Investigation of CO2 Storage Security Increase by Brine Alternative CO2 Injection WAG_CCS

Mahmoudreza Jazayeri Noushabadi, A. Brisset, S. Thibeau
{"title":"Investigation of CO2 Storage Security Increase by Brine Alternative CO2 Injection WAG_CCS","authors":"Mahmoudreza Jazayeri Noushabadi, A. Brisset, S. Thibeau","doi":"10.2118/193250-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage (CCUS) accounts for around 14% of the cumulative emissions reductions needed through 2050 (IEA, 2016) in its 2°C scenario. Deep saline aquifers were recognized as the largest potential storage resource available worldwide for CO2 storage into geological formations. Securing the geological storage of CO2 is mandatory with this kind of project. Indeed, under specific conditions, the resulting pressure build-up of a CO2 injection into an aquifer can possibly lead to leak into shallow geological aquifers or atmosphere through preferential pathways such as geological faults and wells. The brine extraction is envisaged to decrease the reservoir pressure build-up while injecting CO2. In this study, an investigation was made to use a part of this extracted brine to increase the CO2 storage security by accelerating both residual and solubility trapping mechanisms through the deployment of water (W) alternative CO2 (G) injection (WAG_CCS) at field scale. If this alternative CO2 injection process gives interesting results, then this approach will also lead to the reduction of the duration of post-injection site monitoring. In addition, the WAG_CCS process may help increasing the sweep efficiency of CO2 by controlling the mobility ratio and consequently improving the storage capacity.\n Several WAG_CCS pattern models were simulated with Eclipse software to investigate the impact of the method. A real geological model of an aquifer (Sleipner model, public data) was used for the simulations. As simulation base case, the CO2 is injected into the aquifer through one injection well for a period of 25 years followed by a 3500 years post injection simulation. Several other injection scenarios are simulated where water (W) is extracted from the same formation and partly reinjected alternatively with CO2 (G). The injection period schedules are as follow: 3months(G)-3months(W) to 1year(G)-1year(W). The mobile gas volume (structural trapping) and residual gas volume and dissolved gas volume (solubility trapping) are compared for all simulated cases.\n An experimental design screening was implemented in order to investigate the impact of several parameters such as well numbers, permeability, critical gas saturation…\n The results of this study gave answers to the WAG_CCS process efficiency in CO2 geological storage. It can be concluded that it can (1) be efficient under realistic geological conditions; (2) speed up the capillary trapping mechanism; (3) accelerate the dissolution trapping mechanism; (4) control the CO2 mobility and increase the sweep efficiency of CO2; and (5) help to manage project risks.\n The water extraction from an aquifer during the CO2 storage is a subject which was already studied and proposed in several publications but the utilization of the extracted water is still a research subject. Extracted water desalinization, reinjection in depleted formations, surface dissolution of CO2 within the extracted water before injection are some of investigated subjects.","PeriodicalId":11014,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, November 12, 2018","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, November 12, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/193250-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage (CCUS) accounts for around 14% of the cumulative emissions reductions needed through 2050 (IEA, 2016) in its 2°C scenario. Deep saline aquifers were recognized as the largest potential storage resource available worldwide for CO2 storage into geological formations. Securing the geological storage of CO2 is mandatory with this kind of project. Indeed, under specific conditions, the resulting pressure build-up of a CO2 injection