{"title":"Why Negotiated Rulemaking Is Still Vital: An Interview with Susan Podziba","authors":"Russ Bleemer","doi":"10.1002/alt.21965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Negotiated rulemaking, at its heart, is an alternative dispute resolution process, often dependent upon mediation techniques to gain input from stakeholders who will be subject to regulatory processes. The goal is to produce an oversight process that interested parties can live with and that serves whatever the public purposes are in issuing the rules.</p>","PeriodicalId":100074,"journal":{"name":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","volume":"40 9","pages":"137-148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alt.21965","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Negotiated rulemaking, at its heart, is an alternative dispute resolution process, often dependent upon mediation techniques to gain input from stakeholders who will be subject to regulatory processes. The goal is to produce an oversight process that interested parties can live with and that serves whatever the public purposes are in issuing the rules.