Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.53466/ccgl5326.s4sham1
Viviane Hamans
On a global level, debates on food security and sustainable development of food systems have shifted from merely economic debates, focusing on a trading rationale, to social debates discussing the underlying social and political relationships of food systems. Locally, the manifestation of the Lebanese political-economic system and the current crisis context have led to increased food insecurity in Lebanon. Although concepts like sustainability, resilience, and agency are centralized and recognized in international policy frameworks, Lebanese citizens are limited to act to contribute to the sustainable development of a food secure Lebanon (American University of Beirut, 2020). While acknowledgment and recognition of local knowledge and realities are needed for socially and culturally appropriate programs, it is unclear whether local Lebanese initiatives share the same interpretation or meaning of the concepts central in the policy-driven, top-down governed development programs. This research paper pays attention to food systems as socio-political systems through an ethnographic account of local agricultural initiatives that respond to food insecurity in Tripoli, Lebanon, in the context of the Lebanese crisis. The responses manifested in a particular set of social relationships structured by values of productivity, cooperation, and independence. Their future-making practices can be understood as a motion of ‘survival navigation’ within a metaphorical ‘minefield’ whereby the interwovenness of past, present, and future problematizes the exercising forces needed for the coming into being of a better future. The unpacked meaning and analysis of ‘sustainability’, ‘resilience’, and ‘agency’ shows they are experienced as part of socio-political reality, and reveals an ideological gap and a gap at the level of sustainable development practice. The Commons paradigm offers a framework of thinking to bridge this gap by acknowledging that the social world is grounded in the material world and that agency manifests in socio-political relationships around access to resources.
{"title":"Growing In A Minefield; the politics of organic agriculture, food security, and\u0000 sustainable development in Lebanon","authors":"Viviane Hamans","doi":"10.53466/ccgl5326.s4sham1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.53466/ccgl5326.s4sham1","url":null,"abstract":"On a global level, debates on food security and sustainable development of food systems have shifted from merely economic debates, focusing on a trading rationale, to social debates discussing the underlying social and political relationships of food systems. Locally, the manifestation of the Lebanese political-economic system and the current crisis context have led to increased food insecurity in Lebanon. Although concepts like sustainability, resilience, and agency are centralized and recognized in international policy frameworks, Lebanese citizens are limited to act to contribute to the sustainable development of a food secure Lebanon (American University of Beirut, 2020). While acknowledgment and recognition of local knowledge and realities are needed for socially and culturally appropriate programs, it is unclear whether local Lebanese initiatives share the same interpretation or meaning of the concepts central in the policy-driven, top-down governed development programs. This research paper pays attention to food systems as socio-political systems through an ethnographic account of local agricultural initiatives that respond to food insecurity in Tripoli, Lebanon, in the context of the Lebanese crisis. The responses manifested in a particular set of social relationships structured by values of productivity, cooperation, and independence. Their future-making practices can be understood as a motion of ‘survival navigation’ within a metaphorical ‘minefield’ whereby the interwovenness of past, present, and future problematizes the exercising forces needed for the coming into being of a better future. The unpacked meaning and analysis of ‘sustainability’, ‘resilience’, and ‘agency’ shows they are experienced as part of socio-political reality, and reveals an ideological gap and a gap at the level of sustainable development practice. The Commons paradigm offers a framework of thinking to bridge this gap by acknowledging that the social world is grounded in the material world and that agency manifests in socio-political relationships around access to resources.","PeriodicalId":21664,"journal":{"name":"Science for Sustainability Journal","volume":"130 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77256090","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.53466/ccgl5326.s4shoe1
Sabien Hoekman
This mixed methods research aims to understand how staff and students of the Faculty of Social Sciences (FSS) of the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (VUA) experience the sustainability initiatives of the university. Sustainability in organizations is gaining importance now that organizations feel socially responsible for their ecological impact and are held accountable for this impact. VUA claims to have developed policies and practices to try to become a more sustainable organization. This research aims to discover what the frontstage of these initiatives entails and how they are experienced in the backstage by staff and students. This led to the research question: How can the frontstage and the backstage of sustainability initiatives of the VUA be aligned? Methods used to gain an understanding of the frontstage and backstage of the sustainability initiatives of VUA are qualitative ethnographic methods (fieldwork, interviewing, participant observation, observation and document analysis) and a quantitative survey. The data gathered offers insight into the sustainability initiatives of VUA as they are presented to the outside world and experienced in practice, concluding that the faculty and students of the Faculty of Social Science experience a discrepancy between the front and backstage of the sustainability accounting efforts of VUA.