into an aquifer can possibly lead to leak into shallow geological aquifers or atmosphere through preferential pathways such as geological faults and wells. The brine extraction is envisaged to decrease the reservoir pressure build-up while injecting CO2. In this study, an investigation was made to use a part of this extracted brine to increase the CO2 storage security by accelerating both residual and solubility trapping mechanisms through the deployment of water (W) alternative CO2 (G) injection (WAG_CCS) at field scale. If this alternative CO2 injection process gives interesting results, then this approach will also lead to the reduction of the duration of post-injection site monitoring. In addition, the WAG_CCS process may help increasing the sweep efficiency of CO2 by controlling the mobility ratio and consequently improving the storage capacity. Several WAG_CCS pattern models were simulated with Eclipse software to investigate the impact of the method. A real geological model of an aquifer (Sleipner model, public data) was used for the simulations. As simulation base case, the CO2 is injected into the aquifer through one injection well for a period of 25 years followed by a 3500 years post injection simulation. Several other injection scenarios are simulated where water (W) is extracted from the same formation and partly reinjected alternatively with CO2 (G). The injection period schedules are as follow: 3months(G)-3months(W) to 1year(G)-1year(W). The mobile gas volume (structural trapping) and residual gas volume and dissolved gas volume (solubility trapping) are compared for all simulated cases. An experimental design screening was implemented in order to investigate the impact of several parameters such as well numbers, permeability, critical gas saturation… The results of this study gave answers to the WAG_CCS process efficiency in CO2 geological storage. It can be concluded that it can (1) be efficient under realistic geological conditions; (2) speed up the capillary trapping mechanism; (3) accelerate the dissolution trapping mechanism; (4) control the CO2 mobility and increase the sweep efficiency of CO2; and (5) help to manage project risks. The water extraction from an aquifer during the CO2 storage is a subject which was already studied and proposed in several publications but the utilization of the extracted water is still a research subject. Extracted water desalinization, reinjection in depleted formations, surface dissolution of CO2 within the extracted water before injection are some of investigated subjects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
盐水替代注CO2提高CO2储存安全性的研究WAG_CCS
在2°C情景下,到2050年(IEA, 2016年),碳捕集、利用和封存(CCUS)约占所需累计减排量的14%。深盐水层被认为是世界范围内最大的潜在储层,可以将二氧化碳储存到地质构造中。在这类项目中,确保二氧化碳的地质储存是必须的。事实上,在特定条件下,向含水层注入二氧化碳所产生的压力可能会导致二氧化碳通过地质断层和井等优先途径泄漏到浅层地质含水层或大气中。在注入二氧化碳的同时,盐水提取可以减少储层压力的累积。在本研究中,研究人员通过在油田规模上部署水(W)替代二氧化碳(G)注入(WAG_CCS),利用部分提取的盐水加速残留和溶解度捕获机制,提高二氧化碳储存的安全性。如果这种替代的CO2注射工艺产生了有趣的结果,那么这种方法也将减少注射后现场监测的持续时间。此外,WAG_CCS过程可以通过控制迁移率来提高CO2的扫描效率,从而提高储存容量。用Eclipse软件模拟了几个WAG_CCS模式模型,以研究该方法的影响。模拟使用了一个真实的含水层地质模型(Sleipner模型,公开数据)。作为模拟基本情况,通过一口注入井将二氧化碳注入含水层,为期25年,然后进行3500年的注入后模拟。模拟了其他几种注入方案,从同一地层中提取水(W),部分再注入二氧化碳(G)。注入周期计划如下:3个月(G)-3个月(W)至1年(G)-1年(W)。对所有模拟情况下的可动气量(构造圈闭)、剩余气量和溶解气量(溶解度圈闭)进行了比较。通过实验设计筛选,考察了井数、渗透率、临界含气饱和度等参数对CO2地质封存过程效率的影响。可以得出结论:(1)在实际地质条件下是有效的;(2)加快毛细管捕集机制;(3)加速溶蚀捕获机制;(4)控制CO2迁移率,提高CO2的扫气效率;(5)有助于管理项目风险。在CO2封存过程中从含水层中抽取水已经在一些出版物中进行了研究和提出,但抽取水的利用仍然是一个研究课题。采出水脱盐、衰竭地层回注、注入前采出水中CO2的表面溶解是研究的课题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does the kappa number method accurately reflect lignin content in nonwood pulps? Using multistage models to evaluate how pulp washing after the first extraction stage impacts elemental chlorine-free bleach demand Understanding the risks and rewards of using 50% vs. 10% strength peroxide in pulp bleach plants Understanding the pulping and bleaching performances of eucalyptus woods affected by physiological disturbance Measurements of the Inorganic Scale Buildup Rate on Downhole Completion Equipment – Debris Barrier Screens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1