Ontological Foundations of Competition

T. P. Sales, Daniele Porello, Nicola Guarino, G. Guizzardi, J. Mylopoulos
{"title":"Ontological Foundations of Competition","authors":"T. P. Sales, Daniele Porello, Nicola Guarino, G. Guizzardi, J. Mylopoulos","doi":"10.3233/978-1-61499-910-2-96","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is widely recognized that accurately identifying and classifying competitors is a challenge for many companies and entrepreneurs. Nonetheless, it is a paramount activity which provide valuable insights that affect a wide range of strategic decisions. One of the main challenges in competitor identification lies in the complex nature of the competitive relationships that arise in business environments. These have been extensively investigate over the years, which lead to a plethora of competition theories and frameworks. Still, the concept of competition remains conceptually complex, as none of these approaches properly formalized their assumptions. In this paper, we address this issue by means of an ontological analysis on the notion of competition in general, and of business competition, in particular, leveraging theories from various fields, including Marketing, Strategic Management, Ecology, Psychology and Cognitive Sciences. Our analysis, the first of its kind in the literature, is grounded on the Unified Foundational Ontology (UFO) and allows us to formally characterize why competition arises, as well as to distinguish between three types of business competitive relationships, namely market-level, firm-level and potential competition.","PeriodicalId":90829,"journal":{"name":"Formal ontology in information systems : proceedings of the ... International Conference. FOIS (Conference)","volume":"49 1","pages":"96-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Formal ontology in information systems : proceedings of the ... International Conference. FOIS (Conference)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-910-2-96","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

It is widely recognized that accurately identifying and classifying competitors is a challenge for many companies and entrepreneurs. Nonetheless, it is a paramount activity which provide valuable insights that affect a wide range of strategic decisions. One of the main challenges in competitor identification lies in the complex nature of the competitive relationships that arise in business environments. These have been extensively investigate over the years, which lead to a plethora of competition theories and frameworks. Still, the concept of competition remains conceptually complex, as none of these approaches properly formalized their assumptions. In this paper, we address this issue by means of an ontological analysis on the notion of competition in general, and of business competition, in particular, leveraging theories from various fields, including Marketing, Strategic Management, Ecology, Psychology and Cognitive Sciences. Our analysis, the first of its kind in the literature, is grounded on the Unified Foundational Ontology (UFO) and allows us to formally characterize why competition arises, as well as to distinguish between three types of business competitive relationships, namely market-level, firm-level and potential competition.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
竞争的本体论基础
人们普遍认为,对许多公司和企业家来说,准确地识别和分类竞争对手是一项挑战。尽管如此,它是一项重要的活动,它提供了影响广泛战略决策的有价值的见解。竞争对手识别的主要挑战之一在于商业环境中出现的竞争关系的复杂性。多年来,人们对这些问题进行了广泛的研究,从而产生了大量的竞争理论和框架。尽管如此,竞争的概念在概念上仍然很复杂,因为这些方法都没有正确地形式化它们的假设。在本文中,我们通过对竞争概念的本体论分析来解决这个问题,特别是商业竞争,特别是利用来自各个领域的理论,包括市场营销,战略管理,生态学,心理学和认知科学。我们的分析是文献中的第一个此类分析,它以统一基础本体(UFO)为基础,并允许我们正式描述竞争产生的原因,以及区分三种类型的商业竞争关系,即市场层面、公司层面和潜在竞争。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fiat Surfaces in the Basic Formal Ontology. Axiomatizing SNOMED CT Disorders: Should There Be Room for Interpretation? Asymmetric Hybrids: Dialogues for Computational Concept Combination Debugging Classical Ontologies Using Defeasible Reasoning Tools Towards a Unified Dispositional Framework for Realizable Entities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1