Prediction of elevation points using three different heuristic regression techniques

Vahdettin Demir, Ramazan Doğu
{"title":"Prediction of elevation points using three different heuristic regression techniques","authors":"Vahdettin Demir, Ramazan Doğu","doi":"10.31127/tuje.1257847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study is to estimate the elevation points used in the creation of the digital elevation model, which is the most important data of the projects and required in the engineering project, using horizontal and vertical location informations and three different heuristic regression techniques. As the study area, an area with mid-level elevations, located in the Marmara region, and covering a part of the intersection of Edirne, Kırklareli and Tekirdağ provinces was chosen. In the study, the estimations were investigated for three different sized areas, and these areas are square areas with the dimensions of 1x1 km, 10x10 km and 100x100 km, respectively. A total of 3500 elevation points were used in the study, and this number is constant in all areas, and 60% of these points were used in the testing phase and 40% in the training phase. The models used in the study are M5 model tree (M5-tree), multivariate adaptive regression curves (MARS) and Least Square Support Vector Regression (LSSVR). The results of the models were evaluated according to three different comparison criteria. These, coefficient of determination (R2), Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) were used. When the modeling results are examined; M5-Tree regression method gave the best results (1), LSSVR method was better than MARS methods (2), The most successful input data was found in datasets using X and Y coordinates information, and the worst results were found in datasets using X coordinates (3). As the study area increased, the model performance did not improve (4). The least error was obtained in the modeling of 1x1 km area, and the highest R² was obtained from the modeling of 10x10 km area (5). It was concluded that the M5-tree method is a very successful method in height modeling.","PeriodicalId":23377,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Engineering and Environmental Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Engineering and Environmental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.1257847","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study is to estimate the elevation points used in the creation of the digital elevation model, which is the most important data of the projects and required in the engineering project, using horizontal and vertical location informations and three different heuristic regression techniques. As the study area, an area with mid-level elevations, located in the Marmara region, and covering a part of the intersection of Edirne, Kırklareli and Tekirdağ provinces was chosen. In the study, the estimations were investigated for three different sized areas, and these areas are square areas with the dimensions of 1x1 km, 10x10 km and 100x100 km, respectively. A total of 3500 elevation points were used in the study, and this number is constant in all areas, and 60% of these points were used in the testing phase and 40% in the training phase. The models used in the study are M5 model tree (M5-tree), multivariate adaptive regression curves (MARS) and Least Square Support Vector Regression (LSSVR). The results of the models were evaluated according to three different comparison criteria. These, coefficient of determination (R2), Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) were used. When the modeling results are examined; M5-Tree regression method gave the best results (1), LSSVR method was better than MARS methods (2), The most successful input data was found in datasets using X and Y coordinates information, and the worst results were found in datasets using X coordinates (3). As the study area increased, the model performance did not improve (4). The least error was obtained in the modeling of 1x1 km area, and the highest R² was obtained from the modeling of 10x10 km area (5). It was concluded that the M5-tree method is a very successful method in height modeling.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用三种不同的启发式回归技术预测高程点
本研究的目的是利用水平和垂直位置信息以及三种不同的启发式回归技术,估计用于创建数字高程模型的高程点,这是项目中最重要的数据,也是工程项目所需的数据。作为研究区域,选择了位于马尔马拉地区的一个中等海拔区域,覆盖了Edirne, Kırklareli和tekirdalu省交界处的一部分。在研究中,研究了三个不同大小的区域,这些区域分别为1x1 km, 10x10 km和100x100 km的方形区域。研究中总共使用了3500个高程点,这个数字在所有区域都是恒定的,其中60%的高程点用于测试阶段,40%用于训练阶段。研究中使用的模型有M5模型树(M5-tree)、多变量自适应回归曲线(MARS)和最小二乘支持向量回归(LSSVR)。根据三种不同的比较标准对模型的结果进行评价。这些,决定系数(R2),平均绝对误差(MAE)和均方根误差(RMSE)。当对建模结果进行检验时;M5-Tree回归方法的结果最好(1),LSSVR方法优于MARS方法(2),X和Y坐标信息的数据集输入数据最成功,X坐标信息的数据集结果最差(3)。随着研究面积的增加,模型性能没有提高(4)。在1x1 km区域建模时误差最小。在10x10 km区域的模拟中,R²最高(5)。结果表明,M5-tree方法是一种非常成功的高度模拟方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Solution‐Based Fabrication of Copper Oxide Thin Film Influence of Transition Metal (Cobalt) Doping on Structural, Morphological, Electrical, and Optical Properties Optimal Power Flow Analysis with Circulatory System-Based Optimization Algorithm Counterface Soil Type and Loading Condition Effects on Granular/Cohesive Soil – Geofoam Interface Shear Behavior Comparison of CNN-Based Methods for Yoga Pose Classification Prediction of elevation points using three different heuristic regression techniques
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1