A comparative study of the expectoration effect by breath training device and pursed lip breathing in patients with AECOPD

Ping Zhang, Feng Yang, Yin-huan Li, Ni Liu, Jieying Hu, Wenshuai Duan, Yanfei Cao, Huiyin Xu, C. Duan, Rongchang Chen, N. Zhong, Zeguang Zheng
{"title":"A comparative study of the expectoration effect by breath training device and pursed lip breathing in patients with AECOPD","authors":"Ping Zhang, Feng Yang, Yin-huan Li, Ni Liu, Jieying Hu, Wenshuai Duan, Yanfei Cao, Huiyin Xu, C. Duan, Rongchang Chen, N. Zhong, Zeguang Zheng","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1673-436X.2020.05.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo observe and compare the expectoration effect of breath training device and the pursed lip breathing in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). \n \n \nMethods \nForty patients hospitalized because of AECOPD were consecutively observed from March 2018 to May 2018.The patients were randomly divided into two groups in which sputum inducted respectively by breath training device or pursed lip breathing for observing the expectoration effect of the breath training device and the pursed lip breathing. \n \n \nResults \nDuring the intervention period of both breath training device and pursed lip breathing, the total volumes expelled and their pure sputum volumes of the two groups were significantly higher than those before the intervention (breath training device group: all P<0.01; pursed lip breathing group: all P<0.05), and the increase of sputum volume by breath training device was more significant than that by pursed lip breathing (P< 0.05); the ratio of sputum water component volume to total sputum volume in the breath training device group was also significantly increased than that before the intervention (P<0.01). The cough difficulty and sputum properties in the breath training device group were significantly improved compared with those before intervention (all P<0.05), and the viscosity of sputum in the trainer group was higher than that before intervention (P<0.05), but all of cough difficulty, sputum properties and viscosity of sputum did not in the pursed lip breathing group.After finishing of the intervention, the total sputum volume and pure sputum volume in the two groups were lower than those before the intervention.Although the viscosity of sputum in the two groups were higher than those before intervention, and the viscosity of sputum in the breath training device group was much higher than that in the pursed lip breathing group, the cough difficulty and sputum properties were significantly improved than those before and during the intervention. \n \n \nConclusions \nBoth breath training device and the pursed lip breathing can help patients with AECOPD to expel phlegm.Breath training device can promote the hydration of phlegm, improve the characteristics of phlegm and speed up the discharge of phlegm. \n \n \nKey words: \nRespiratory rehabilitation; Acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; Expectoration; Pursed lip breathing","PeriodicalId":10004,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Asthma","volume":"48 1","pages":"349-354"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Asthma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1673-436X.2020.05.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To observe and compare the expectoration effect of breath training device and the pursed lip breathing in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). Methods Forty patients hospitalized because of AECOPD were consecutively observed from March 2018 to May 2018.The patients were randomly divided into two groups in which sputum inducted respectively by breath training device or pursed lip breathing for observing the expectoration effect of the breath training device and the pursed lip breathing. Results During the intervention period of both breath training device and pursed lip breathing, the total volumes expelled and their pure sputum volumes of the two groups were significantly higher than those before the intervention (breath training device group: all P<0.01; pursed lip breathing group: all P<0.05), and the increase of sputum volume by breath training device was more significant than that by pursed lip breathing (P< 0.05); the ratio of sputum water component volume to total sputum volume in the breath training device group was also significantly increased than that before the intervention (P<0.01). The cough difficulty and sputum properties in the breath training device group were significantly improved compared with those before intervention (all P<0.05), and the viscosity of sputum in the trainer group was higher than that before intervention (P<0.05), but all of cough difficulty, sputum properties and viscosity of sputum did not in the pursed lip breathing group.After finishing of the intervention, the total sputum volume and pure sputum volume in the two groups were lower than those before the intervention.Although the viscosity of sputum in the two groups were higher than those before intervention, and the viscosity of sputum in the breath training device group was much higher than that in the pursed lip breathing group, the cough difficulty and sputum properties were significantly improved than those before and during the intervention. Conclusions Both breath training device and the pursed lip breathing can help patients with AECOPD to expel phlegm.Breath training device can promote the hydration of phlegm, improve the characteristics of phlegm and speed up the discharge of phlegm. Key words: Respiratory rehabilitation; Acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; Expectoration; Pursed lip breathing
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
AECOPD患者使用呼吸训练器与闭口呼吸祛痰效果的比较研究
目的观察并比较呼吸训练器与闭口呼吸对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(AECOPD)急性加重期患者的祛痰效果。方法对2018年3月至5月住院的40例AECOPD患者进行连续观察。将患者随机分为两组,分别采用呼吸训练器吸痰和唇瓣呼吸法吸痰,观察呼吸训练器和唇瓣呼吸法的排痰效果。结果在呼吸训练器和噘嘴呼吸干预期间,两组患者的总排出量和纯痰量均显著高于干预前(呼吸训练器组:均P<0.01;闭口呼吸组:均P<0.05),且呼吸训练器组痰量的增加显著高于闭口呼吸组(P< 0.05);呼吸训练器组痰液水成分体积与总痰液体积之比也显著高于干预前(P<0.01)。呼吸训练器组患者咳嗽困难程度和痰液性质均较干预前显著改善(均P<0.05),痰液粘度高于干预前(P<0.05),而闭口呼吸组患者咳嗽困难程度、痰液性质和痰液粘度均无显著差异。干预结束后,两组患者的总痰量和纯痰量均低于干预前。虽然两组患者痰液粘度均高于干预前,且呼吸训练器组痰液粘度远高于闭口呼吸组,但咳嗽困难程度和痰液性质均较干预前和干预期间有明显改善。结论呼吸训练器和闭口呼吸均能促进AECOPD患者的痰排出。呼吸训练器可以促进痰的水化,改善痰的特性,加快痰的排出。关键词:呼吸康复;慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期;吐痰;噘嘴呼吸
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Research progress of obstructive sleep apneahypopnea syndrome and coronary heart disease The relationship between obstructive sleep apnea and optic neuropathy Correlationship between oxidative damage and IP-10, Rantes in lung cancer patients Correlation between NADPH oxidase 4 and epithelial mesenchymal transformation in non-small cell lung cancer Efficacy and safety of intravenous antibiotics combined with inhalation of amikacin versus intravenous antibiotics for treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1