Alternatives presents a special feature comparison of the current employment arbitration rules from four major dispute resolution providers. When using the rules, best practice is to check the latest versions for the exact current wording in the comparison categories, available at the organizations' websites listed at the top of the chart.
Last month, the author examined U.S. judicial interpretations of primary and secondary jurisdiction considerations under the New York Convention and its U.S. enabling statute, the Federal Arbitration Act's Chapter 2, with respect to awards issued in international arbitrations. In this month's conclusion, the focus is on the effects of the laws on jurisdiction and venue over actions and proceedings falling under the Convention. See “The New York Convention: How Courts Interpret Jurisdiction on Awards—A U.S. Perspective,” 42 Alternatives 9 (January 2024) (available at https://bit.ly/3RXb3tO).
So long as society is founded on injustice, the function of the laws will be to defend injustice. And the more unjust they are the more respectable they will seem.
In Part 1 of 2, London Alternatives columnist Adam Samuel looks at typical family fights that affect family businesses—power imbalances, bad family lawyering, and all manner of bequeathment disputes. Still to come: preventing and resolving the warfare over the family business proper—which is big business for neutrals, litigators, and courts world-wide.
There has been a significant body of U.S. federal case law where jurisdictional issues concerning the 1958 Convention on Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards have been litigated in the U.S. This article focuses on federal courts' interpretation on certain—not all—of those jurisdictional issues in connection with the Federal Arbitration Act—state law and state courts are out of the scope of this article.
A long-running battle over a decade-old arbitration award that, with interest, has soared to more than $11 billion against the Nigeria government appears to be nearing its end in dramatic style: The United Kingdom's High Court of Justice confirmed the reversal of the arbitration award.
On Page 167 inside, Alternatives presents a special full-issue feature comparison of the current rules from five major administrative bodies in the international arbitration field. When using the rules, best practice is to check the latest versions for the exact current wording in the comparison categories, available at the organizations' websites listed at the top of the chart.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：