Financing Common Goods for Health: A Country Agenda

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Systems & Reform Pub Date : 2019-10-02 DOI:10.1080/23288604.2019.1659126
Susan P Sparkes, Joseph Kutzin, Alexandra J Earle
{"title":"Financing Common Goods for Health: A Country Agenda","authors":"Susan P Sparkes, Joseph Kutzin, Alexandra J Earle","doi":"10.1080/23288604.2019.1659126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Collective financing, in the form of either public domestic revenues or pooled donor funding, at the country level is necessary to finance common goods for health, which are population-based functions or interventions that contribute to health and have the characteristics of public goods. Financing of common goods for health is an important part of policy efforts to move towards Universal Health Coverage (UHC). This paper builds from country experiences and budget documents to provide an evidence-based argument about how government and donor financing can be reorganized to enable more efficient delivery of common goods for health. Issues related to fragmentation of financing—within the health sector, across sectors, and across levels of government—emerge as key constraints. Effectively addressing fragmentation issues requires: (i) pooling funding and consolidating governance structures to repackage functions across programs; (ii) aligning budgets with efficient delivery strategies to enable intersectoral approaches and related accountability structures; and (iii) coordinating and incentivizing investments across levels of government. This policy response is both technical in nature and also highly political as it requires realigning budgets and organizational structures.","PeriodicalId":46168,"journal":{"name":"Health Systems & Reform","volume":"73 1","pages":"322 - 333"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Systems & Reform","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23288604.2019.1659126","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Abstract Collective financing, in the form of either public domestic revenues or pooled donor funding, at the country level is necessary to finance common goods for health, which are population-based functions or interventions that contribute to health and have the characteristics of public goods. Financing of common goods for health is an important part of policy efforts to move towards Universal Health Coverage (UHC). This paper builds from country experiences and budget documents to provide an evidence-based argument about how government and donor financing can be reorganized to enable more efficient delivery of common goods for health. Issues related to fragmentation of financing—within the health sector, across sectors, and across levels of government—emerge as key constraints. Effectively addressing fragmentation issues requires: (i) pooling funding and consolidating governance structures to repackage functions across programs; (ii) aligning budgets with efficient delivery strategies to enable intersectoral approaches and related accountability structures; and (iii) coordinating and incentivizing investments across levels of government. This policy response is both technical in nature and also highly political as it requires realigning budgets and organizational structures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为卫生共同产品筹资:国家议程
摘要:在国家一级,必须以国内公共收入或汇集捐助者资金的形式进行集体筹资,以资助促进健康的共同利益,这是基于人口的职能或干预措施,有助于健康并具有公共利益的特点。卫生共同物品融资是实现全民健康覆盖的政策努力的重要组成部分。本文以国家经验和预算文件为基础,就如何重组政府和捐助者的筹资方式,以便更有效地提供卫生领域的共同产品提出了基于证据的论证。在卫生部门内部、跨部门和各级政府之间,与融资分散有关的问题成为主要制约因素。有效解决碎片化问题需要:(i)集中资金和巩固治理结构,以便跨项目重新打包功能;使预算与有效的执行战略保持一致,以实现部门间办法和有关的问责制结构;(三)协调和激励各级政府的投资。这一政策反应在本质上既是技术性的,也是高度政治性的,因为它需要重新调整预算和组织结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
9.80%
发文量
35
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Strengths and Weaknesses of Strategic Health Purchasing for Universal Health Coverage in Rwanda Strategic Health Purchasing Progress Mapping: A Spotlight on Ghana’s National Health Insurance Scheme Strategic Health Purchasing in Nigeria: Investigating Governance and Institutional Capacities within Federal Tax-Funded Health Schemes and the Formal Sector Social Health Insurance Programme Integrating Venezuelan Migrants into the Colombian Health System during COVID-19 Decentralization Can Improve Equity, but Can It Be Sustained?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1