{"title":"(Inconvenient) Truth or Fairy-tale: Sustainability at Vrije Universiteit\u0000 Amsterdam","authors":"Sabien Hoekman","doi":"10.53466/ccgl5326.s4shoe1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.53466/ccgl5326.s4shoe1","url":null,"abstract":"This mixed methods research aims to understand how staff and students of the Faculty of Social Sciences (FSS) of the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (VUA) experience the sustainability initiatives of the university. Sustainability in organizations is gaining importance now that organizations feel socially responsible for their ecological impact and are held accountable for this impact. VUA claims to have developed policies and practices to try to become a more sustainable organization. This research aims to discover what the frontstage of these initiatives entails and how they are experienced in the backstage by staff and students. This led to the research question: How can the frontstage and the backstage of sustainability initiatives of the VUA be aligned? Methods used to gain an understanding of the frontstage and backstage of the sustainability initiatives of VUA are qualitative ethnographic methods (fieldwork, interviewing, participant observation, observation and document analysis) and a quantitative survey. The data gathered offers insight into the sustainability initiatives of VUA as they are presented to the outside world and experienced in practice, concluding that the faculty and students of the Faculty of Social Science experience a discrepancy between the front and backstage of the sustainability accounting efforts of VUA.","PeriodicalId":21664,"journal":{"name":"Science for Sustainability Journal","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80383729","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-01-01DOI: 10.53466/dnga3052.s4selk
Evgeniya Elkina
Circular economy is becoming ever more widespread sustainable concept for promoting efficient resource usage; Amsterdam is one of the first cities to implement this approach to solve waste management problems. While the circular transition is mostly examined from a top-down perspective, the role of bottom-up initiatives is often left unstudied. This article determines the contribution of bottom-up initiatives to Amsterdam’s circular transition by assessing their environmental, economic, social impact together with their commitment to circularity. The study utilizes the survey method followed by a statistical analysis to investigate the influence of such initiatives on public awareness, involvement, and behavioral change. The content analysis of initiatives’ official documentation and news articles allows revealing the environmental and economic impact and analyzing initiatives’ commitment to circularity. The results communicate that bottom-up initiatives mostly create an economic value and positively affect citizens’ involvement. However, the environmental impact, the influence on public awareness and partly on behavioral change is insignificant due to their small local scale and inconsistency between the declared and actual priorities. Such initiatives might still serve as trendsetters thereby indirectly tackling waste problem and facilitating Amsterdam’s circular transition.
