{"title":"Asian Scientists on the Move: Changing Science in a Changing Asia","authors":"Larry Au","doi":"10.1080/18752160.2022.2162365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The imaginary of an ascendant Asia as a scientific and technological powerhouse has loomed large in public and policy debates in the United States and Europe in recent years. Increasingly, universities and research institutes in Asia are seen as competitors and innovators that have the potential to disrupt established hierarchies in the global scientific field. In Anju Mary Paul’s Asian Scientists on the Move: Changing Science in a Changing Asia, we see the transnational social lives of the scientists behind these developments and come to understand the complex decisions that shape their scientific careers and migratory decisions. Paul shows the linkages between national systems and cultures of science and the global scientific field, and identifies the agency of individual actors in raising the national profiles of their “home” and “host” countries in global science. Paul brings her much-needed expertise in international migration and her skill as a rigorous empirical social scientist to the study of Asian scientists. At the core of Paul’s data are interviews with 119 life sciences academic scientists who received their PhDs or postdoctoral training at elite universities overseas (e.g. Harvard, Stanford, Columbia, Massachusetts Institute of Technology) and were employed at elite universities in their home or host country (e.g. Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Academia Sinica, Indian Institute of Science). While some scientists “returned” to their country of birth, others in Paul’s interview sample were “halfway-returnees” who turned to places like Singapore and Taiwan, which allowed them to be closer to family but enabled them to maintain the scientific networks cultivated while they were overseas. The book is divided into three sections. In Part I, Paul provides an overview of the recent history of science policy in the four cases she examines: Mainland China,","PeriodicalId":45255,"journal":{"name":"East Asian Science Technology and Society-An International Journal","volume":"52 1","pages":"114 - 117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East Asian Science Technology and Society-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18752160.2022.2162365","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
The imaginary of an ascendant Asia as a scientific and technological powerhouse has loomed large in public and policy debates in the United States and Europe in recent years. Increasingly, universities and research institutes in Asia are seen as competitors and innovators that have the potential to disrupt established hierarchies in the global scientific field. In Anju Mary Paul’s Asian Scientists on the Move: Changing Science in a Changing Asia, we see the transnational social lives of the scientists behind these developments and come to understand the complex decisions that shape their scientific careers and migratory decisions. Paul shows the linkages between national systems and cultures of science and the global scientific field, and identifies the agency of individual actors in raising the national profiles of their “home” and “host” countries in global science. Paul brings her much-needed expertise in international migration and her skill as a rigorous empirical social scientist to the study of Asian scientists. At the core of Paul’s data are interviews with 119 life sciences academic scientists who received their PhDs or postdoctoral training at elite universities overseas (e.g. Harvard, Stanford, Columbia, Massachusetts Institute of Technology) and were employed at elite universities in their home or host country (e.g. Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Academia Sinica, Indian Institute of Science). While some scientists “returned” to their country of birth, others in Paul’s interview sample were “halfway-returnees” who turned to places like Singapore and Taiwan, which allowed them to be closer to family but enabled them to maintain the scientific networks cultivated while they were overseas. The book is divided into three sections. In Part I, Paul provides an overview of the recent history of science policy in the four cases she examines: Mainland China,
近年来,在美国和欧洲的公共和政策辩论中,关于亚洲将崛起为科技强国的幻想显得十分突出。亚洲的大学和研究机构越来越被视为竞争者和创新者,它们有可能打破全球科学领域的既定等级制度。在Anju Mary Paul的《亚洲科学家的迁移:在变化的亚洲中改变科学》一书中,我们看到了这些发展背后科学家的跨国社会生活,并开始理解塑造他们的科学事业和迁移决定的复杂决策。Paul展示了国家科学体系和文化与全球科学领域之间的联系,并确定了个体行动者在提高其“母国”和“东道国”在全球科学中的国家形象方面的作用。保罗将她在国际移民方面急需的专业知识和她作为严谨的实证社会科学家的技能带到亚洲科学家的研究中。Paul数据的核心是对119名生命科学学术科学家的采访,他们在海外精英大学(如哈佛大学、斯坦福大学、哥伦比亚大学、麻省理工学院)接受博士或博士后培训,并在本国或东道国的精英大学(如中国科学院、南洋理工大学、中央研究院、印度科学院)工作。虽然一些科学家“回到”了他们的出生国,但在Paul的采访样本中,其他人是“中途归国”,他们转向新加坡和台湾等地,这使他们与家人更接近,但使他们能够保持在海外建立的科学网络。这本书分为三个部分。在第一部分中,保罗通过她研究的四个案例概述了科学政策的近代史:中国大陆,