Have changes in business practices and reporting standards changed the taxonomy of financial ratios

IF 1.1 Q4 BUSINESS American Journal of Business Pub Date : 2016-08-08 DOI:10.1108/AJB-10-2015-0030
T. Zeller, John Kostolansky, Michail Bozoudis
{"title":"Have changes in business practices and reporting standards changed the taxonomy of financial ratios","authors":"T. Zeller, John Kostolansky, Michail Bozoudis","doi":"10.1108/AJB-10-2015-0030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – Prior research established a seven dimensional taxonomy of financial ratios. The purpose of this paper is to identify the extent to which the previously identified relationships have changed, and if appropriate, to establish an entirely new taxonomy of manufacturing industry financial ratios. Design/methodology/approach – The authors used principle component analysis (PCA) to identify factor patterns for 58 financial ratios over the ten-year period 2004-2013. The validity of employing PCA was confirmed using the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of sampling adequacy and Bartlett’s test of sphericity. Findings – This study identified four additional financial analysis factors beyond the seven established by prior research. Notably, a separate cash flow factor did not surface as was the case in earlier work but an entirely new factor (current position) was identified. Research limitations/implications – This paper leaves to future research to establish the precise causes for the changes to the taxonomy o...","PeriodicalId":44116,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Business","volume":"29 1","pages":"85-97"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/AJB-10-2015-0030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Purpose – Prior research established a seven dimensional taxonomy of financial ratios. The purpose of this paper is to identify the extent to which the previously identified relationships have changed, and if appropriate, to establish an entirely new taxonomy of manufacturing industry financial ratios. Design/methodology/approach – The authors used principle component analysis (PCA) to identify factor patterns for 58 financial ratios over the ten-year period 2004-2013. The validity of employing PCA was confirmed using the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of sampling adequacy and Bartlett’s test of sphericity. Findings – This study identified four additional financial analysis factors beyond the seven established by prior research. Notably, a separate cash flow factor did not surface as was the case in earlier work but an entirely new factor (current position) was identified. Research limitations/implications – This paper leaves to future research to establish the precise causes for the changes to the taxonomy o...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
商业惯例和报告标准的变化是否改变了财务比率的分类
目的-先前的研究建立了财务比率的七个维度分类。本文的目的是确定之前确定的关系已经改变的程度,如果合适的话,建立一个全新的制造业财务比率分类法。设计/方法/方法-作者使用主成分分析(PCA)来识别2004-2013年十年间58个财务比率的因素模式。使用Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin抽样充分性测量和Bartlett球形检验来证实主成分分析的有效性。研究结果-本研究确定了四个额外的财务分析因素,超出了先前研究确定的七个因素。值得注意的是,没有像早期工作那样出现单独的现金流量因素,而是确定了一个全新的因素(当前位置)。研究的局限性/启示-本文留给未来的研究,以建立准确的原因变化的分类…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
期刊最新文献
Deep pockets or empty coffers? Functional expenses, contribution revenue and the ability of nonprofits to pivot during COVID-19 CEO political ideology and credit risk assessment Investor attention during soccer World Cups Entrepreneurial Resilience in the Micro and Small Business Context – Systematic Literature Review A Practical Guide to Writing Performance Appraisals and Letters of Recommendation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1