{"title":"Circular cities: Analyzing bottom-up initiatives for making Amsterdam more circular","authors":"Evgeniya Elkina","doi":"10.53466/dnga3052.s4selk","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.53466/dnga3052.s4selk","url":null,"abstract":"Circular economy is becoming ever more widespread sustainable concept for promoting efficient resource usage; Amsterdam is one of the first cities to implement this approach to solve waste management problems. While the circular transition is mostly examined from a top-down perspective, the role of bottom-up initiatives is often left unstudied. This article determines the contribution of bottom-up initiatives to Amsterdam’s circular transition by assessing their environmental, economic, social impact together with their commitment to circularity. The study utilizes the survey method followed by a statistical analysis to investigate the influence of such initiatives on public awareness, involvement, and behavioral change. The content analysis of initiatives’ official documentation and news articles allows revealing the environmental and economic impact and analyzing initiatives’ commitment to circularity. The results communicate that bottom-up initiatives mostly create an economic value and positively affect citizens’ involvement. However, the environmental impact, the influence on public awareness and partly on behavioral change is insignificant due to their small local scale and inconsistency between the declared and actual priorities. Such initiatives might still serve as trendsetters thereby indirectly tackling waste problem and facilitating Amsterdam’s circular transition.","PeriodicalId":21664,"journal":{"name":"Science for Sustainability Journal","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72694611","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-01-01DOI: 10.53466/ccgl5326.s4skum2
I. Kumar
The cultivated strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) is a highly valuable and economically crucial soft fruit crop. Strawberries are famous due to their particular flavour, colour, quality, and appearance, as well as their nutritional value. They are one of the top ten crops cultivated and consumed in the UK. However, due to the limited season for cultivation but all year demand, there is still a high level of imported fresh produce from other prominent strawberry producing countries both in Europe and worldwide. There is a potential to develop new horticultural films with in-creased UV absorption to reduce pest and disease incidence, improve the yield of strawberries grown under protection and extend the strawberry season in the UK further; this is because insect visualisation and host recognition are influenced by UV radiation, and the life cycle of many fun-gal diseases relies on UV light. Therefore, an experiment was set-up to study the effect of four newly developed UV absorbing horticultural films (ranging from complete UV transmission to complete UV blocking) on strawberry plant growth, yield and fruit quality, as well as pest infestation. Overall, plant growth and fruit quality were largely unaffected by UV absorbance. Still, the yield was enhanced, and the thrips population significantly reduced, which are beneficial outcomes for the strawberry industry. The partially UV absorbing film (UV 370) performed considerably better than other films regarding fruit quality and yield. The completely UV blocking film (UV 400) was serving better initially but degraded after the second peak harvest resulted in reduced performance later. If the UV 400 film could be stabilised to prevent degradation, there is the potential to improve strawberry fruit yield and quality.
栽培草莓(Fragaria x ananassa Duch.)是一种高价值和经济上至关重要的软果作物。草莓因其独特的味道、颜色、质量和外观以及营养价值而闻名。它们是英国种植和消费最多的十大作物之一。然而，由于种植季节有限，但全年都有需求，从欧洲和世界其他主要草莓生产国进口的新鲜农产品仍然很高。在英国，有潜力开发新的园艺膜，增加紫外线吸收，以减少病虫害的发生，提高保护草莓的产量，并进一步延长草莓的季节;这是因为昆虫的视觉和宿主识别受到紫外线辐射的影响，许多真菌疾病的生命周期依赖于紫外线。为此，本试验研究了新开发的4种紫外线吸收园艺膜(从完全透射紫外线到完全阻隔紫外线)对草莓植株生长、产量、果实品质和害虫侵染的影响。总的来说，植物生长和果实品质在很大程度上不受紫外线吸收的影响。尽管如此，产量得到了提高，蓟马种群数量显著减少，这对草莓产业是有利的结果。部分紫外吸收膜(UV 370)在果实品质和产量方面表现明显优于其他膜。完全阻挡紫外线的薄膜(UV 400)最初效果较好，但在第二次高峰收获后性能下降。如果UV 400薄膜能够稳定以防止降解，就有可能提高草莓的产量和质量。
{"title":"Influence of UV absorbing films on yield, quality and pest activity of protected strawberry crops","authors":"I. Kumar","doi":"10.53466/ccgl5326.s4skum2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.53466/ccgl5326.s4skum2","url":null,"abstract":"The cultivated strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) is a highly valuable and economically crucial soft fruit crop. Strawberries are famous due to their particular flavour, colour, quality, and appearance, as well as their nutritional value. They are one of the top ten crops cultivated and consumed in the UK. However, due to the limited season for cultivation but all year demand, there is still a high level of imported fresh produce from other prominent strawberry producing countries both in Europe and worldwide. There is a potential to develop new horticultural films with in-creased UV absorption to reduce pest and disease incidence, improve the yield of strawberries grown under protection and extend the strawberry season in the UK further; this is because insect visualisation and host recognition are influenced by UV radiation, and the life cycle of many fun-gal diseases relies on UV light. Therefore, an experiment was set-up to study the effect of four newly developed UV absorbing horticultural films (ranging from complete UV transmission to complete UV blocking) on strawberry plant growth, yield and fruit quality, as well as pest infestation. Overall, plant growth and fruit quality were largely unaffected by UV absorbance. Still, the yield was enhanced, and the thrips population significantly reduced, which are beneficial outcomes for the strawberry industry. The partially UV absorbing film (UV 370) performed considerably better than other films regarding fruit quality and yield. The completely UV blocking film (UV 400) was serving better initially but degraded after the second peak harvest resulted in reduced performance later. If the UV 400 film could be stabilised to prevent degradation, there is the potential to improve strawberry fruit yield and quality.","PeriodicalId":21664,"journal":{"name":"Science for Sustainability Journal","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75022896","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-01-01DOI: 10.53466/ccgl5326.s4sden
