Comparison between Effects of Midazolam and Dexmedetomidine as Sedative in Elective Caesarean Section under Spinal Anaesthesia

M. E. Karim, Ram Mustafijur Rashid, Mohammad Saleh Akram Akram, R. Ershad
{"title":"Comparison between Effects of Midazolam and Dexmedetomidine as Sedative in Elective Caesarean Section under Spinal Anaesthesia","authors":"M. E. Karim, Ram Mustafijur Rashid, Mohammad Saleh Akram Akram, R. Ershad","doi":"10.3329/cbmj.v12i1.64365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This randomized clinical trial compares midazolam and dexmedetomidine in terms of onset and recovery of sedation, haemodynamic effects, respiratory effects, and adverse effects of both the drugs in elective Caesarian section under spinal anaesthesia. The study included 60 ASA grade-I patients between age 20- and 40-years undergoing elective Caesarean sections under subarachnoid anaesthesia, from January 2022 to June 2022. Patients were randomly allocated to one of the two groups: midazolam group (Group-I, n=30), who received midazolam in a single dose of 0.10mg/kg and Dexmedetomidine group (Group-II, n=30), who received dexmedetomidine in a single dose of 2mcg/kg. Spinal anaesthesia was conducted by injecting a hyperbaric solution of 0.5% bupivacaine 3ml through a 25G spinal needle at L3-4 level. All parameters were documented at 5-minute intervals until arousal of the patient. The onset of sedation i.e., time from IV (intravenous) injection of Midazolam or Dexmedetomidine to closure of eye lids (OAA/S score of 3) and the arousal time from sedation i.e., time from closing of the eye lids to OAA/S score of 5 (patient is awake clinically) were noted. Any complication during operation was documented. The patient’s satisfaction with the sedation was assessed by the 5-point ‘Likert verbal rating scale’. There was no significant difference of mean blood pressure and mean heart rate between the two groups at different time intervals (P>0.05). Time of onset of sedation was significantly delayed in dexmedetomidine group (P<0.05). Duration of sedation was comparable between the two groups (P>0.05). Incidence of peroperative complications were comparable between the two groups (P>0.05). Haemodynamic effects and adverse effects of two drugs were comparable. Therefore, it is recommended that either midazolam or dexmedetomidine can be used for sedation in single dose technique during subarachnoid block for Caesarean section. \nCBMJ 2023 January: Vol. 12 No. 01 P: 99-106","PeriodicalId":10576,"journal":{"name":"Community Based Medical Journal","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community Based Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/cbmj.v12i1.64365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This randomized clinical trial compares midazolam and dexmedetomidine in terms of onset and recovery of sedation, haemodynamic effects, respiratory effects, and adverse effects of both the drugs in elective Caesarian section under spinal anaesthesia. The study included 60 ASA grade-I patients between age 20- and 40-years undergoing elective Caesarean sections under subarachnoid anaesthesia, from January 2022 to June 2022. Patients were randomly allocated to one of the two groups: midazolam group (Group-I, n=30), who received midazolam in a single dose of 0.10mg/kg and Dexmedetomidine group (Group-II, n=30), who received dexmedetomidine in a single dose of 2mcg/kg. Spinal anaesthesia was conducted by injecting a hyperbaric solution of 0.5% bupivacaine 3ml through a 25G spinal needle at L3-4 level. All parameters were documented at 5-minute intervals until arousal of the patient. The onset of sedation i.e., time from IV (intravenous) injection of Midazolam or Dexmedetomidine to closure of eye lids (OAA/S score of 3) and the arousal time from sedation i.e., time from closing of the eye lids to OAA/S score of 5 (patient is awake clinically) were noted. Any complication during operation was documented. The patient’s satisfaction with the sedation was assessed by the 5-point ‘Likert verbal rating scale’. There was no significant difference of mean blood pressure and mean heart rate between the two groups at different time intervals (P>0.05). Time of onset of sedation was significantly delayed in dexmedetomidine group (P<0.05). Duration of sedation was comparable between the two groups (P>0.05). Incidence of peroperative complications were comparable between the two groups (P>0.05). Haemodynamic effects and adverse effects of two drugs were comparable. Therefore, it is recommended that either midazolam or dexmedetomidine can be used for sedation in single dose technique during subarachnoid block for Caesarean section. CBMJ 2023 January: Vol. 12 No. 01 P: 99-106
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
咪达唑仑与右美托咪定在脊髓麻醉下择期剖宫产术中的镇静效果比较
这项随机临床试验比较了咪达唑仑和右美托咪定在脊髓麻醉下择期剖宫产中镇静的起效和恢复、血流动力学效应、呼吸效应和不良反应。该研究包括60名年龄在20至40岁之间的ASA i级患者,于2022年1月至2022年6月在蛛网膜下腔麻醉下进行选择性剖腹产。患者随机分为两组:咪达唑仑组(i组,n=30),咪达唑仑单次剂量0.10mg/kg;右美托咪定组(ii组,n=30),右美托咪定单次剂量2mcg/kg。脊髓麻醉通过25G脊髓针在L3-4水平注射0.5%布比卡因3ml高压溶液。每隔5分钟记录一次所有参数,直到患者醒来。记录镇静起效时间,即从静脉注射咪达唑仑或右美托咪定至闭眼时间(OAA/S评分为3分)和镇静唤醒时间,即闭眼时间至OAA/S评分为5分(患者临床清醒)。记录手术过程中任何并发症。患者对镇静的满意度通过5分“李克特口头评定量表”进行评估。两组在不同时间间隔的平均血压、平均心率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。右美托咪定组患者镇静起效时间明显延迟(P0.05)。两组手术并发症发生率比较,差异有统计学意义(P>0.05)。两种药物的血流动力学效应和不良反应具有可比性。因此,建议剖宫产术蛛网膜下腔阻滞时单剂量镇静可选用咪达唑仑或右美托咪定。中华医学杂志2023 1月12期01期P: 99-106
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of Topical Cyclosporine A (0.05%) in Treatment of Corneal Subepithelial Infiltrates after Adenoviral Keratoconjunctivitis Characterization of Axillary Lymph Nodes Using Conventional Ultrasonography Compared with Histopathological Findings Correlation between the Maximum Length and the Weight of the Human Humerus Bone Cognitive Performance of the Elderly People in an Urban Area of Bangladesh: A Sociodemographic Study Pelvic Stress Fracture among Naval Cadets in Bangladesh
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1