(Inconvenient) Truth or Fairy-tale: Sustainability at Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

Sabien Hoekman
{"title":"(Inconvenient) Truth or Fairy-tale: Sustainability at Vrije Universiteit\n Amsterdam","authors":"Sabien Hoekman","doi":"10.53466/ccgl5326.s4shoe1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This mixed methods research aims to understand how staff and students of the Faculty of Social Sciences (FSS) of the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (VUA) experience the sustainability initiatives of the university. Sustainability in organizations is gaining importance now that organizations feel socially responsible for their ecological impact and are held accountable for this impact. VUA claims to have developed policies and practices to try to become a more sustainable organization. This research aims to discover what the frontstage of these initiatives entails and how they are experienced in the backstage by staff and students. This led to the research question: How can the frontstage and the backstage of sustainability initiatives of the VUA be aligned? Methods used to gain an understanding of the frontstage and backstage of the sustainability initiatives of VUA are qualitative ethnographic methods (fieldwork, interviewing, participant observation, observation and document analysis) and a quantitative survey. The data gathered offers insight into the sustainability initiatives of VUA as they are presented to the outside world and experienced in practice, concluding that the faculty and students of the Faculty of Social Science experience a discrepancy between the front and backstage of the sustainability accounting efforts of VUA.","PeriodicalId":21664,"journal":{"name":"Science for Sustainability Journal","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science for Sustainability Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53466/ccgl5326.s4shoe1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This mixed methods research aims to understand how staff and students of the Faculty of Social Sciences (FSS) of the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (VUA) experience the sustainability initiatives of the university. Sustainability in organizations is gaining importance now that organizations feel socially responsible for their ecological impact and are held accountable for this impact. VUA claims to have developed policies and practices to try to become a more sustainable organization. This research aims to discover what the frontstage of these initiatives entails and how they are experienced in the backstage by staff and students. This led to the research question: How can the frontstage and the backstage of sustainability initiatives of the VUA be aligned? Methods used to gain an understanding of the frontstage and backstage of the sustainability initiatives of VUA are qualitative ethnographic methods (fieldwork, interviewing, participant observation, observation and document analysis) and a quantitative survey. The data gathered offers insight into the sustainability initiatives of VUA as they are presented to the outside world and experienced in practice, concluding that the faculty and students of the Faculty of Social Science experience a discrepancy between the front and backstage of the sustainability accounting efforts of VUA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
真相还是童话:阿姆斯特丹自由大学的可持续发展
这项混合方法研究旨在了解阿姆斯特丹自由大学(VUA)社会科学学院(FSS)的员工和学生如何体验大学的可持续发展倡议。组织的可持续性现在变得越来越重要,因为组织感到对其生态影响负有社会责任,并对这种影响负责。VUA声称已经制定了政策和实践,试图成为一个更可持续的组织。这项研究的目的是发现这些举措的前台需要什么,以及员工和学生在后台是如何体验的。这就引出了一个研究问题:VUA可持续发展倡议的前台和后台如何协调?用于了解VUA可持续发展倡议的前台和后台的方法是定性的民族志方法(实地考察,访谈,参与者观察,观察和文件分析)和定量调查。收集到的数据为VUA的可持续发展举措提供了洞察,因为它们被呈现给外部世界和实践经验,结论是社会科学学院的教师和学生在VUA的可持续发展会计工作的前台和后台之间存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Growing In A Minefield; the politics of organic agriculture, food security, and sustainable development in Lebanon (Inconvenient) Truth or Fairy-tale: Sustainability at Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Circular cities: Analyzing bottom-up initiatives for making Amsterdam more circular Influence of UV absorbing films on yield, quality and pest activity of protected strawberry crops The True Cost of Sugar: Economic trade-offs in conventional, organic and Fairtrade sugarcane and sugar beet production.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1