Joris den Boer
Sugar is an important economic commodity that is produced and consumed around the world. The impacts of different production methods differ on social, economic and environmental aspects. This research focuses on the economic trade- offs in conventional, organic and Fairtrade sugarcane production in India and sugar beet production in the Netherlands. Previous research provides insights into single production methods, but a complete comparison between different production methods is currently lacking. Data was collected using both literature research and interviews in the Netherlands and India. After developing a Multi-Criteria Analysis, it is concluded that organic sugarcane and Fairtrade sugarcane rank slightly higher than conventional sugarcane on the economic criteria. However, conventional sugar beet and organic sugar beet rank higher on all economic aspects, with conventional sugar beet ranking the highest. The main differences between the production methods can be seen in the innovation, and to a lesser extent the in the production.
{"title":"The True Cost of Sugar: Economic trade-offs in conventional, organic and Fairtrade sugarcane and sugar beet production.","authors":"Joris den Boer","doi":"10.53466/ccgl5326.s4sden","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.53466/ccgl5326.s4sden","url":null,"abstract":"Sugar is an important economic commodity that is produced and consumed around the world. The impacts of different production methods differ on social, economic and environmental aspects. This research focuses on the economic trade- offs in conventional, organic and Fairtrade sugarcane production in India and sugar beet production in the Netherlands. Previous research provides insights into single production methods, but a complete comparison between different production methods is currently lacking. Data was collected using both literature research and interviews in the Netherlands and India. After developing a Multi-Criteria Analysis, it is concluded that organic sugarcane and Fairtrade sugarcane rank slightly higher than conventional sugarcane on the economic criteria. However, conventional sugar beet and organic sugar beet rank higher on all economic aspects, with conventional sugar beet ranking the highest. The main differences between the production methods can be seen in the innovation, and to a lesser extent the in the production.","PeriodicalId":21664,"journal":{"name":"Science for Sustainability Journal","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80493728","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-01-01DOI: 10.53466/ccgl5326.s4skum1
I. Kumar
"For the last many decades, the EU’s intensified agriculture model has shown a significant trend to reinforce the economy while feeding the world. The Netherlands is one of the EU’s member follow neoliberalism in agriculture by importing cheap animal feed & fertilisers and exports meat & dairy products. The intensification of Dutch agriculture results from solid collaborations among the Agriculture Innovation System actors (AIS). Nitrogen (N), being one of the essential elements of building blocks of life, is a vital nutrient, an indicator for global food security, and supports agriculture’s intensification. N in fertilisers and feedstock’s intensive use comes with the consequences of wicked problems such as ammonia (NH3) emissions in the air and nitrates (NOX) leaching in the soil. Around two-thirds of the Dutch farmlands and 80% of the crop, fertiliser is used for livestock cultivation. The Netherlands is famous for technological innovations worldwide (in terms of niche innovation); however, digitalisation is still an ‘alien’ term for Dutch farmers. A lack of landscapelevel technology implementation, weak policy infrastruture for monitoring pollution dynamics is one of the leading causes of the nitrogen crisis in the Netherlands. The N-crisis is causing distress in farmers, and the government is struggling for effective policy implementation. Therefore, there is a need for state-of-art initiatives which utilise maximum involvement of technology and the environment with minimum (government) efforts. This holistic and explorative cast-study research highlights the challenges and consequences of the Digitalisation of Agriculture Innovation System (DAIS) to resolve the Dutch N-crisis. Different aspects of research covered are 1) to address associates knowledge gaps, 2) analyse the cause of complex N-crisis in the Netherlands, 3) to analyse the current state of Dutch policy infrastructure & challenges and 4) to analyse present & future trend of DAIS transformations. This will ultimately lead to technology and policy recommendation supporting multi- stakeholders collaboration, creating a market of Nitrogen Trading System (NTS) at multiple levels and using digitalisation as a key for establishing Sustainable System Transformation (SST)."
