The role of trabecular bone score, inaddition to FRAX, for the measurementof fracture risk in patients withdegenerative lumbar spine stenosis

H. A. Aldaoseri
{"title":"The role of trabecular bone score, inaddition to FRAX, for the measurementof fracture risk in patients withdegenerative lumbar spine stenosis","authors":"H. A. Aldaoseri","doi":"10.37532/1758-4272.2021.16(6).172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To investigate the relevance of Concomitant Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) and Areal Bone Mineral Density (aBMD) assessments to estimate fracture risk in patients with Degenerative Lumbar Spine Stenosis (DLSS). Methods: A cross-sectional prospective study was performed. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry scans of the lumbar spine and hip were acquired in 50 patients with DLSS. TBS and aBMD were calculated from the anteroposterior views of L1-L4 vertebrae. The World Health Organisation Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) was utilised to estimate hip or Major Osteoporotic Fracture (MOF) risk. Results: L1-L4 TBS scores revealed degraded microarchitecture, (TBS ≤ 1.20), partially degraded microarchitecture (TBS >1.20 and <1.35) or normal appearances (TBS ≥ 1.35) in 9 (18%), 14 (28%) and 27 (54%) patients, respectively. L1-L4 aBMD assessment demonstrated osteoporosis (T-score ≤- 2.5), osteopenia (T-score between -1.1 and -2.4) or normal bone density in 15 (30%), 11 (22%) and 24 (48%) patients, respectively. There was no relationship seen between L1-L4 aBMD and TBS measurements (r = 0.046; p = 0.75). A negative relationship was observed between TBS and body mass index (r = -0.438; p = 0.001) andbetween L1-L4 aBMD and FRAX (r = -0.617; p < 0.001); the latter included MOF and risk of hip fracture (r = -0.497; p < 0.001).No relationship was observed between TBS and FRAX included MOF and risk of hip fracture (r = -0.118; p = 0.416 and r = -0.014; p = 0.926, respectively) Conclusion: In patients with DLSS, TBS is a reliable, strong and standalone indicator of fracture risk","PeriodicalId":13740,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Rheumatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37532/1758-4272.2021.16(6).172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the relevance of Concomitant Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) and Areal Bone Mineral Density (aBMD) assessments to estimate fracture risk in patients with Degenerative Lumbar Spine Stenosis (DLSS). Methods: A cross-sectional prospective study was performed. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry scans of the lumbar spine and hip were acquired in 50 patients with DLSS. TBS and aBMD were calculated from the anteroposterior views of L1-L4 vertebrae. The World Health Organisation Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) was utilised to estimate hip or Major Osteoporotic Fracture (MOF) risk. Results: L1-L4 TBS scores revealed degraded microarchitecture, (TBS ≤ 1.20), partially degraded microarchitecture (TBS >1.20 and <1.35) or normal appearances (TBS ≥ 1.35) in 9 (18%), 14 (28%) and 27 (54%) patients, respectively. L1-L4 aBMD assessment demonstrated osteoporosis (T-score ≤- 2.5), osteopenia (T-score between -1.1 and -2.4) or normal bone density in 15 (30%), 11 (22%) and 24 (48%) patients, respectively. There was no relationship seen between L1-L4 aBMD and TBS measurements (r = 0.046; p = 0.75). A negative relationship was observed between TBS and body mass index (r = -0.438; p = 0.001) andbetween L1-L4 aBMD and FRAX (r = -0.617; p < 0.001); the latter included MOF and risk of hip fracture (r = -0.497; p < 0.001).No relationship was observed between TBS and FRAX included MOF and risk of hip fracture (r = -0.118; p = 0.416 and r = -0.014; p = 0.926, respectively) Conclusion: In patients with DLSS, TBS is a reliable, strong and standalone indicator of fracture risk
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
除FRAX外,小梁骨评分在测量退行性腰椎狭窄患者骨折风险中的作用
目的:探讨合并骨小梁评分(TBS)和面积骨矿物质密度(aBMD)评估在评估退行性腰椎管狭窄症(DLSS)患者骨折风险中的相关性。方法:横断面前瞻性研究。对50例DLSS患者进行腰椎和髋关节双能x线吸收仪扫描。从L1-L4椎体正位面计算TBS和aBMD。使用世界卫生组织骨折风险评估工具(FRAX)来评估髋部或主要骨质疏松性骨折(MOF)的风险。结果:L1-L4 TBS评分显示微结构退化(TBS≤1.20)、微结构部分退化(TBS >1.20和<1.35)或外观正常(TBS≥1.35)的患者分别为9例(18%)、14例(28%)和27例(54%)。L1-L4 aBMD评估分别显示15例(30%)、11例(22%)和24例(48%)患者骨质疏松(t评分≤- 2.5)、骨质减少(t评分在-1.1至-2.4之间)或骨密度正常。L1-L4 aBMD与TBS测量无相关性(r = 0.046;P = 0.75)。TBS与体重指数呈负相关(r = -0.438;p = 0.001), L1-L4 aBMD与FRAX之间(r = -0.617;P < 0.001);后者包括MOF和髋部骨折风险(r = -0.497;P < 0.001)。TBS和FRAX包括MOF与髋部骨折风险之间没有关系(r = -0.118;P = 0.416, r = -0.014;p = 0.926)结论:在DLSS患者中,TBS是一项可靠、有力且独立的骨折风险指标
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Severe coronal re-infection and issuesof mechanisms, monitoring and therapy Treatment patterns and costs ofpatients with ankylosing spondylitisinitiating biologic therapy in taiwan ??? apopulation-based analysis Effectiveness of adalimumab versus infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: A randomized double blinded clinical trial Synovitis with pitting edema as the presenting manifestation of antisynthetase syndrome Demographic, clinical, and serological features of Iraqi patients with rheumatoid arthritis: evaluation of 470 patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1