Using framework analysis to understand multiple stakeholders' views of vocational rehabilitation following acquired brain injury.

IF 1.7 4区 工程技术 Q3 INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION Review of Scientific Instruments Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2022-11-23 DOI:10.1017/BrImp.2022.27
Venerina Johnston, Charlotte Brakenridge, Donna Valiant, Charmaine Leow Kai Ling, Nicole Andrews, Elise M Gane, Ben Turner, Melissa Kendall, Ray Quinn
{"title":"Using framework analysis to understand multiple stakeholders' views of vocational rehabilitation following acquired brain injury.","authors":"Venerina Johnston, Charlotte Brakenridge, Donna Valiant, Charmaine Leow Kai Ling, Nicole Andrews, Elise M Gane, Ben Turner, Melissa Kendall, Ray Quinn","doi":"10.1017/BrImp.2022.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore how vocational rehabilitation (VR) is currently delivered for individuals with acquired brain injury (ABI) across multiple stakeholder groups and identify areas for improvement in service delivery using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven focus groups were conducted with rehabilitation clinicians; outreach providers, insurers/regulators, VR providers and disability employment service providers (<i>n</i> = 44) experienced in VR of individuals with ABI. All groups were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data analysis was guided by the CFIR constructs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All stakeholder groups believed they offered quality VR interventions given available resources and legislation, but many clients fell through the 'cracks'. Themes that were identified included: a) number and complexity of systems supporting VR; b) fractured communication across systems, c) lack of knowledge by both stakeholders and clients in navigating systems, d) lack of expertise in supporting the vocational needs of clients with ABI and e) perceived limited awareness of ABI by employers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Stakeholders and clients need support to navigate Australia's complex VR pathways. Limited specialist ABI clinicians, VR providers and disability employment services were identified as barriers for effective VR. Domains of the CFIR were appropriate for organising and understanding how VR is delivered.</p>","PeriodicalId":21111,"journal":{"name":"Review of Scientific Instruments","volume":"71 1","pages":"347-370"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Scientific Instruments","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/BrImp.2022.27","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To explore how vocational rehabilitation (VR) is currently delivered for individuals with acquired brain injury (ABI) across multiple stakeholder groups and identify areas for improvement in service delivery using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).

Methods: Seven focus groups were conducted with rehabilitation clinicians; outreach providers, insurers/regulators, VR providers and disability employment service providers (n = 44) experienced in VR of individuals with ABI. All groups were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data analysis was guided by the CFIR constructs.

Results: All stakeholder groups believed they offered quality VR interventions given available resources and legislation, but many clients fell through the 'cracks'. Themes that were identified included: a) number and complexity of systems supporting VR; b) fractured communication across systems, c) lack of knowledge by both stakeholders and clients in navigating systems, d) lack of expertise in supporting the vocational needs of clients with ABI and e) perceived limited awareness of ABI by employers.

Conclusion: Stakeholders and clients need support to navigate Australia's complex VR pathways. Limited specialist ABI clinicians, VR providers and disability employment services were identified as barriers for effective VR. Domains of the CFIR were appropriate for organising and understanding how VR is delivered.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用框架分析法了解多方利益相关者对后天脑损伤后职业康复的看法。
目的:探讨多个利益相关群体目前如何为后天性脑损伤(ABI)患者提供职业康复(VR)服务,并利用实施研究综合框架(CFIR)确定服务提供的改进领域:方法:与康复临床医生、外展服务提供者、保险商/监管机构、自愿康复服务提供者和残疾就业服务提供者(n = 44)开展了七次焦点小组讨论,他们在为后天性脑损伤(ABI)患者提供自愿康复服务方面经验丰富。所有小组均进行了录音和逐字记录。数据分析以 CFIR 结构为指导:所有利益相关群体都认为,鉴于现有的资源和法律,他们提供了高质量的自愿回归干预,但许多客户却 "漏网 "了。确定的主题包括:a) 支持职业康复的系统的数量和复杂性;b) 各系统间的沟通不畅;c) 利益相关者和客户缺乏驾驭系统的知识;d) 缺乏支持有 ABI 的客户的职业需求的专业知识;e) 雇主对 ABI 的认识有限:结论:利益相关者和客户需要得到支持,以了解澳大利亚复杂的职业康复途径。有限的专业 ABI 临床医生、VR 提供者和残疾人就业服务被认为是有效 VR 的障碍。CFIR的各个领域适合于组织和了解如何提供自愿回归。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Review of Scientific Instruments
Review of Scientific Instruments 工程技术-物理:应用
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
758
审稿时长
2.6 months
期刊介绍: Review of Scientific Instruments, is committed to the publication of advances in scientific instruments, apparatuses, and techniques. RSI seeks to meet the needs of engineers and scientists in physics, chemistry, and the life sciences.
期刊最新文献
The design and analysis of high-precision x-ray mirror benders for Kirkpatrick-Baez mirror system in Hefei advanced light facility. Study on dead zone light recovery of silicon photomultipliers (SiPM) based on focon/tapered fiber arrays. In situ study on the thermoelectric properties of monolayer MoS2 film. Development of an ultraprecise glue-free bimorph deformable mirror with a length of 460 mm. Design and operation of APEX-LD: A compact levitated dipole for a positron-electron experiment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1