Property Assertion Constraints for ontologies and knowledge graphs

IF 1.7 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Data Technologies and Applications Pub Date : 2022-08-13 DOI:10.1108/dta-05-2022-0209
H. Dibowski
{"title":"Property Assertion Constraints for ontologies and knowledge graphs","authors":"H. Dibowski","doi":"10.1108/dta-05-2022-0209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe curation of ontologies and knowledge graphs (KGs) is an essential task for industrial knowledge-based applications, as they rely on the contained knowledge to be correct and error-free. Often, a significant amount of a KG is curated by humans. Established validation methods, such as Shapes Constraint Language, Shape Expressions or Web Ontology Language, can detect wrong statements only after their materialization, which can be too late. Instead, an approach that avoids errors and adequately supports users is required.Design/methodology/approachFor solving that problem, Property Assertion Constraints (PACs) have been developed. PACs extend the range definition of a property with additional logic expressed with SPARQL. For the context of a given instance and property, a tailored PAC query is dynamically built and triggered on the KG. It can determine all values that will result in valid property value assertions.FindingsPACs can avoid the expansion of KGs with invalid property value assertions effectively, as their contained expertise narrows down the valid options a user can choose from. This simplifies the knowledge curation and, most notably, relieves users or machines from knowing and applying this expertise, but instead enables a computer to take care of it.Originality/valuePACs are fundamentally different from existing approaches. Instead of detecting erroneous materialized facts, they can determine all semantically correct assertions before materializing them. This avoids invalid property value assertions and provides users an informed, purposeful assistance. To the author's knowledge, PACs are the only such approach.","PeriodicalId":56156,"journal":{"name":"Data Technologies and Applications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Data Technologies and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/dta-05-2022-0209","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeThe curation of ontologies and knowledge graphs (KGs) is an essential task for industrial knowledge-based applications, as they rely on the contained knowledge to be correct and error-free. Often, a significant amount of a KG is curated by humans. Established validation methods, such as Shapes Constraint Language, Shape Expressions or Web Ontology Language, can detect wrong statements only after their materialization, which can be too late. Instead, an approach that avoids errors and adequately supports users is required.Design/methodology/approachFor solving that problem, Property Assertion Constraints (PACs) have been developed. PACs extend the range definition of a property with additional logic expressed with SPARQL. For the context of a given instance and property, a tailored PAC query is dynamically built and triggered on the KG. It can determine all values that will result in valid property value assertions.FindingsPACs can avoid the expansion of KGs with invalid property value assertions effectively, as their contained expertise narrows down the valid options a user can choose from. This simplifies the knowledge curation and, most notably, relieves users or machines from knowing and applying this expertise, but instead enables a computer to take care of it.Originality/valuePACs are fundamentally different from existing approaches. Instead of detecting erroneous materialized facts, they can determine all semantically correct assertions before materializing them. This avoids invalid property value assertions and provides users an informed, purposeful assistance. To the author's knowledge, PACs are the only such approach.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本体和知识图的属性断言约束
目的本体和知识图(KGs)的管理是工业知识应用的一项基本任务,因为它们依赖于所包含的知识是正确和无错误的。通常,KG的很大一部分是由人类管理的。现有的验证方法,如形状约束语言、形状表达式或Web本体语言,只能在错误语句物化之后才能检测到错误语句,这可能为时已晚。相反,需要一种避免错误并充分支持用户的方法。设计/方法论/方法为了解决这个问题,开发了属性断言约束(Property Assertion Constraints, pac)。pac通过使用SPARQL表达的附加逻辑扩展属性的范围定义。对于给定实例和属性的上下文,将在KG上动态构建并触发定制的PAC查询。它可以确定将导致有效属性值断言的所有值。查找spacs可以有效地避免扩展具有无效属性值断言的kg,因为它们包含的专业知识缩小了用户可以选择的有效选项。这简化了知识管理,最值得注意的是,使用户或机器不必了解和应用这些专业知识,而是使计算机能够照顾它。原创性/价值pac从根本上不同于现有的方法。与检测错误的物化事实不同,它们可以在物化断言之前确定所有语义正确的断言。这避免了无效的属性值断言,并为用户提供了明智的、有目的的帮助。据作者所知,政治行动委员会是唯一这样的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Data Technologies and Applications
Data Technologies and Applications Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Previously published as: Program Online from: 2018 Subject Area: Information & Knowledge Management, Library Studies
期刊最新文献
Understanding customer behavior by mapping complaints to personality based on social media textual data A systematic review of the use of FHIR to support clinical research, public health and medical education Novel framework for learning performance prediction using pattern identification and deep learning A comparative analysis of job satisfaction prediction models using machine learning: a mixed-method approach Assessing the alignment of corporate ESG disclosures with the UN sustainable development goals: a BERT-based text analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1