Examining cognitive sex differences in elite math intensive education: Preliminary evidence from a gender inequitable country

IF 3.4 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Trends in Neuroscience and Education Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.tine.2022.100172
Varsha Singh , Sonika Thakral , Kunal Singh , Rahul Garg
{"title":"Examining cognitive sex differences in elite math intensive education: Preliminary evidence from a gender inequitable country","authors":"Varsha Singh ,&nbsp;Sonika Thakral ,&nbsp;Kunal Singh ,&nbsp;Rahul Garg","doi":"10.1016/j.tine.2022.100172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>It is unclear how cognitive control accounts for academic performance in math-intensive higher education and how it links to male over-representation in math-intensive education in gender-inequitable countries.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To examine the link between cognitive control and math-intensive education with a focus on male overrepresentation by using cognitive performance (task and construct level) to account for academic grades, and examining sex-specificity in cognitive performance (task and construct level), and using sex-differences in cognitive performance to account for academic grades.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>Four hierarchical regressions were used (two using task scores and two summed scores) with predictors entered in 3 blocks (working memory, flexibility, inhibition) to explain academic performance (bootstrapped sampling at 2000 samples; </span><em>N</em><span> = 39; males =69%). Task-level analysis (Corsi span &amp; mental rotation) and construct-level analysis indicate working memory as a significant predictor of grades, model-fit improved for all-male sample. Results of analysis of variance using the performance of 183 students on four cognitive tasks (</span><em>N</em> = 183; males = 81%) showed high scores of working memory task and decision-making task among male participants; female scores were higher in a task assessing planning/cognitive flexibility and in the inhibition task. Differences in the two hierarchical regressions indicated that planning/cognitive flexibility accounts for the academic performance of the male-female mixed sample; however, working memory, most importantly decision-making related to risk and uncertainty, accounts for the academic performance of the all-male sample.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Similar to developing countries, working memory and decision making might contribute to academic performance, potentially explaining male over-representation in math-intensive higher education. Academic grades might disproportionately rely on working memory and risky decision-making; equal emphasis and inclusive development of all components of cognitive control via academic curriculum and assessment might improve diversity in math-intensive higher education.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46228,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211949322000011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background

It is unclear how cognitive control accounts for academic performance in math-intensive higher education and how it links to male over-representation in math-intensive education in gender-inequitable countries.

Purpose

To examine the link between cognitive control and math-intensive education with a focus on male overrepresentation by using cognitive performance (task and construct level) to account for academic grades, and examining sex-specificity in cognitive performance (task and construct level), and using sex-differences in cognitive performance to account for academic grades.

Results

Four hierarchical regressions were used (two using task scores and two summed scores) with predictors entered in 3 blocks (working memory, flexibility, inhibition) to explain academic performance (bootstrapped sampling at 2000 samples; N = 39; males =69%). Task-level analysis (Corsi span & mental rotation) and construct-level analysis indicate working memory as a significant predictor of grades, model-fit improved for all-male sample. Results of analysis of variance using the performance of 183 students on four cognitive tasks (N = 183; males = 81%) showed high scores of working memory task and decision-making task among male participants; female scores were higher in a task assessing planning/cognitive flexibility and in the inhibition task. Differences in the two hierarchical regressions indicated that planning/cognitive flexibility accounts for the academic performance of the male-female mixed sample; however, working memory, most importantly decision-making related to risk and uncertainty, accounts for the academic performance of the all-male sample.

Conclusion

Similar to developing countries, working memory and decision making might contribute to academic performance, potentially explaining male over-representation in math-intensive higher education. Academic grades might disproportionately rely on working memory and risky decision-making; equal emphasis and inclusive development of all components of cognitive control via academic curriculum and assessment might improve diversity in math-intensive higher education.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
检验精英数学强化教育中的认知性别差异:来自性别不平等国家的初步证据
目前尚不清楚认知控制如何影响数学密集型高等教育的学习成绩,以及在性别不平等的国家,认知控制如何与数学密集型教育中男性比例过高联系起来。目的研究认知控制与数学强化教育之间的联系,重点关注男性比例过高,方法是使用认知表现(任务和结构水平)来解释学业成绩,并检查认知表现(任务和结构水平)的性别特异性,以及使用认知表现的性别差异来解释学业成绩。结果采用4个层次回归(2个使用任务分数,2个使用总和分数),预测因子分为3个区块(工作记忆、灵活性、抑制)来解释学习成绩(自举抽样2000个样本;n = 39;男性= 69%)。任务级分析(Corsi span &心理旋转和结构水平分析表明,工作记忆是成绩的显著预测因子,模型拟合在所有男性样本中都有所改善。183名学生在四项认知任务上的表现的方差分析结果(N = 183;男性(81%)在工作记忆任务和决策任务中得分较高;女性在评估计划/认知灵活性的任务和抑制任务中的得分更高。两个层次回归的差异表明,计划/认知灵活性对男女混合样本的学习成绩有影响;然而,工作记忆,最重要的是与风险和不确定性相关的决策,解释了所有男性样本的学习成绩。结论:与发展中国家类似,工作记忆和决策能力可能对学习成绩有影响,这可能解释了在数学密集型高等教育中男性比例过高的原因。学习成绩可能不成比例地依赖于工作记忆和冒险决策;通过学术课程和评估平等地强调和包容性地发展认知控制的所有组成部分,可能会改善数学密集型高等教育的多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
22
审稿时长
65 days
期刊最新文献
Dimensional versus categorical approach: A comparative study of mathematical cognition Translating neuroscience research to practice through grassroots professional learning communities Combining cognitive and affective factors related to mathematical achievement in 4th graders: A psychological network analysis study Neurobiological stress markers in educational research: A systematic review of physiological insights in health science education Applying the science of learning to teacher professional development and back again: Lessons from 3 country contexts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1