Perancangan UI/UX E-Tracer Study UNIROW dengan Menggunakan Metode Doubel Diamond

Mellynda Oktaviana, Alfian Nurlifa, A. Suryanto, Fitroh Amaluddin
{"title":"Perancangan UI/UX E-Tracer Study UNIROW dengan Menggunakan Metode Doubel Diamond","authors":"Mellynda Oktaviana, Alfian Nurlifa, A. Suryanto, Fitroh Amaluddin","doi":"10.29408/jit.v6i1.7397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently, at PGRI Ronggolawe Tuban University, tracer studies are still using google forms which aim to collect alumni data. It is still not effective and has many shortcomings in order to solve the problem, a UI/UX e-tracer study design was made using the double diamond method. The double diamond method is used by researchers to conduct usability evaluation tests on old tracer studies using the System Usability Scale (SUS) and the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ). The SUS results obtained from Google's old tracer study form are 49 (grade F) while the E-Tracer Study results are 82.6 (grade B) and the results from the UEQ show an attractiveness scale from 0.41 to 2.04, pepisicuity scale 0.21 to 2.28, efficiency scale 0.23 to 2.18, dependability scale 0.51 to 1.80, stimulation scale 0.54 to 2.13, and novelty scale -0.09 to 1.88. This proves that UI/UX design in E-Tracer Study resulted in an increase in usability","PeriodicalId":13567,"journal":{"name":"Infotek : Jurnal Informatika dan Teknologi","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infotek : Jurnal Informatika dan Teknologi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29408/jit.v6i1.7397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Currently, at PGRI Ronggolawe Tuban University, tracer studies are still using google forms which aim to collect alumni data. It is still not effective and has many shortcomings in order to solve the problem, a UI/UX e-tracer study design was made using the double diamond method. The double diamond method is used by researchers to conduct usability evaluation tests on old tracer studies using the System Usability Scale (SUS) and the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ). The SUS results obtained from Google's old tracer study form are 49 (grade F) while the E-Tracer Study results are 82.6 (grade B) and the results from the UEQ show an attractiveness scale from 0.41 to 2.04, pepisicuity scale 0.21 to 2.28, efficiency scale 0.23 to 2.18, dependability scale 0.51 to 1.80, stimulation scale 0.54 to 2.13, and novelty scale -0.09 to 1.88. This proves that UI/UX design in E-Tracer Study resulted in an increase in usability
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
设计UI/UX电子追踪研究UNIROW使用Doubel Diamond方法
目前,在PGRI Ronggolawe Tuban大学,示踪研究仍在使用谷歌表格,旨在收集校友数据。为了解决这一问题,采用双菱形法进行了UI/UX电子示踪剂的研究设计。双菱形法是研究人员利用系统可用性量表(System usability Scale, SUS)和用户体验问卷(User Experience Questionnaire, UEQ)对旧示踪剂研究进行可用性评估测试的方法。Google旧示踪剂研究表格的SUS结果为49 (F级),e -示踪剂研究结果为82.6 (B级),UEQ结果显示吸引力量表为0.41 - 2.04,消化度量表为0.21 - 2.28,效率量表为0.23 - 2.18,可靠性量表为0.51 - 1.80,刺激量表为0.54 - 2.13,新颖性量表为-0.09 - 1.88。这证明了在E-Tracer Study中的UI/UX设计导致了可用性的增加
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Penerapan Sistem Informasi Geografis Dalam Pemetaan Toko Oleh - Oleh Khas Lombok Penerapan Model Decision Tree Menggunakan Python Untuk Prediksi Faktor Dominan Penyebab Penyakit Stroke Penerapan Metode Waterfall dalam Pengembangan Aplikasi Schedule Maintenance Alat Produksi Perancangan Sistem Informasi Absensi Menggunakan Metode QR Code Berbasis Android Aplikasi IT Support Work Orders Berbasis Web Dalam Rangka Menuju Sidoarjo Smart City
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1