Frustration, exploration, and learning.

P. Wong
{"title":"Frustration, exploration, and learning.","authors":"P. Wong","doi":"10.1037/H0081509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"D. E. Berlyne's principle that uncertainty leads to exploration is extended to situations involving frustrativc nonreward. Both empirical evidence and logical analysis support the frustration-exploration hypothesis, which posits that uncertain frustration leads to exploration, whose primary function is to broaden the scope of response selection. The facilitative effects of frustration-motivated exploration in learning are documented, and their implications for education are discussed. One of Daniel Berlyne's abiding interests was in curiosity and exploration. Perhaps, among his many significant contributions to psychology, his work in this area has made the greatest impact. His 1960 monograph Conflict, Arousal and Curiosity is among the 100 books most cited by social scientists (Garfield, 1978). Few will disagree that it is mainly due to Berlyne's influence that exploration or information seeking has been elevated to the same status as hedonism as one of the primary sources of motivation. In view of the prevalence of information seeking (Berlyne, 1966), a case may be made that it is a more important motivation than the pursuit of hedonic goals. In paying tributes to Berlyne, I cannot help but reminisce on the good old days of being a graduate student at the University of Toronto, when both Daniel Berlyne and Abram Amsel were on the psychology faculty. To be taught by these two eminent psychologists was to be influenced by them in a profound way. Although different in many ways in their approaches to research, both of them demonstrated a remarkable degree of independence of thought in the midst of shifting paradigms and changing fashions in psychological research. While Amsel concentrated his Portions of this paper were presented in a symposium in honour of the late D. E. Berlyne at the Canadian Psychological Association Meeting in Vancouver, July, 1977. The paper was written while the author was a visiting scholar at the University of California, Los Angeles. It was supported by Grant 3A0701 from the National Research Council of Canada, and a Canada Council Leave Fellowship. Requests for reprints should be addressed to P. T. P. Wong, Department of Psychology, Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario, K9J 7B8. research efforts in well defined problem areas, Berlyne's own curiosity led him to explore new frontiers in psychology. One learned from Amsel how to rigorously and thoroughly investigate a phenomenon; one learned from Berlyne how to see old problems in new lights and how to detect connections in seemingly unrelated areas of research. Both of these approaches have influenced my own research career, and these influences have contributed to the present paper which attempts to interface frustration and exploration. In the past ten years, I have done several studies on the problem of persistence and frustration, even though such research no longer attracts the attention it once did. Having carefully observed hundreds of rats in a great variety of frustrating situations, I cannot help but notice the prevalence of exploratory behaviour. For example, in a runway situation, partial reinforcement increases sniffing, exploration of irrelevant holes on the runway walls, and variation of routes leading to the goalbox (Wong 1977a, 1978a). In this article, I will document the existing evidence supporting the frustration-exploration hypothesis. More specifically, I will attempt to demonstrate that (1) uncertain frustration leads to exploration, (2) frustration-motivated exploration primarily consists of response-variation, and (3) this type of exploration plays an important role in instrumental learning. However, before we examine the evidence and arguments in support of the frustration-exploration hypothesis, we should first examine exploration as a concept and past research on this topic.","PeriodicalId":80882,"journal":{"name":"Canadian psychological review. Psychologie canadienne","volume":"34 1","pages":"133-144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1979-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"38","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian psychological review. Psychologie canadienne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/H0081509","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

