Changing or Acknowledging Cognitions: A Meta-Analysis of Reducing Depression in Adolescence

IF 1.7 3区 心理学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders Pub Date : 2023-02-26 DOI:10.1177/10634266231154209
Şeyma Uluköylü, Patty Leijten, M. Assink
{"title":"Changing or Acknowledging Cognitions: A Meta-Analysis of Reducing Depression in Adolescence","authors":"Şeyma Uluköylü, Patty Leijten, M. Assink","doi":"10.1177/10634266231154209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Negative cognitions play a key role in the development and maintenance of depression. To reduce depressive symptoms, most interventions either encourage adolescents to change negative cognitions, theorizing that the presence of negative cognitions underlies depression, or to acknowledge negative cognitions, theorizing that one’s reaction to negative cognitions underlies depression. We compared these two therapeutic strategies in a multilevel meta-analysis of the effects of changing versus acknowledging cognitions on adolescent depression. We searched three databases in June 2022 and identified 104 randomized controlled trials (335 effect sizes). The sample comprised 27,978 adolescents (sample mean age 14−18 years) with all levels of depressive symptoms ( Mage = 15.6 years; 63% female; 65% ethnic majority). The overall effect of interventions on depression was small ( d = 0.21, p < .001). We found no evidence that either strategy was superior to the other. Strategies to acknowledge ( d = 0.23, p = .016) or change cognitions ( d = 0.20, p < .001) both reduced adolescent depression. Our findings suggest, though based on self-reported outcomes, that both strategies are effective in reducing adolescent depression, which allows for flexibility for clinicians and patients. The next step to further understand these strategies is to scrutinize the relative effects of single versus combined approaches to change and acknowledge negative cognitions.","PeriodicalId":47557,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10634266231154209","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Negative cognitions play a key role in the development and maintenance of depression. To reduce depressive symptoms, most interventions either encourage adolescents to change negative cognitions, theorizing that the presence of negative cognitions underlies depression, or to acknowledge negative cognitions, theorizing that one’s reaction to negative cognitions underlies depression. We compared these two therapeutic strategies in a multilevel meta-analysis of the effects of changing versus acknowledging cognitions on adolescent depression. We searched three databases in June 2022 and identified 104 randomized controlled trials (335 effect sizes). The sample comprised 27,978 adolescents (sample mean age 14−18 years) with all levels of depressive symptoms ( Mage = 15.6 years; 63% female; 65% ethnic majority). The overall effect of interventions on depression was small ( d = 0.21, p < .001). We found no evidence that either strategy was superior to the other. Strategies to acknowledge ( d = 0.23, p = .016) or change cognitions ( d = 0.20, p < .001) both reduced adolescent depression. Our findings suggest, though based on self-reported outcomes, that both strategies are effective in reducing adolescent depression, which allows for flexibility for clinicians and patients. The next step to further understand these strategies is to scrutinize the relative effects of single versus combined approaches to change and acknowledge negative cognitions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改变或承认认知:减少青少年抑郁的荟萃分析
消极认知在抑郁症的发展和维持中起着关键作用。为了减轻抑郁症状,大多数干预措施要么鼓励青少年改变消极认知,从理论上认为消极认知的存在是抑郁的基础,要么承认消极认知,从理论上认为一个人对消极认知的反应是抑郁的基础。我们对改变认知与承认认知对青少年抑郁症的影响进行了多层次荟萃分析,比较了这两种治疗策略。我们于2022年6月检索了三个数据库,确定了104个随机对照试验(335个效应量)。样本包括27,978名青少年(样本平均年龄14 - 18岁),有不同程度的抑郁症状(年龄= 15.6岁;63%的女性;占65%的少数民族)。干预措施对抑郁症的总体影响较小(d = 0.21, p < 0.001)。我们没有发现任何证据表明哪一种策略优于另一种策略。承认策略(d = 0.23, p = 0.016)和改变认知策略(d = 0.20, p < 0.001)均可降低青少年抑郁。我们的研究结果表明,尽管基于自我报告的结果,但这两种策略在减少青少年抑郁症方面都是有效的,这给临床医生和患者提供了灵活性。进一步了解这些策略的下一步是仔细检查改变和承认消极认知的单一方法和联合方法的相对效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
10.50%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: The Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders publishes quality scholarship related to individuals with emotional and behavioral disorders. Articles represent a wide range of disciplines, including counseling, education, early childhood care, juvenile corrections, mental health, psychiatry, psychology, public health, rehabilitation, social work, and special education. Articles on characteristics, assessment, prevention, intervention, treatment, legal or policy issues, and evaluation are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Association Between Emotion Regulation and Body Image Concerns in a Group of Adolescent Boys: Interaction With the Internalization of the Sociocultural Body Ideal. Moving Targets and Missed Opportunities: Being Honest With Teachers and Ourselves Initial Development of the Child Responsiveness Scale for Early Childhood Settings Teacher Self-Efficacy Beliefs and Burnout: The Mediating Roles of Interpersonal Mindfulness in Teaching and Emotion Regulation Understanding the Relationship Between Race and Career Intent of Teachers Serving Students With Emotional and Behavior Disorders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1