Implikasi Hukum Pengujian Peraturan Daerah Pasca Amandemen Undang-Undang Dasar 1945

King Faisal Sulaiman
{"title":"Implikasi Hukum Pengujian Peraturan Daerah Pasca Amandemen Undang-Undang Dasar 1945","authors":"King Faisal Sulaiman","doi":"10.30649/ph.v19i1.160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to explain in detail why the dualism of local regulations testing after the amendment of the 1945 Constitution Research is also directed to provide a testing system solutions in the future regulation. Legal discourses are still academic debate is when the right of judicial review by the Supreme Court Regulation hostage by Law No. 23 of 2014 on Regional Government. Supremacy of the constitution as part of the main characteristics of the legal state impressed distorted due to the duality of the regulation testing including how the implications of the Constitutional Court Number 137 PUU-XIII / 2015 Jo Court Number 56 / PUU-XIV / 2016 on June 14, 2017 last. Position regulation as executive versus legislative product as much a part of this study in order to find the ideal solution testing legislation in the future.The research method used was a normative legal research (legal research) which is based on the study of literature or secondary data divided form the primary legal materials, secondary law material and tertiary legal materials. Models used approach is the approach of law (statute aproach) and conceptual approach (conceptual aproach). A number of secondary data collected will be analyzed by descriptive qualitative where the process used deductive thinking. To get accuracy of understanding (subtilitas itellegendi) and accuracy translating (subtilitas explicandi) to solve the problem formulation.","PeriodicalId":31466,"journal":{"name":"Perspektif Hukum Journal","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspektif Hukum Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30649/ph.v19i1.160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to explain in detail why the dualism of local regulations testing after the amendment of the 1945 Constitution Research is also directed to provide a testing system solutions in the future regulation. Legal discourses are still academic debate is when the right of judicial review by the Supreme Court Regulation hostage by Law No. 23 of 2014 on Regional Government. Supremacy of the constitution as part of the main characteristics of the legal state impressed distorted due to the duality of the regulation testing including how the implications of the Constitutional Court Number 137 PUU-XIII / 2015 Jo Court Number 56 / PUU-XIV / 2016 on June 14, 2017 last. Position regulation as executive versus legislative product as much a part of this study in order to find the ideal solution testing legislation in the future.The research method used was a normative legal research (legal research) which is based on the study of literature or secondary data divided form the primary legal materials, secondary law material and tertiary legal materials. Models used approach is the approach of law (statute aproach) and conceptual approach (conceptual aproach). A number of secondary data collected will be analyzed by descriptive qualitative where the process used deductive thinking. To get accuracy of understanding (subtilitas itellegendi) and accuracy translating (subtilitas explicandi) to solve the problem formulation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1945年宪法修正案后地方测试法的影响
本研究旨在详细解释为何1945年宪法修订后地方法规检验的二元论研究,也旨在为未来的法规检验制度提供解决方案。法律话语学界仍在争论的是,当司法审查权被最高法院规制为2014年第23号《地方政府法》的人质时。宪法至上作为法律国家的主要特征之一,由于对法规的两重性的扭曲而印象深刻,包括宪法法院第137号PUU-XIII / 2015 Jo法院第56号/ PUU-XIV / 2016 2017年6月14日最后的含义。将法规定位为执行产品与立法产品是本研究的一部分,以便在未来找到测试立法的理想解决方案。所使用的研究方法是一种规范的法律研究(legal research),它以文献或二手资料的研究为基础,分为一级法律资料、二级法律资料和三级法律资料。采用的模型方法有法律方法(成文法方法)和概念方法(概念方法)。收集到的一些次要数据将通过描述性定性分析其中使用演绎思维的过程。以理解的准确性(subtilitas itellegendi)和翻译的准确性(subtilitas explicandi)来解决问题的表述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
Restatement Kelalaian Dalam Malpraktik Medis Ekonomi Biru sebagai Upaya Pembangunan Berkelanjutan dan Pemenuhan Hak Asasi Manusia Tinjauan Hukum Pembangunan Berkelanjutan Proyek IKN dalam Mempertahankan Keseimbangan Ekosistem Lingkungan Pelanggaran Indikasi Geografis ditinjau dari Aspek Perlindungan Konsumen Kewenangan Pemerintah Daerah untuk Melindungi Bidan yang Melaksanakan Program Keluarga Berencana
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1