Assessment Instruments of Decision-Making Capacity

Christopher W Racine, S. Billick
{"title":"Assessment Instruments of Decision-Making Capacity","authors":"Christopher W Racine, S. Billick","doi":"10.1177/009318531204000209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Capacity to consent to informed treatment decisions is an often overlooked, yet tremendously critical, aspect of modern medical practice. Despite its importance, research has shown that clinicians often fail to identify patients who lack capacity. Currently, other than a clinical psychiatric consultation and evaluation, there is no standardized method for determining whether a patient has capacity to make treatment decisions. Cognitive scales, such as the MMSE, may inform capacity evaluations but are neither sensitive nor specific. Accordingly, various clinical instruments have been developed to aid in the determination of capacity to consent to treatment. This is a review of several of these instruments. While there is no convincing evidence for the use of a particular scale, the CQ and ACE are easy to administer and can be efficiently utilized by clinicians to inform capacity assessment. While more time consuming to administer and score, the MacCAT-T also provides a comprehensive evaluation of key capacity domains.","PeriodicalId":83131,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of psychiatry & law","volume":"95 1","pages":"243 - 263"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of psychiatry & law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/009318531204000209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Capacity to consent to informed treatment decisions is an often overlooked, yet tremendously critical, aspect of modern medical practice. Despite its importance, research has shown that clinicians often fail to identify patients who lack capacity. Currently, other than a clinical psychiatric consultation and evaluation, there is no standardized method for determining whether a patient has capacity to make treatment decisions. Cognitive scales, such as the MMSE, may inform capacity evaluations but are neither sensitive nor specific. Accordingly, various clinical instruments have been developed to aid in the determination of capacity to consent to treatment. This is a review of several of these instruments. While there is no convincing evidence for the use of a particular scale, the CQ and ACE are easy to administer and can be efficiently utilized by clinicians to inform capacity assessment. While more time consuming to administer and score, the MacCAT-T also provides a comprehensive evaluation of key capacity domains.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
决策能力评估工具
在现代医疗实践中,知情同意治疗决定的能力是一个经常被忽视,但又极其关键的方面。尽管它很重要,但研究表明,临床医生往往无法识别缺乏能力的患者。目前,除了临床精神病学咨询和评估之外,没有标准化的方法来确定患者是否有能力做出治疗决定。认知量表,如MMSE,可以为能力评估提供信息,但既不敏感也不具体。因此,开发了各种临床工具,以帮助确定同意治疗的能力。这是对其中几种仪器的回顾。虽然没有令人信服的证据支持使用特定的量表,但CQ和ACE易于管理,临床医生可以有效地利用它们来进行能力评估。虽然管理和评分更耗时,但MacCAT-T还提供了对关键能力领域的全面评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association of Subclinical Hearing Loss With Cognitive Performance. Robert L. Sadoff, M.D.: A Festschrift Criminal Law Standards in Civil Commitment “Justice's Beautiful Face”: Bob Sadoff and the Redemptive Promise of Therapeutic Jurisprudence On Honesty and Integrity in Forensic Science: A Snapshot of Robert L. Sadoff, M.D.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1