Successful Reservoir Fluid Characterization and Testing While Overcoming the Challenges of Falling Oil Price and a Pandemic: A First for an Integrated Brown Field Alliance Project in Sarawak, Malaysia

Muhamad Aizat B Kamaruddin, Muhammad Haniff Suhaimi, Firdaus Azwardy B. Salleh, N. Hardikar, N. Nathesan, Hilarion Millan, Fadzilazri Shapiei, Manh Hung Nguyen, Ivan Y. Nugraha Putra, Jos Pragt, Olufemi A. Adegbola, Adnan Ibrahim Khan
{"title":"Successful Reservoir Fluid Characterization and Testing While Overcoming the Challenges of Falling Oil Price and a Pandemic: A First for an Integrated Brown Field Alliance Project in Sarawak, Malaysia","authors":"Muhamad Aizat B Kamaruddin, Muhammad Haniff Suhaimi, Firdaus Azwardy B. Salleh, N. Hardikar, N. Nathesan, Hilarion Millan, Fadzilazri Shapiei, Manh Hung Nguyen, Ivan Y. Nugraha Putra, Jos Pragt, Olufemi A. Adegbola, Adnan Ibrahim Khan","doi":"10.2118/205778-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A brown field, offshore Sarawak, Malaysia, with multiple sub-layered laminated sands of varied pressure regimes and mobility ranges, was challenged by depletion, low mobility and uncertainty in the current fluid types and contacts. Optimal dynamic fluid characterization and testing techniques comprising both Wireline and Logging While Drilling (LWD) were applied in nine development wells to acquire reliable formation pressure data and collect representative fluid samples including fluid scanning. Some of the latest technologies were deployed during the dual crises of falling oil price and the Covid-19 pandemic.\n The S-profile wells were drilled using oil-base mud (OBM) with an average deviation of 60 degrees. Formation Pressure While Drilling (FPWD), Fluid Sampling While Drilling (FSWD) and wireline formation testing, and sampling were all utilized allowing appropriate assessment of zones of interest. Various probe types such as Conventional Circular, Reinforced Circular, Elongated, Extra-Elongated and Extended Range Focused were used successfully, ensuring that the right technology was deployed for the right job. Formation pressure and fluid samples were secured in a timely manner to minimize reservoir damage and optimize rig time without jeopardizing the data quality. As a classified crisis due to the pandemic, rather than delaying the operations, a Remote Operations Monitoring and Control Center was set-up in town to aid the limited crew at rig site.\n A high success rate was achieved in acquiring the latest formation pressure regimes, fluid gradients, scanning and sampling, allowing the best completion strategy to be implemented. With the selection of the appropriate probe type at individual sands, 336 pressure tests were conducted, 44 fluid gradients were established, 27 fluid identification (fluid-id / scanning) pump-outs were performed, and 20 representative formation fluid samples (oil, gas, water) were collected. Amongst the Layer-III, Layer-II and Layer-I sands, Layer-I was tight, with mobility < 1.0 mD/cP. Wireline focused probe sampling provided clean oil samples with 1.4 to-3.7 wt. % OBM filtrate contamination. The water samples collected from Layer-II during FSWD proved to be formation water and not injection water. The wells were thus completed as oil producers. Reliable fluid typing and PVT quality sampling at discrete depths saved rig time and eliminated the requirement of additional runs or services including Drill Stem Testing (DST).\n This case study has many firsts. It is the first time where latest fluid characterization and testing technologies in both Wireline and LWD were deployed for an alliance project in Malaysia and that too during dual crises of falling oil price and the pandemic aftermath. Overcoming various challenges including limited rig site manpower, there was no delay in completing the highly deviated wells with tight formations in a single drilling campaign and provided rig time savings.