Developing a multi-criteria decision support system based on fuzzy analytical hierarchical process (AHP) method for selection of appropriate high-strength wastewater treatment plant

A. H. Moghaddam, J. Shayegan
{"title":"Developing a multi-criteria decision support system based on fuzzy analytical hierarchical process (AHP) method for selection of appropriate high-strength wastewater treatment plant","authors":"A. H. Moghaddam, J. Shayegan","doi":"10.22104/AET.2020.4100.1202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The selection of an optimum treatment process for high-strength wastewater is complicated. Familiarity with wastewater treatment methods is not enough to design a plant and requires a multidisciplinary knowledge base. In this research, five alternative wastewater treatment methods for high-strength wastewater were investigated and ranked based on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) fuzzy method: upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) + membrane bioreactor (MBR), UASB + extended aeration (EA), anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR), anaerobic lagoon (ANL) + aerated lagoon (AL), and sequencing batch reactor (SBR) + ABR. These treatment methods were ranked based on five criteria, namely energy consumption, effluent total suspended solids (TSS), effluent chemical oxygen demand (COD), cost, and level of technology. The different options of the wastewater treatment plant were rated by expert decision-makers in this field. The results show that for typical high-strength wastewater, the use of an UASB reactor followed by a MBR is the most appropriate alternative for treating the wastewater.","PeriodicalId":7295,"journal":{"name":"Advances in environmental science and technology","volume":"30 1","pages":"99-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in environmental science and technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22104/AET.2020.4100.1202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The selection of an optimum treatment process for high-strength wastewater is complicated. Familiarity with wastewater treatment methods is not enough to design a plant and requires a multidisciplinary knowledge base. In this research, five alternative wastewater treatment methods for high-strength wastewater were investigated and ranked based on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) fuzzy method: upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) + membrane bioreactor (MBR), UASB + extended aeration (EA), anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR), anaerobic lagoon (ANL) + aerated lagoon (AL), and sequencing batch reactor (SBR) + ABR. These treatment methods were ranked based on five criteria, namely energy consumption, effluent total suspended solids (TSS), effluent chemical oxygen demand (COD), cost, and level of technology. The different options of the wastewater treatment plant were rated by expert decision-makers in this field. The results show that for typical high-strength wastewater, the use of an UASB reactor followed by a MBR is the most appropriate alternative for treating the wastewater.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发了一种基于模糊层次分析法的多准则决策支持系统,用于选择合适的高强度污水处理厂
高强度废水的最佳处理工艺选择比较复杂。熟悉污水处理方法是不够的,设计一个工厂,需要多学科的知识基础。本研究采用层次分析法(AHP)对5种不同的高强度废水处理方法进行了研究,并采用模糊排序法对其进行了排序:上流式厌氧污泥毯(UASB) +膜生物反应器(MBR)、UASB +延长曝气(EA)、厌氧挡板反应器(ABR)、厌氧泻湖(ANL) +曝气泻湖(AL)、序批式反应器(SBR) + ABR。根据能耗、出水总悬浮固体(TSS)、出水化学需氧量(COD)、成本和技术水平等5个标准对这些处理方法进行了排名。该领域的专家决策者对污水处理厂的不同选择进行了评级。结果表明,对于典型的高强度废水,采用UASB + MBR处理是最合适的方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Statistical analysis of tropospheric ozone and its precursors using principal component analysis in an urban area of Surat, India The effects of different materials of green roofing on the quantity and quality of stored and drainage water by using simulated rainfall setup The CO2 removal of flue gas using hollow fiber membrane contactor: a comprehensive modeling and new perspectives Social Cost of CO2 emissions in Tehran Waste Management Scenarios and select the scenario based on least impact on Global Warming by using Life Cycle Assessment Surface Ignition Using Ethanol on Mo and Al2O3-TiO2 Coated in CI Engine for Environmental Benefits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1