Small for gestational age: A risk factor for the development of hypertension in childhood?

Shreyas A Surpure, Shobha Sharma, Sonal Saste, N. Kabra, S. Bavdekar
{"title":"Small for gestational age: A risk factor for the development of hypertension in childhood?","authors":"Shreyas A Surpure, Shobha Sharma, Sonal Saste, N. Kabra, S. Bavdekar","doi":"10.32677/ijch.v9i2.3287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There is conflicting evidence regarding the association of elevated blood pressure and SGA status. Most of the studies showing positive association have demonstrated this association in children aged above 7 years. \nObjectives: To determine if there is a significant difference between the proportion of children aged 3-5 years, born-SGA and those born-AGA developing hypertension. \nMethodology: The observational cross-sectional study was carried out at a private tertiary care hospital. Clinically healthy children (age: 3-5 years) were enrolled and grouped as those who born-SGA and those who were born AGA. Blood pressure was recorded with oscillometric device and procedure was repeated three times at an interval of at least 10 minutes. The mean of three blood pressure recordings was considered as the participant’s true blood pressure. The demographic characteristics of the study population were summarized using descriptive statistics. Categorical outcomes were compared by using Chi square or Fischer exact test. For continuous outcomes, ‘t test’ was used. P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. \nResults: The study enrolled 27 SGA-born children and 27 AGA-born children. Nine children (33.33%) in the SGA group and one child (3.7%) in the AGA group developed hypertension (p= 0.011).  The systolic blood pressure in the SGA group (103.20±8.62 mmHg) was significantly higher than that in the AGA group (98.58±6.60 mmHg) (p=0.031). The diastolic blood pressure (mean ± SD) in the SGA group was 62.75 ± 9.19 mm Hg. There was no significant difference between the diastolic blood pressures in the two groups (AGA: 59.00±5.11mm Hg, SGA: 62.75 ± 9.19; p= 0.07). \nConclusion: Being born SGA was thus found to be a risk factor for hypertension in 3-5 years old children.","PeriodicalId":22476,"journal":{"name":"The Indian journal of child health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Indian journal of child health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32677/ijch.v9i2.3287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is conflicting evidence regarding the association of elevated blood pressure and SGA status. Most of the studies showing positive association have demonstrated this association in children aged above 7 years. Objectives: To determine if there is a significant difference between the proportion of children aged 3-5 years, born-SGA and those born-AGA developing hypertension. Methodology: The observational cross-sectional study was carried out at a private tertiary care hospital. Clinically healthy children (age: 3-5 years) were enrolled and grouped as those who born-SGA and those who were born AGA. Blood pressure was recorded with oscillometric device and procedure was repeated three times at an interval of at least 10 minutes. The mean of three blood pressure recordings was considered as the participant’s true blood pressure. The demographic characteristics of the study population were summarized using descriptive statistics. Categorical outcomes were compared by using Chi square or Fischer exact test. For continuous outcomes, ‘t test’ was used. P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The study enrolled 27 SGA-born children and 27 AGA-born children. Nine children (33.33%) in the SGA group and one child (3.7%) in the AGA group developed hypertension (p= 0.011).  The systolic blood pressure in the SGA group (103.20±8.62 mmHg) was significantly higher than that in the AGA group (98.58±6.60 mmHg) (p=0.031). The diastolic blood pressure (mean ± SD) in the SGA group was 62.75 ± 9.19 mm Hg. There was no significant difference between the diastolic blood pressures in the two groups (AGA: 59.00±5.11mm Hg, SGA: 62.75 ± 9.19; p= 0.07). Conclusion: Being born SGA was thus found to be a risk factor for hypertension in 3-5 years old children.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胎龄小:儿童高血压发生的危险因素?
背景:关于血压升高与SGA状态的关系,有相互矛盾的证据。大多数显示正相关的研究表明,这种关联存在于7岁以上的儿童中。目的:确定3-5岁儿童、出生为sga的儿童和出生为aga的儿童患高血压的比例是否存在显著差异。方法:观察性横断面研究在一家私立三级保健医院进行。临床健康儿童(年龄:3-5岁)被纳入并分为出生时为sga的儿童和出生时为AGA的儿童。用示波仪记录血压,每隔至少10分钟重复3次。三次血压记录的平均值被认为是参与者的真实血压。研究人群的人口学特征采用描述性统计进行总结。分类结果的比较采用卡方检验或Fischer精确检验。对于连续结果,使用“t检验”。P值小于0.05认为有统计学意义。结果:本研究纳入了27例sga出生的儿童和27例aga出生的儿童。SGA组9例(33.33%)、AGA组1例(3.7%)发生高血压(p= 0.011)。SGA组收缩压(103.20±8.62 mmHg)明显高于AGA组(98.58±6.60 mmHg) (p=0.031)。SGA组舒张压(平均±SD)为62.75±9.19 mm Hg,两组舒张压差异无统计学意义(AGA: 59.00±5.11mm Hg, SGA: 62.75±9.19;p = 0.07)。结论:出生时SGA是3-5岁儿童高血压的危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical and etiopathological profile of pancytopenia in children (1-18 years): A study from tertiary care center of Bundelkhand region, central India Urinary tract infection in pediatric patients – Recent updates Pediatric autism spectrum disorder: Role of yoga prana vidya system as complementary medicine in accelerating patient progress An observational study to evaluate weight gain of exclusively breastfed infants who feed only while sleeping Fibular hemimelia in a neonate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1