Abstract

D. E. Berlyne's principle that uncertainty leads to exploration is extended to situations involving frustrativc nonreward. Both empirical evidence and logical analysis support the frustration-exploration hypothesis, which posits that uncertain frustration leads to exploration, whose primary function is to broaden the scope of response selection. The facilitative effects of frustration-motivated exploration in learning are documented, and their implications for education are discussed. One of Daniel Berlyne's abiding interests was in curiosity and exploration. Perhaps, among his many significant contributions to psychology, his work in this area has made the greatest impact. His 1960 monograph Conflict, Arousal and Curiosity is among the 100 books most cited by social scientists (Garfield, 1978). Few will disagree that it is mainly due to Berlyne's influence that exploration or information seeking has been elevated to the same status as hedonism as one of the primary sources of motivation. In view of the prevalence of information seeking (Berlyne, 1966), a case may be made that it is a more important motivation than the pursuit of hedonic goals. In paying tributes to Berlyne, I cannot help but reminisce on the good old days of being a graduate student at the University of Toronto, when both Daniel Berlyne and Abram Amsel were on the psychology faculty. To be taught by these two eminent psychologists was to be influenced by them in a profound way. Although different in many ways in their approaches to research, both of them demonstrated a remarkable degree of independence of thought in the midst of shifting paradigms and changing fashions in psychological research. While Amsel concentrated his Portions of this paper were presented in a symposium in honour of the late D. E. Berlyne at the Canadian Psychological Association Meeting in Vancouver, July, 1977. The paper was written while the author was a visiting scholar at the University of California, Los Angeles. It was supported by Grant 3A0701 from the National Research Council of Canada, and a Canada Council Leave Fellowship. Requests for reprints should be addressed to P. T. P. Wong, Department of Psychology, Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario, K9J 7B8. research efforts in well defined problem areas, Berlyne's own curiosity led him to explore new frontiers in psychology. One learned from Amsel how to rigorously and thoroughly investigate a phenomenon; one learned from Berlyne how to see old problems in new lights and how to detect connections in seemingly unrelated areas of research. Both of these approaches have influenced my own research career, and these influences have contributed to the present paper which attempts to interface frustration and exploration. In the past ten years, I have done several studies on the problem of persistence and frustration, even though such research no longer attracts the attention it once did. Having carefully observed hundreds of rats in a great variety of frustrating situations, I cannot help but notice the prevalence of exploratory behaviour. For example, in a runway situation, partial reinforcement increases sniffing, exploration of irrelevant holes on the runway walls, and variation of routes leading to the goalbox (Wong 1977a, 1978a). In this article, I will document the existing evidence supporting the frustration-exploration hypothesis. More specifically, I will attempt to demonstrate that (1) uncertain frustration leads to exploration, (2) frustration-motivated exploration primarily consists of response-variation, and (3) this type of exploration plays an important role in instrumental learning. However, before we examine the evidence and arguments in support of the frustration-exploration hypothesis, we should first examine exploration as a concept and past research on this topic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
挫折、探索和学习。
D. E. Berlyne关于不确定性导致探索的原则也适用于包含挫败性无奖励的情境。经验证据和逻辑分析都支持挫折-探索假说,该假说认为不确定的挫折导致探索,其主要功能是扩大反应选择的范围。本文记录了挫折动机探索在学习中的促进作用,并讨论了它们对教育的影响。丹尼尔·柏林长久以来的兴趣之一就是好奇和探索。也许,在他对心理学的许多重要贡献中,他在这一领域的工作影响最大。他1960年的专著《冲突、觉醒和好奇心》是被社会科学家引用最多的100本书之一(加菲尔德,1978)。很少有人会不同意,这主要是由于柏林的影响,探索或信息寻求已经被提升到与享乐主义一样的地位,成为动机的主要来源之一。鉴于信息寻求的盛行(Berlyne, 1966),我们可以认为这是一个比追求享乐目标更重要的动机。在向柏林致敬的同时,我不禁回想起在多伦多大学(University of Toronto)读研究生的美好时光,当时丹尼尔•柏林和亚伯兰•阿姆塞尔(abraham Amsel)都在心理学系任教。受这两位著名心理学家的教导,是受到他们深刻的影响。尽管他们的研究方法在许多方面有所不同,但在心理学研究范式和时尚不断变化的过程中,他们都表现出了显著的思想独立性。1977年7月,在温哥华举行的加拿大心理协会会议上,Amsel在纪念已故的d.e. Berlyne的研讨会上发表了他的部分论文。这篇论文是作者在加州大学洛杉矶分校做访问学者时写的。它得到了加拿大国家研究委员会的补助金3A0701和加拿大委员会休假奖学金的支持。如需转载,请寄p.t.p. Wong,特伦特大学心理学系,安大略省彼得伯勒,邮编:K9J 7B8。在明确界定的问题领域的研究工作中,Berlyne自己的好奇心促使他探索心理学的新领域。人们从Amsel那里学会了如何严格而彻底地调查一种现象;一个人从柏林学到了如何用新的眼光看待老问题,以及如何发现看似无关的研究领域之间的联系。这两种方法都影响了我自己的研究生涯,而这些影响也促成了本文试图将挫折和探索结合起来。在过去的十年里,我做了一些关于坚持和挫折问题的研究,尽管这些研究不再像以前那样引起人们的关注。在仔细观察了数百只老鼠在各种令人沮丧的情况下的表现后,我不禁注意到它们普遍存在的探索行为。例如,在跑道情况下,部分加固增加了嗅探,探索跑道壁上不相关的洞,以及通往球门的路线变化(Wong 1977a, 1978a)。在本文中,我将记录支持挫折探索假说的现有证据。更具体地说,我将试图证明:(1)不确定的挫折导致探索,(2)挫折动机的探索主要由反应变化组成,(3)这种类型的探索在工具性学习中起着重要作用。然而,在我们研究支持挫折探索假说的证据和论据之前,我们应该首先研究探索作为一个概念和过去对这一主题的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Legal issues and behaviour modification: A Canadian perspective. Frustration, exploration, and learning. Practise wise: Five faces of ethical issues. Behavioural medicine: Preview of an emerging field. Eight social psychology texts: A citations analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1