implementing Sustainable Development Goals globally High school graduates navigating the workplace in South Korea: challenges, strategies and the role of HRD
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1