ADVERSE DRUG REACTION REPORTING PRACTICES BY HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS OF KARACHI, PAKISTAN: A QUALITATIVE SURVEY

S. Zaheer, Andaleeb Komal, A. Akhlaq
{"title":"ADVERSE DRUG REACTION REPORTING PRACTICES BY HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS OF KARACHI, PAKISTAN: A QUALITATIVE SURVEY","authors":"S. Zaheer, Andaleeb Komal, A. Akhlaq","doi":"10.46903/gjms/19.01.943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The safety of medications is of utmost concern for public health. In developed countries, adverse drug reaction reporting systems are well established, but in low-income and middle-income countries such as Pakistan, these are under-developed and ignored. The objective of this qualitative survey was to explore the adverse drug reaction reporting practices by health care professionals of Karachi, Pakistan. \n\nMaterials & Methods: Fifteen health care professionals (HCPs), including physicians, nurses and pharmacists from public, semi-private and private tertiary care hospitals were selected using purposive and snowball sampling for semi-structured interviews. Interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim, and were analyzed using Thematic Analysis. \n\nResults: The results showed that almost all HCPs have a good understanding of ADR, but did not know the procedures of ADR reporting to the Drug Regulatory Authority of Pakistan (DRAP). Usually, the ADR was manually reported, with few hospitals having an electronic ADR reporting system. Barriers to the ADR reporting included a large influx of illiterate patients, over-burdened staff, lack of financial and technological resources, and ineffective administration. Facilitator to ADR reporting was electronic ADR system. \n\nConclusion: These findings would help the policymakers and health administrators to revise existing policies and devise new ones for the adoption of adverse drugs reporting (ADR) systems in hospitals.","PeriodicalId":12594,"journal":{"name":"GJMS Vol 19, No.1, Jan-Mar 2021","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GJMS Vol 19, No.1, Jan-Mar 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46903/gjms/19.01.943","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The safety of medications is of utmost concern for public health. In developed countries, adverse drug reaction reporting systems are well established, but in low-income and middle-income countries such as Pakistan, these are under-developed and ignored. The objective of this qualitative survey was to explore the adverse drug reaction reporting practices by health care professionals of Karachi, Pakistan. Materials & Methods: Fifteen health care professionals (HCPs), including physicians, nurses and pharmacists from public, semi-private and private tertiary care hospitals were selected using purposive and snowball sampling for semi-structured interviews. Interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim, and were analyzed using Thematic Analysis. Results: The results showed that almost all HCPs have a good understanding of ADR, but did not know the procedures of ADR reporting to the Drug Regulatory Authority of Pakistan (DRAP). Usually, the ADR was manually reported, with few hospitals having an electronic ADR reporting system. Barriers to the ADR reporting included a large influx of illiterate patients, over-burdened staff, lack of financial and technological resources, and ineffective administration. Facilitator to ADR reporting was electronic ADR system. Conclusion: These findings would help the policymakers and health administrators to revise existing policies and devise new ones for the adoption of adverse drugs reporting (ADR) systems in hospitals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴基斯坦卡拉奇卫生保健专业人员药物不良反应报告做法:一项定性调查
背景:药物的安全性是公众最关心的健康问题。在发达国家,药物不良反应报告系统已经建立,但在巴基斯坦等低收入和中等收入国家,这些系统不发达且被忽视。本定性调查的目的是探讨巴基斯坦卡拉奇卫生保健专业人员的药物不良反应报告做法。材料与方法:采用有目的和滚雪球抽样的半结构化访谈方法,从公立、半私立和私立三级医院选择15名卫生保健专业人员(HCPs),包括医生、护士和药剂师。访谈以数字方式记录,逐字转录,并使用专题分析进行分析。结果:结果显示,几乎所有医护人员对ADR有较好的认识,但不知道向巴基斯坦药品监督管理局(DRAP)报告ADR的程序。通常,ADR是手工上报的,很少有医院有电子ADR上报系统。不良反应报告的障碍包括文盲患者大量涌入、工作人员负担过重、缺乏财政和技术资源以及管理不力。促进ADR报告的是电子ADR系统。结论:这些发现有助于决策者和卫生管理者修改现有政策,制定新的政策,促进医院采用药品不良反应报告(ADR)制度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
DEMOGRAPHIC AND CLINICAL PROFILES AND MORTALITY OF ALUMINIUM PHOSPHIDE POISONING CASES IN KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA PROVINCE, PAKISTAN ADVERSE DRUG REACTION REPORTING PRACTICES BY HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS OF KARACHI, PAKISTAN: A QUALITATIVE SURVEY SERUM LEVELS OF OXIDATIVE STRESS PARAMETERS IN POSTMENOPAUSAL VERSUS FERTILE WOMEN OF KUTAHYA CITY, TURKEY HEALTH DIGITALIZATION IS A NEED OF HOUR DISTRIBUTION OF CUTANEOUS LEISHMANIASIS BY SEX, AGE GROUPS AND RESIDENCE IN YEAR 2020 IN CUTANEOUS LEISHMANIASIS POPULATION OF DISTRICT D.I.KHAN, PAKISTAN
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1