Covering Former ISIS Fighters: A Framing Analysis of the Repatriation of Ex-ISIS in the Online Coverage of Kompas and Republika

Lilik Hamidah, Mevy Eka Nurhalizah
{"title":"Covering Former ISIS Fighters: A Framing Analysis of the Repatriation of Ex-ISIS in the Online Coverage of Kompas and Republika","authors":"Lilik Hamidah, Mevy Eka Nurhalizah","doi":"10.15642/jki.2020.10.1.26-45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses how Kompas.com and Republika.co.id framed the coverage of the repatriation of ex-ISIS members to Indonesia. This study was a qualitative study using the approach of Robert N. Entman framing analysis model. The findings revealed that Kompas.com and Republika Online framed the return of the former ex-ISIS fighters to Indonesia differently in terms of the selection of news sources, legal analysis, and approval. Kompas.com tended to choose state officials to be a source to conduct analysis based on state law and reject repatriation of ex-ISIS. Meanwhile, Republika Online tended to select religious leaders to analyse based on Islamic law and allowed them to repatriate to this country. In other words, Kompas.com focused on the principle of humanism, while Republika Online more emphasised on Islam values and nationalism in their news coverage.","PeriodicalId":31785,"journal":{"name":"AtTabsyir Jurnal Komunikasi Penyiaran Islam","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AtTabsyir Jurnal Komunikasi Penyiaran Islam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15642/jki.2020.10.1.26-45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper discusses how Kompas.com and Republika.co.id framed the coverage of the repatriation of ex-ISIS members to Indonesia. This study was a qualitative study using the approach of Robert N. Entman framing analysis model. The findings revealed that Kompas.com and Republika Online framed the return of the former ex-ISIS fighters to Indonesia differently in terms of the selection of news sources, legal analysis, and approval. Kompas.com tended to choose state officials to be a source to conduct analysis based on state law and reject repatriation of ex-ISIS. Meanwhile, Republika Online tended to select religious leaders to analyse based on Islamic law and allowed them to repatriate to this country. In other words, Kompas.com focused on the principle of humanism, while Republika Online more emphasised on Islam values and nationalism in their news coverage.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
报道前ISIS战士:《Kompas》和《Republika》在线报道中前ISIS遣返的框架分析
本文讨论了Kompas.com和Republika.co.id如何对前isis成员遣返印度尼西亚的报道进行框架。本研究采用Robert N. Entman框架分析模型的方法进行定性研究。调查结果显示,Kompas.com和Republika Online在选择新闻来源、法律分析和批准方面,对前isis武装分子返回印度尼西亚的说法不同。Kompas.com倾向于选择州政府官员作为来源,根据州法律进行分析,并拒绝遣返前isis。同时,Republika Online倾向于根据伊斯兰法律选择宗教领袖进行分析,并允许他们遣返回国。换句话说,Kompas.com注重人文主义原则,而Republika Online则在新闻报道中更强调伊斯兰价值观和民族主义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Deradicalization Narratives from Former Convicts in the Digital Space: Sofyan Tsauri’s YouTube Channel Analysis Kontestasi Media Digital: Analisis Tagar #BubarkanMUI versus #DukungMUI Reformulation of Da’wah Communication Paradigm in the Post-Pandemic Era Konstruksi Gender dalam Media Islam dan Sekuler COMMUNICATING SUFI TEACHINGS IN 21ST CENTURY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1