Research: Learning to Teach Writing by Becoming a Writer: An Examination of Preservice Teachers’ Engagement with the Writing Process

Ann D. David, Stephanie A. Grote-Garcia, I. Trout, Susan Hall, Letitia Harding
{"title":"Research: Learning to Teach Writing by Becoming a Writer: An Examination of Preservice Teachers’ Engagement with the Writing Process","authors":"Ann D. David, Stephanie A. Grote-Garcia, I. Trout, Susan Hall, Letitia Harding","doi":"10.58680/ee202232130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Finding ways to develop preservice teachers (PSTs) as both writers and teachers of writing can be a heavy lift for teacher education programs. This article presents a portion of the data from a larger study undertaken as longitudinal, formative design research. Data were gathered from 410 PSTs over a three-year period across four courses in teacher education and English language arts at a private liberal arts university in a southwestern state. Two research questions guided the study: (1) How do preservice teachers engage in practices grounded in process discourse in the context of their teacher education courses?; and (2) How do preservice teachers’ beliefs about their writing self-efficacy change during a semester of engaging in writing with a focus on process discourse? Key findings of the study included PSTs engaging in prewriting activities (e.g., reading, researching) but engaging less in writing while preparing to write (e.g., quicklist, webs). Furthermore, the PSTs utilized peers in revising writing but did not visit those with the most knowledge and skill in supporting writing (e.g., professor, writing center). Finally, PSTs’ confidence in their writing, which was higher at the start of courses than previous research often indicates, decreased across their time in the courses.","PeriodicalId":53044,"journal":{"name":"Getsempena English Education Journal","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Getsempena English Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58680/ee202232130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Finding ways to develop preservice teachers (PSTs) as both writers and teachers of writing can be a heavy lift for teacher education programs. This article presents a portion of the data from a larger study undertaken as longitudinal, formative design research. Data were gathered from 410 PSTs over a three-year period across four courses in teacher education and English language arts at a private liberal arts university in a southwestern state. Two research questions guided the study: (1) How do preservice teachers engage in practices grounded in process discourse in the context of their teacher education courses?; and (2) How do preservice teachers’ beliefs about their writing self-efficacy change during a semester of engaging in writing with a focus on process discourse? Key findings of the study included PSTs engaging in prewriting activities (e.g., reading, researching) but engaging less in writing while preparing to write (e.g., quicklist, webs). Furthermore, the PSTs utilized peers in revising writing but did not visit those with the most knowledge and skill in supporting writing (e.g., professor, writing center). Finally, PSTs’ confidence in their writing, which was higher at the start of courses than previous research often indicates, decreased across their time in the courses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究:通过成为一名作家来学习教授写作:职前教师参与写作过程的检验
找到培养职前教师(pst)既能写作又能教授写作的方法,对教师教育项目来说是一项艰巨的任务。这篇文章提出了数据的一部分,从一个更大的研究进行纵向,形成性设计研究。研究人员在美国西南部一个州的一所私立文理大学对410名学生进行了为期三年的调查,涉及教师教育和英语语言艺术四门课程。两个研究问题指导了本研究:(1)职前教师如何在其教师教育课程的背景下从事基于过程话语的实践?(2)在以过程语篇为重点的一个学期的写作中,职前教师对写作自我效能感的信念是如何变化的?该研究的主要发现包括pst参与写作前的活动(如阅读、研究),但在准备写作时参与写作的较少(如快速列表、网络)。此外,PSTs利用同伴来修改写作,但没有拜访那些在写作方面最有知识和技能的人(如教授、写作中心)。最后,pst对写作的信心,在课程开始时通常比之前的研究表明的要高,随着课程的进行而下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Hots Manifestation in English Summative Assessment the Max Pzoras’ Character Development in Karan Bajaj’s the Yoga of Max’s Discontent EFL Students' Language Learning Strategies at Argumentative Writing Class at UNIROW Tuban An Analysis of the Violation of Maxims in “Just Friends” Webtoon by CL Nuna Psychological distance in language learning: a case study in higher education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1