{"title":"Digitalisation of Dutch Agriculture: Implications of reducing Nitrogen pollution from livestock cultivation","authors":"I. Kumar","doi":"10.53466/ccgl5326.s4skum1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.53466/ccgl5326.s4skum1","url":null,"abstract":"\"For the last many decades, the EU’s intensified agriculture model has shown a significant trend to reinforce the economy while feeding the world. The Netherlands is one of the EU’s member follow neoliberalism in agriculture by importing cheap animal feed & fertilisers and exports meat & dairy products. The intensification of Dutch agriculture results from solid collaborations among the Agriculture Innovation System actors (AIS). Nitrogen (N), being one of the essential elements of building blocks of life, is a vital nutrient, an indicator for global food security, and supports agriculture’s intensification. N in fertilisers and feedstock’s intensive use comes with the consequences of wicked problems such as ammonia (NH3) emissions in the air and nitrates (NOX) leaching in the soil. Around two-thirds of the Dutch farmlands and 80% of the crop, fertiliser is used for livestock cultivation. The Netherlands is famous for technological innovations worldwide (in terms of niche innovation); however, digitalisation is still an ‘alien’ term for Dutch farmers. A lack of landscapelevel technology implementation, weak policy infrastruture for monitoring pollution dynamics is one of the leading causes of the nitrogen crisis in the Netherlands. The N-crisis is causing distress in farmers, and the government is struggling for effective policy implementation. Therefore, there is a need for state-of-art initiatives which utilise maximum involvement of technology and the environment with minimum (government) efforts. This holistic and explorative cast-study research highlights the challenges and consequences of the Digitalisation of Agriculture Innovation System (DAIS) to resolve the Dutch N-crisis. Different aspects of research covered are 1) to address associates knowledge gaps, 2) analyse the cause of complex N-crisis in the Netherlands, 3) to analyse the current state of Dutch policy infrastructure & challenges and 4) to analyse present & future trend of DAIS transformations. This will ultimately lead to technology and policy recommendation supporting multi- stakeholders collaboration, creating a market of Nitrogen Trading System (NTS) at multiple levels and using digitalisation as a key for establishing Sustainable System Transformation (SST).\"","PeriodicalId":21664,"journal":{"name":"Science for Sustainability Journal","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83220909","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-01-01DOI: 10.53466/dnga3052.s4sgje
Knut Anders Gjersoe
As the Brundtland (1987) described, the ability of future generations to meet their needs will depend on how sustainable we can make our economy today. Now more than 20 years later we can observe initiatives aimed at sustainability across industries and borders. Sustainable development aims to meet the needs of the present without compromising the ability for future generations to meet needs. Understanding how organizational members thrive or stagnate in work related to sustainability can give us understanding needed for enabling such organizations to improve and prosper. Hence by researching what practices makes organizational members motivated to endure challenges in sustainability-focused organizations, beneficial insights can be contributed for the continuity of such organizations. This qualitive study with (participant) observation and interviews, aims to provide a deep comprehension and map aspects related to the motivation factors in mentioned work settings. The outcome of the research is related to theory on research that has the key words: sustainability, motivation and volunteering. The significance of the research is to discuss and propose what beneficial solutions can be derived out of the observed scenarios to contribute to sustainability focused organizational project work.
