Adversarial Web Search

IF 8.3 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval Pub Date : 2011-01-09 DOI:10.1561/1500000021
C. Castillo, Brian D. Davison
{"title":"Adversarial Web Search","authors":"C. Castillo, Brian D. Davison","doi":"10.1561/1500000021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Web search engines have become indispensable tools for finding content. As the popularity of the Web has increased, the efforts to exploit the Web for commercial, social, or political advantage have grown, making it harder for search engines to discriminate between truthful signals of content quality and deceptive attempts to game search engines' rankings. This problem is further complicated by the open nature of the Web, which allows anyone to write and publish anything, and by the fact that search engines must analyze ever-growing numbers of Web pages. Moreover, increasing expectations of users, who over time rely on Web search for information needs related to more aspects of their lives, further deepen the need for search engines to develop effective counter-measures against deception. \n \nIn this monograph, we consider the effects of the adversarial relationship between search systems and those who wish to manipulate them, a field known as \"Adversarial Information Retrieval\". We show that search engine spammers create false content and misleading links to lure unsuspecting visitors to pages filled with advertisements or malware. We also examine work over the past decade or so that aims to discover such spamming activities to get spam pages removed or their effect on the quality of the results reduced. \n \nResearch in Adversarial Information Retrieval has been evolving over time, and currently continues both in traditional areas (e.g., link spam) and newer areas, such as click fraud and spam in social media, demonstrating that this conflict is far from over.","PeriodicalId":48829,"journal":{"name":"Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval","volume":"1 1","pages":"377-486"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"116","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1561/1500000021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 116

Abstract

Web search engines have become indispensable tools for finding content. As the popularity of the Web has increased, the efforts to exploit the Web for commercial, social, or political advantage have grown, making it harder for search engines to discriminate between truthful signals of content quality and deceptive attempts to game search engines' rankings. This problem is further complicated by the open nature of the Web, which allows anyone to write and publish anything, and by the fact that search engines must analyze ever-growing numbers of Web pages. Moreover, increasing expectations of users, who over time rely on Web search for information needs related to more aspects of their lives, further deepen the need for search engines to develop effective counter-measures against deception. In this monograph, we consider the effects of the adversarial relationship between search systems and those who wish to manipulate them, a field known as "Adversarial Information Retrieval". We show that search engine spammers create false content and misleading links to lure unsuspecting visitors to pages filled with advertisements or malware. We also examine work over the past decade or so that aims to discover such spamming activities to get spam pages removed or their effect on the quality of the results reduced. Research in Adversarial Information Retrieval has been evolving over time, and currently continues both in traditional areas (e.g., link spam) and newer areas, such as click fraud and spam in social media, demonstrating that this conflict is far from over.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对抗性网络搜索
网络搜索引擎已经成为寻找内容不可或缺的工具。随着网络越来越受欢迎,利用网络获取商业、社会或政治利益的努力也越来越多,这使得搜索引擎很难区分内容质量的真实信号和欺骗搜索引擎排名的企图。由于Web的开放性(任何人都可以编写和发布任何内容)以及搜索引擎必须分析不断增长的Web页面数量,这个问题变得更加复杂。此外,随着时间的推移,用户越来越依赖网络搜索来获取与他们生活的更多方面相关的信息需求,用户的期望越来越高,这进一步加深了对搜索引擎开发有效的反欺骗措施的需求。在这本专著中,我们考虑了搜索系统和那些希望操纵它们的人之间的对抗性关系的影响,这是一个被称为“对抗性信息检索”的领域。我们表明,搜索引擎垃圾邮件发送者创建虚假内容和误导性链接,以引诱毫无防备的访问者进入充满广告或恶意软件的页面。我们还检查了过去十年左右的工作,旨在发现此类垃圾邮件活动,以删除垃圾邮件页面或降低其对结果质量的影响。对抗性信息检索的研究一直在不断发展,目前在传统领域(如链接垃圾邮件)和新领域(如社交媒体中的点击欺诈和垃圾邮件)都在继续,这表明这种冲突远未结束。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval
Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
39.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
期刊介绍: The surge in research across all domains in the past decade has resulted in a plethora of new publications, causing an exponential growth in published research. Navigating through this extensive literature and staying current has become a time-consuming challenge. While electronic publishing provides instant access to more articles than ever, discerning the essential ones for a comprehensive understanding of any topic remains an issue. To tackle this, Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval - FnTIR - addresses the problem by publishing high-quality survey and tutorial monographs in the field. Each issue of Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval - FnT IR features a 50-100 page monograph authored by research leaders, covering tutorial subjects, research retrospectives, and survey papers that provide state-of-the-art reviews within the scope of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Multi-hop Question Answering User Simulation for Evaluating Information Access Systems Conversational Information Seeking Perspectives of Neurodiverse Participants in Interactive Information Retrieval Efficient and Effective Tree-based and Neural Learning to Rank
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1