A comparison of effects of enteral nutrition by endoscopic jejunal feeding tube placement versus total parenteral nutrition on patients with acute pancreatitis

Xuejun Li
{"title":"A comparison of effects of enteral nutrition by endoscopic jejunal feeding tube placement versus total parenteral nutrition on patients with acute pancreatitis","authors":"Xuejun Li","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-4756.2020.03.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo compare the effects of enteral nutrition (EN) by endoscopic jejunal feeding tube placement and total parenteral nutrition (TPN) on patients with acute pancreatitis. \n \n \nMethods \nA total of 60 patient with acute pancreatitis treated in Central Theater Air Force Hospital from March 2012 to December 2019 were enrolled, and they were divided into control group and observation group by random number table method, with 30 cases in each group. Control group received the TPN, while the observation group received the EN by endoscopic jejunal feeding tube placement. Then, the nutrition level, including serum albumin (ALB), prealbumin (PA), rehabilitation quality (ApacheⅡ), blood amylase level, C-reactive protein (CRP), clinical efficacy and complications were compared between the two groups. \n \n \nResults \nThe ALB and PA levels of the observation group were higher than those of the control group on 14 d after treatment (P<0.05). The Apache Ⅱ scores of the observation group were lower than those of the control group on 7 and 14 d after treatment (P<0.05). The blood amylase level and CRP in the observation group was lower than that in the control group on 14 d after treatment (P<0.05). The total clinical efficacy rate of the observation group was 86.67% (26/30), higher than the 63.33% (19/30) of the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of the complications in the observation group was 13.33% (4/30), lower than the 36.67% (11/30) in the control group (P<0.05). \n \n \nConclusions \nEN by endoscopic jejunal feeding tube placement can effectively ameliorate the nutritional level, improve quality of rehabilitation, reduce incidence of complications of patients with acute pancreatitis. \n \n \nKey words: \nJejunal feeding tube; Acute pancreatitis; Rehabilitation quality; Complications","PeriodicalId":9667,"journal":{"name":"Central Plains Medical Journal","volume":"21 1","pages":"82-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central Plains Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-4756.2020.03.022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To compare the effects of enteral nutrition (EN) by endoscopic jejunal feeding tube placement and total parenteral nutrition (TPN) on patients with acute pancreatitis. Methods A total of 60 patient with acute pancreatitis treated in Central Theater Air Force Hospital from March 2012 to December 2019 were enrolled, and they were divided into control group and observation group by random number table method, with 30 cases in each group. Control group received the TPN, while the observation group received the EN by endoscopic jejunal feeding tube placement. Then, the nutrition level, including serum albumin (ALB), prealbumin (PA), rehabilitation quality (ApacheⅡ), blood amylase level, C-reactive protein (CRP), clinical efficacy and complications were compared between the two groups. Results The ALB and PA levels of the observation group were higher than those of the control group on 14 d after treatment (P<0.05). The Apache Ⅱ scores of the observation group were lower than those of the control group on 7 and 14 d after treatment (P<0.05). The blood amylase level and CRP in the observation group was lower than that in the control group on 14 d after treatment (P<0.05). The total clinical efficacy rate of the observation group was 86.67% (26/30), higher than the 63.33% (19/30) of the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of the complications in the observation group was 13.33% (4/30), lower than the 36.67% (11/30) in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusions EN by endoscopic jejunal feeding tube placement can effectively ameliorate the nutritional level, improve quality of rehabilitation, reduce incidence of complications of patients with acute pancreatitis. Key words: Jejunal feeding tube; Acute pancreatitis; Rehabilitation quality; Complications
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内镜下空肠管置管与全肠外营养对急性胰腺炎患者肠内营养效果的比较
目的比较内镜下空肠置管肠内营养(EN)与全肠外营养(TPN)治疗急性胰腺炎的疗效。方法选取2012年3月至2019年12月空军中央战区医院收治的急性胰腺炎患者60例,采用随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组,每组30例。对照组采用TPN,观察组采用内镜下空肠置管方式给予EN。比较两组患者的营养水平,包括血清白蛋白(ALB)、前白蛋白(PA)、康复质量(ApacheⅡ)、血淀粉酶水平、c反应蛋白(CRP)、临床疗效及并发症。结果观察组患者治疗后14 d ALB、PA水平均高于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组患者治疗后7、14 d ApacheⅡ评分均低于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组患者治疗后14 d血淀粉酶、CRP水平均低于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组总临床有效率为86.67%(26/30),高于对照组的63.33%(19/30),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组并发症发生率为13.33%(4/30),低于对照组36.67% (11/30)(P<0.05)。结论EN经内镜下空肠置管可有效改善急性胰腺炎患者的营养水平,提高康复质量,减少并发症的发生。关键词:空肠饲管;急性胰腺炎;康复质量;并发症
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical analysis of 200 cases of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia Analgesic effects of ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane block on patients undergoing endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion Levels and significance of pepsinogen, gastrin 17 in serum in patients with chronic atrophic gastritis Application value of high-frequency ultrasound in the diagnosis of diabetic lower extremity vascular diseases Clinical effects of combination of edaravone, clopidogrel and butylphthalide injection on acute progressive cerebral infarction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1