Digital inequality in disconnection practices: voluntary nonuse during COVID-19

IF 0.8 Q3 COMMUNICATION Fonseca-Journal of Communication Pub Date : 2023-07-08 DOI:10.1093/joc/jqad021
M. Nguyen, E. Hargittai
{"title":"Digital inequality in disconnection practices: voluntary nonuse during COVID-19","authors":"M. Nguyen, E. Hargittai","doi":"10.1093/joc/jqad021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The pervasiveness of digital media renders people constantly connected. Digital inequality theory tends to focus on how socio-digital factors link to technology access, skills, uses, and opportunities derived from such use. It is not clear, however, whether this theoretical lens applies to a time of heightened connection when privilege may also explain intended disconnection. Drawing on data from 1,551 U.S. adults surveyed during the pandemic, we find that younger age, higher education, frequent Internet use, less dependable access, and better skills are related to partaking in voluntary nonuse (e.g., having technology-free moments, switching off the Internet). As digital disconnection emerges from a place of socio-digital privilege as well as disadvantage, in a society of technology abundance, new inequalities arise around who has the freedom to use it in moderation rather than use it at all. Our study extends theoretical notions from digital inequality to the realm of voluntary digital nonuse.","PeriodicalId":53925,"journal":{"name":"Fonseca-Journal of Communication","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fonseca-Journal of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqad021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The pervasiveness of digital media renders people constantly connected. Digital inequality theory tends to focus on how socio-digital factors link to technology access, skills, uses, and opportunities derived from such use. It is not clear, however, whether this theoretical lens applies to a time of heightened connection when privilege may also explain intended disconnection. Drawing on data from 1,551 U.S. adults surveyed during the pandemic, we find that younger age, higher education, frequent Internet use, less dependable access, and better skills are related to partaking in voluntary nonuse (e.g., having technology-free moments, switching off the Internet). As digital disconnection emerges from a place of socio-digital privilege as well as disadvantage, in a society of technology abundance, new inequalities arise around who has the freedom to use it in moderation rather than use it at all. Our study extends theoretical notions from digital inequality to the realm of voluntary digital nonuse.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
断网实践中的数字不平等:COVID-19期间自愿不使用
数字媒体的普及使人们不断地联系在一起。数字不平等理论倾向于关注社会数字因素如何与技术获取、技能、使用以及由此产生的机会联系起来。然而,尚不清楚这一理论视角是否适用于高度联系的时代,因为特权也可以解释有意的分离。根据大流行期间对1551名美国成年人的调查数据,我们发现年龄较小、受教育程度较高、频繁使用互联网、访问不太可靠、技能较好与自愿不使用(例如,拥有无技术时刻、关闭互联网)有关。在一个拥有社会数字特权和劣势的地方,随着数字脱节的出现,在一个技术丰富的社会中,围绕谁有适度使用它的自由而不是根本使用它,出现了新的不平等。我们的研究将理论概念从数字不平等扩展到自愿不使用数字的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Two faces of message repetition: audience favorability as a determinant of the explanatory capacities of processing fluency and message fatigue Deictic Strategies in KamaNu and Karimi’s Kimeru Song and Dance Lyrics Digital inequality in disconnection practices: voluntary nonuse during COVID-19 Media stereotypes, prejudice, and preference-based reinforcement: toward the dynamic of self-reinforcing effects by integrating audience selectivity Introduction to the special issue of social media: the good, the bad, and the ugly
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1