{"title":"Progression & Motivation - Working through challenges in sustainability focused project organizations","authors":"Knut Anders Gjersoe","doi":"10.53466/dnga3052.s4sgje","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.53466/dnga3052.s4sgje","url":null,"abstract":"As the Brundtland (1987) described, the ability of future generations to meet their needs will depend on how sustainable we can make our economy today. Now more than 20 years later we can observe initiatives aimed at sustainability across industries and borders. Sustainable development aims to meet the needs of the present without compromising the ability for future generations to meet needs. Understanding how organizational members thrive or stagnate in work related to sustainability can give us understanding needed for enabling such organizations to improve and prosper. Hence by researching what practices makes organizational members motivated to endure challenges in sustainability-focused organizations, beneficial insights can be contributed for the continuity of such organizations. This qualitive study with (participant) observation and interviews, aims to provide a deep comprehension and map aspects related to the motivation factors in mentioned work settings. The outcome of the research is related to theory on research that has the key words: sustainability, motivation and volunteering. The significance of the research is to discuss and propose what beneficial solutions can be derived out of the observed scenarios to contribute to sustainability focused organizational project work.","PeriodicalId":21664,"journal":{"name":"Science for Sustainability Journal","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88533050","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-01-01DOI: 10.53466/veri6053.s4srei
Filipa Reis, Shuangyue Wu, Khrystyna Potyatynnyk
Since the 1950s, the production of plastic surpassed the production of almost every other material. If the trends in plastic production - and oil consumption - continue at its current rate, estimates are that by 2050 there will be about 12 billion tonnes of plastic litter in the environment and the plastic industry will be responsible for 20% of the world’s total oil consumption. Globally, management of the increasingly large quantity of plastic waste has been challenging, with only 9% of plastic being recycled and almost 80% of plastic being either dumped, disposed in landfills or littered in the environment, resulting in an estimated 4 to 12 million metric tonnes (Mt) of plastic waste in the oceans annually. The improvement of solid waste management systems has not accompanied the rapid growth of plastic production, creating market inefficiencies with serious downstream effects on human health, quality of life and the environment – in particular marine life. Ultimately, there is no “one size-fits-all” solution to the current plastic problem. Governments, businesses and individuals all have a major role to play in paving the way for a circular economy with more sustainable patterns of consumption and a more efficient design of plastic products
{"title":"Life in Plastic, It’s not Fantastic: The Economics of Plastic Pollution","authors":"Filipa Reis, Shuangyue Wu, Khrystyna Potyatynnyk","doi":"10.53466/veri6053.s4srei","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.53466/veri6053.s4srei","url":null,"abstract":"Since the 1950s, the production of plastic surpassed the production of almost every other material. If the trends in plastic production - and oil consumption - continue at its current rate, estimates are that by 2050 there will be about 12 billion tonnes of plastic litter in the environment and the plastic industry will be responsible for 20% of the world’s total oil consumption. Globally, management of the increasingly large quantity of plastic waste has been challenging, with only 9% of plastic being recycled and almost 80% of plastic being either dumped, disposed in landfills or littered in the environment, resulting in an estimated 4 to 12 million metric tonnes (Mt) of plastic waste in the oceans annually. The improvement of solid waste management systems has not accompanied the rapid growth of plastic production, creating market inefficiencies with serious downstream effects on human health, quality of life and the environment – in particular marine life. Ultimately, there is no “one size-fits-all” solution to the current plastic problem. Governments, businesses and individuals all have a major role to play in paving the way for a circular economy with more sustainable patterns of consumption and a more efficient design of plastic products","PeriodicalId":21664,"journal":{"name":"Science for Sustainability Journal","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89848917","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：