\n For the purpose of this case study, two wells have been discussed. First well used the wireline focused sampling technology and the second used the FSWD technology.","PeriodicalId":10970,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Tue, October 12, 2021","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Tue, October 12, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/205778-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A brown field, offshore Sarawak, Malaysia, with multiple sub-layered laminated sands of varied pressure regimes and mobility ranges, was challenged by depletion, low mobility and uncertainty in the current fluid types and contacts. Optimal dynamic fluid characterization and testing techniques comprising both Wireline and Logging While Drilling (LWD) were applied in nine development wells to acquire reliable formation pressure data and collect representative fluid samples including fluid scanning. Some of the latest technologies were deployed during the dual crises of falling oil price and the Covid-19 pandemic. The S-profile wells were drilled using oil-base mud (OBM) with an average deviation of 60 degrees. Formation Pressure While Drilling (FPWD), Fluid Sampling While Drilling (FSWD) and wireline formation testing, and sampling were all utilized allowing appropriate assessment of zones of interest. Various probe types such as Conventional Circular, Reinforced Circular, Elongated, Extra-Elongated and Extended Range Focused were used successfully, ensuring that the right technology was deployed for the right job. Formation pressure and fluid samples were secured in a timely manner to minimize reservoir damage and optimize rig time without jeopardizing the data quality. As a classified crisis due to the pandemic, rather than delaying the operations, a Remote Operations Monitoring and Control Center was set-up in town to aid the limited crew at rig site. A high success rate was achieved in acquiring the latest formation pressure regimes, fluid gradients, scanning and sampling, allowing the best completion strategy to be implemented. With the selection of the appropriate probe type at individual sands, 336 pressure tests were conducted, 44 fluid gradients were established, 27 fluid identification (fluid-id / scanning) pump-outs were performed, and 20 representative formation fluid samples (oil, gas, water) were collected. Amongst the Layer-III, Layer-II and Layer-I sands, Layer-I was tight, with mobility < 1.0 mD/cP. Wireline focused probe sampling provided clean oil samples with 1.4 to-3.7 wt. % OBM filtrate contamination. The water samples collected from Layer-II during FSWD proved to be formation water and not injection water. The wells were thus completed as oil producers. Reliable fluid typing and PVT quality sampling at discrete depths saved rig time and eliminated the requirement of additional runs or services including Drill Stem Testing (DST). This case study has many firsts. It is the first time where latest fluid characterization and testing technologies in both Wireline and LWD were deployed for an alliance project in Malaysia and that too during dual crises of falling oil price and the pandemic aftermath. Overcoming various challenges including limited rig site manpower, there was no delay in completing the highly deviated wells with tight formations in a single drilling campaign and provided rig time savings. For the purpose of this case study, two wells have been discussed. First well used the wireline focused sampling technology and the second used the FSWD technology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成功的油藏流体表征和测试,同时克服了油价下跌和流行病的挑战:首次在马来西亚沙捞越的综合布朗油田联盟项目中实现
马来西亚Sarawak海上有一个棕色油田,该油田有多个亚层状层状砂,具有不同的压力和流动性范围,面临枯竭、低流动性和当前流体类型和接触的不确定性的挑战。在9口开发井中,采用了电缆和随钻测井(LWD)等最优动态流体表征和测试技术,获得了可靠的地层压力数据,并收集了包括流体扫描在内的代表性流体样本。一些最新技术是在油价下跌和新冠肺炎大流行的双重危机期间部署的。s型井采用油基泥浆(OBM)钻井,井斜平均为60度。随钻地层压力(FPWD)、随钻流体取样(FSWD)、电缆地层测试和取样都得到了利用,从而对感兴趣的区域进行了适当的评估。成功使用了各种类型的探头,如常规圆形、增强圆形、加长、超加长和加长范围聚焦,确保了正确的技术应用于正确的作业。在不影响数据质量的前提下,及时获取地层压力和流体样品,最大限度地减少对油藏的损害,优化钻井时间。由于大流行,这是一个机密危机,而不是延迟操作,在镇上建立了一个远程操作监控中心,以帮助钻井现场有限的工作人员。在获取最新地层压力状态、流体梯度、扫描和采样方面取得了很高的成功率,从而实现了最佳完井策略。通过对各个砂层选择合适的探针类型,进行了336次压力测试,建立了44个流体梯度,进行了27次流体识别(流-液/扫描)泵出,并收集了20个具有代表性的地层流体样品(油、气、水)。在iii层、ii层和i层砂岩中,i层致密,流动性< 1.0 mD/cP;电缆聚焦探头取样提供了含有1.4 -3.7 wt. % OBM滤液污染的清洁油样。在FSWD期间从ii层收集的水样证明是地层水而不是注入水。这些井就这样完成了生产。可靠的流体类型和离散深度的PVT质量采样节省了钻机时间,并且无需额外的运行或服务,包括钻柱测试(DST)。这个案例研究有很多“第一”。这是在马来西亚的一个联盟项目中首次使用最新的电缆和随钻测井流体表征和测试技术,也是在油价下跌和疫情影响的双重危机期间。克服了各种挑战,包括有限的钻机现场人力,在一次钻井作业中没有延迟完成大斜度致密地层井,节省了钻机时间。为了本案例研究的目的,我们讨论了两口井。第一口井采用了电缆聚焦取样技术,第二口井采用了FSWD技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Successful Application of Managed Pressure Drilling and Cementing in Naturally Fractured Carbonates Environment of Prohorovskoe Exploration Well The Use of Induction Heating in Assessing the Technical Condition and Operating Intervals in Producing Wells A 3-Step Reaction Model For Numerical Simulation of In-Situ Combustion An Example of Building a Petrophysical Model of Unconsolidated Gas-Saturated Laminated Sediments Using Advanced Wireline and Logging While Drilling Services New method for Handling of Infrastructural Constraints for Integrated Modeling in Steady Case
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1