Abstract A01: Gastric cancer pre-screener project: Development of a comprehensive gastric cancer risk questionnaire

H. In, Marisa Langdon-Embry, J. Wylie-Rosett, B. Rapkin
{"title":"Abstract A01: Gastric cancer pre-screener project: Development of a comprehensive gastric cancer risk questionnaire","authors":"H. In, Marisa Langdon-Embry, J. Wylie-Rosett, B. Rapkin","doi":"10.1158/1538-7755.CARISK16-A01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Gastric adenocarcinoma is the fifth most common cancer and third leading cause of cancer mortality in the world. In the US, outcomes for gastric cancer are dismal with only 28% surviving to 5 years. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is the gold standard for early detection of gastric tumors and used in countries with high prevalence for mass screening. However, due to the low prevalence of gastric cancer in the general U.S. population, a national screening program is not cost effective. Tools to identify patients at higher risk of gastric cancer may help identify subpopulations that should be referred for opportunistic screening. Purpose: To characterize the questionnaire development of a comprehensive gastric cancer risk assessment survey instrument that will be used to collect primary data in a large-scale case-control study. This primary data will be used to create a predictive model and determine items that best discriminate between gastric cases and controls, to ultimately create a simple pre-screening instrument that can be used in pre-diagnostic settings to identify at-risk patients who should be referred for upper GI endoscopy. Procedures: Phase 1) comprehensive literature review to identify established risk factors for gastric cancer. Survey instruments that established individual risks for gastric cancer were brought together to create the initial questionnaire. Phase 2) questionnaire refinement through focus groups and cognitive interviews. Focus groups were used to examine the measure for wording, layout, clarity and relevance. The item pool was then translated into Mandarin Chinese, Spanish and Korean, and cognitive interviews were conducted to ensure the questionnaire carried semantic equivalence across languages. Interview notes were aggregated on a question-by-question basis to produce a cognitive interviewing outcome report to guide questionnaire revisions. Results: A 300-item questionnaire was adapted from 16 survey instruments previously validated for gastric cancer. Identified risk factors for gastric cancer included dietary habits, demographics, racial disparities, Helicobacter pylori exposure, smoking and alcohol habits, socioeconomic status and pre-existing conditions. Only risk factors that were not hereditary and could be determined in questionnaire format were included. 29 English-speaking participants with and without gastric completed survey questions and provided feedback in focus group discussions. Participants noted items that needed clarification or simplification, or were redundant or irrelevant. Special attention was given to complex measures such as dietary history and acculturation to ensure that questions about details of ethnicity and timing of immigration were sensitive, appropriate and non-threatening. 60 gastric cancer cases and controls participated in cognitive interviews to ensure the questionnaire carried semantic equivalence across languages. Participants included 40 first-generation immigrants from Asia, Central/South America, Europe and Africa (approximately 10 in each group) and 20 US-born English speakers. Revisions included language/ethnic-specific wording to increase semantic equivalence across translations, examples to improve comprehension, and changes to instructions to improve consistent use of response options. The questionnaire underwent a total of 24 iterations during the focus group and cognitive interview processes and resulted in a 227-item questionnaire. Conclusion: A valid, comprehensible, relevant and ethnically appropriate survey instrument that comprehensively assesses all validated risk factors for gastric cancer has been developed, and will be used for primary data collection in a future case-control study aimed at ultimately creating a simple pre-screening instrument that can be used for the opportunistic screening for gastric cancer. Citation Format: Haejin In, Marisa Langdon-Embry, Judith Wylie-Rosett, Bruce Rapkin. Gastric cancer pre-screener project: Development of a comprehensive gastric cancer risk questionnaire. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Improving Cancer Risk Prediction for Prevention and Early Detection; Nov 16-19, 2016; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2017;26(5 Suppl):Abstract nr A01.","PeriodicalId":9487,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Biomarkers","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Biomarkers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7755.CARISK16-A01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Gastric adenocarcinoma is the fifth most common cancer and third leading cause of cancer mortality in the world. In the US, outcomes for gastric cancer are dismal with only 28% surviving to 5 years. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is the gold standard for early detection of gastric tumors and used in countries with high prevalence for mass screening. However, due to the low prevalence of gastric cancer in the general U.S. population, a national screening program is not cost effective. Tools to identify patients at higher risk of gastric cancer may help identify subpopulations that should be referred for opportunistic screening. Purpose: To characterize the questionnaire development of a comprehensive gastric cancer risk assessment survey instrument that will be used to collect primary data in a large-scale case-control study. This primary data will be used to create a predictive model and determine items that best discriminate between gastric cases and controls, to ultimately create a simple pre-screening instrument that can be used in pre-diagnostic settings to identify at-risk patients who should be referred for upper GI endoscopy. Procedures: Phase 1) comprehensive literature review to identify established risk factors for gastric cancer. Survey instruments that established individual risks for gastric cancer were brought together to create the initial questionnaire. Phase 2) questionnaire refinement through focus groups and cognitive interviews. Focus groups were used to examine the measure for wording, layout, clarity and relevance. The item pool was then translated into Mandarin Chinese, Spanish and Korean, and cognitive interviews were conducted to ensure the questionnaire carried semantic equivalence across languages. Interview notes were aggregated on a question-by-question basis to produce a cognitive interviewing outcome report to guide questionnaire revisions. Results: A 300-item questionnaire was adapted from 16 survey instruments previously validated for gastric cancer. Identified risk factors for gastric cancer included dietary habits, demographics, racial disparities, Helicobacter pylori exposure, smoking and alcohol habits, socioeconomic status and pre-existing conditions. Only risk factors that were not hereditary and could be determined in questionnaire format were included. 29 English-speaking participants with and without gastric completed survey questions and provided feedback in focus group discussions. Participants noted items that needed clarification or simplification, or were redundant or irrelevant. Special attention was given to complex measures such as dietary history and acculturation to ensure that questions about details of ethnicity and timing of immigration were sensitive, appropriate and non-threatening. 60 gastric cancer cases and controls participated in cognitive interviews to ensure the questionnaire carried semantic equivalence across languages. Participants included 40 first-generation immigrants from Asia, Central/South America, Europe and Africa (approximately 10 in each group) and 20 US-born English speakers. Revisions included language/ethnic-specific wording to increase semantic equivalence across translations, examples to improve comprehension, and changes to instructions to improve consistent use of response options. The questionnaire underwent a total of 24 iterations during the focus group and cognitive interview processes and resulted in a 227-item questionnaire. Conclusion: A valid, comprehensible, relevant and ethnically appropriate survey instrument that comprehensively assesses all validated risk factors for gastric cancer has been developed, and will be used for primary data collection in a future case-control study aimed at ultimately creating a simple pre-screening instrument that can be used for the opportunistic screening for gastric cancer. Citation Format: Haejin In, Marisa Langdon-Embry, Judith Wylie-Rosett, Bruce Rapkin. Gastric cancer pre-screener project: Development of a comprehensive gastric cancer risk questionnaire. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Improving Cancer Risk Prediction for Prevention and Early Detection; Nov 16-19, 2016; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2017;26(5 Suppl):Abstract nr A01.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
摘要A01:胃癌预筛查项目:编制综合性胃癌风险问卷
背景:胃腺癌是世界上第五大常见癌症和第三大癌症死亡原因。在美国,胃癌的预后令人沮丧,只有28%的患者存活至5年。上消化道内窥镜检查是早期发现胃肿瘤的金标准,在流行率高的国家用于大规模筛查。然而,由于胃癌在美国普通人群中的患病率较低,因此全国性的筛查计划并不具有成本效益。识别高风险胃癌患者的工具可能有助于确定应该进行机会性筛查的亚群。目的:描述一种综合性胃癌风险评估调查工具的问卷开发过程,该工具将用于收集大规模病例对照研究的原始数据。这些原始数据将用于创建预测模型,并确定最能区分胃病例和对照组的项目,最终创建一个简单的预筛查工具,可用于预诊断设置,以识别应转诊进行上消化道内窥镜检查的高危患者。程序:第一阶段)综合文献综述,确定胃癌的危险因素。确定个人胃癌风险的调查工具被汇集在一起,形成了最初的调查问卷。阶段2)通过焦点小组和认知访谈改进问卷。焦点小组被用来检查措辞、布局、清晰度和相关性。然后将题库翻译成汉语、西班牙语和韩语,并进行认知访谈,以确保问卷在不同语言之间具有语义对等。访谈记录按问题汇总,形成一份认知访谈结果报告,以指导问卷的修订。结果:一份300项的调查问卷改编自16种以前验证过的胃癌调查工具。确定的胃癌风险因素包括饮食习惯、人口统计学、种族差异、幽门螺杆菌暴露、吸烟和饮酒习惯、社会经济地位和既往疾病。仅包括非遗传性且可以通过问卷形式确定的危险因素。29名有或没有胃的英语参与者完成了调查问题,并在焦点小组讨论中提供了反馈。与会者注意到需要澄清或简化,或多余或不相关的项目。特别注意诸如饮食历史和文化适应等复杂措施,以确保有关种族和移民时间细节的问题敏感、适当和不具威胁性。对60例胃癌患者和对照组进行认知访谈,以确保问卷在不同语言间语义对等。参与者包括40名来自亚洲、中美洲/南美洲、欧洲和非洲的第一代移民(每组约10人)和20名在美国出生说英语的人。修订包括语言/种族特定的措辞,以增加翻译之间的语义等效,示例,以提高理解,并改变说明,以提高一致使用的回应选项。在焦点小组和认知访谈过程中,问卷共经历了24次迭代,最终形成了一份227项的问卷。结论:已开发出一种有效、可理解、相关且符合民族要求的调查工具,可全面评估所有经验证的胃癌危险因素,并将在未来的病例对照研究中用于主要数据收集,旨在最终创建一种简单的预筛查工具,可用于胃癌的机会性筛查。引文格式:Haejin In, Marisa Langdon-Embry, Judith Wylie-Rosett, Bruce Rapkin。胃癌预筛查项目:制定综合性胃癌风险问卷。[摘要]。摘自:AACR特别会议论文集:改进癌症风险预测以预防和早期发现;2016年11月16日至19日;费城(PA): AACR;Cancer epidemiology Biomarkers pre2017;26(5增刊):摘要nr A01。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Abstract PO-083: A qualitative examination of race, racism, residential segregation and cancer survivorship among Black and Hispanic women Abstract PO-095: Comparative analysis of breast tumor microbiome in Black non-Hispanic (BNH) and White non-Hispanic (WNH) women Abstract A119: Ethnic and sex differences in exposure to traffic-related air pollutants and lung cancer incidence: The Multiethnic Cohort Abstract A051: Race and gender differences in awareness of colorectal cancer screening tests among recently diagnosed colon cancer Abstract B004: Capacity development among patient navigators to enhance colorectal cancer control in American Indian-serving healthcare facilities in the U.S. Southwest and Southern Plains
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1