Relationship between ABO blood group phenotypes and some cardiovascular risk factors among undergraduate students in Kano Nigeria

I. Mukhtar, Abdulkarim Abdullahi
{"title":"Relationship between ABO blood group phenotypes and some cardiovascular risk factors among undergraduate students in Kano Nigeria","authors":"I. Mukhtar, Abdulkarim Abdullahi","doi":"10.4103/njecp.njecp_21_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Studies have linked ABO phenotypes to cardiovascular diseases (CVDs); however, data on the relationship between ABO phenotypes and CDV risk factors among healthy adults are lacking. Aim: To determine the relationship between ABO phenotypes and CVD risk factors among undergraduate students in Kano, Nigeria. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional descriptive study recruited 150 participants. ABO phenotypes were determined using monoclonal antisera. Serum total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterolwere determined enzymatically, while low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) was calculated using the Friedewald equation. Blood pressure and anthropometric measurements were by standard protocols. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 23.0; P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Mean age of the participants was 23.12 ± 2.97 (17–31) years. The frequency of ABO phenotypes among the participants was: O (39.3%), B (26.0%), A (23.3%), and AB (11.3%). Non-O phenotypes had significantly lower systolic blood pressure (P = 0.050), higher TC (P = 0.023), TG (P = 0.003), and LDL-c (P = 0.050) compared to O phenotypes. Of the non-O phenotypes, A had significantly higher TC compared to B (P = 0.004) and O (P = 0.001); higher TG compared to O (P = 0.001); higher LDL-c compared to B (P = 0.001), AB (P = 0.042), and O (P = 0.006); heavier compared to B (P = 0.012) and O (P = 0.033); and higher hip circumference compared to B (P = 0.022). Conclusion: Non-O phenotypes, especially A phenotypes, had significantly higher mean serum lipids compared to O. ABO phenotypes should be considered in CVD risk stratification.","PeriodicalId":19420,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Journal of Experimental and Clinical Biosciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Journal of Experimental and Clinical Biosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/njecp.njecp_21_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Studies have linked ABO phenotypes to cardiovascular diseases (CVDs); however, data on the relationship between ABO phenotypes and CDV risk factors among healthy adults are lacking. Aim: To determine the relationship between ABO phenotypes and CVD risk factors among undergraduate students in Kano, Nigeria. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional descriptive study recruited 150 participants. ABO phenotypes were determined using monoclonal antisera. Serum total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterolwere determined enzymatically, while low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) was calculated using the Friedewald equation. Blood pressure and anthropometric measurements were by standard protocols. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 23.0; P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Mean age of the participants was 23.12 ± 2.97 (17–31) years. The frequency of ABO phenotypes among the participants was: O (39.3%), B (26.0%), A (23.3%), and AB (11.3%). Non-O phenotypes had significantly lower systolic blood pressure (P = 0.050), higher TC (P = 0.023), TG (P = 0.003), and LDL-c (P = 0.050) compared to O phenotypes. Of the non-O phenotypes, A had significantly higher TC compared to B (P = 0.004) and O (P = 0.001); higher TG compared to O (P = 0.001); higher LDL-c compared to B (P = 0.001), AB (P = 0.042), and O (P = 0.006); heavier compared to B (P = 0.012) and O (P = 0.033); and higher hip circumference compared to B (P = 0.022). Conclusion: Non-O phenotypes, especially A phenotypes, had significantly higher mean serum lipids compared to O. ABO phenotypes should be considered in CVD risk stratification.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼日利亚卡诺市大学生ABO血型表型与心血管危险因素的关系
背景:研究已将ABO表型与心血管疾病(cvd)联系起来;然而,关于健康成人ABO表型与CDV危险因素之间关系的数据缺乏。目的:了解尼日利亚卡诺市大学生ABO表型与心血管疾病危险因素之间的关系。材料和方法:本横断面描述性研究招募了150名参与者。用单克隆抗血清测定ABO表型。酶法测定血清总胆固醇(TC)、甘油三酯(TG)和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇,用Friedewald方程计算低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-c)。血压和人体测量采用标准方案。数据分析采用SPSS 23.0版本;P≤0.05认为有统计学意义。结果:患者平均年龄23.12±2.97(17-31)岁。ABO表型在参与者中的频率为:O (39.3%), B (26.0%), A(23.3%)和AB(11.3%)。与O型表型相比,非O型表型的收缩压明显降低(P = 0.050), TC (P = 0.023)、TG (P = 0.003)和LDL-c (P = 0.050)较高。在非O型中,A型的TC显著高于B型(P = 0.004)和O型(P = 0.001);TG高于0组(P = 0.001);LDL-c高于B组(P = 0.001)、AB组(P = 0.042)和O组(P = 0.006);比B重(P = 0.012),比O重(P = 0.033);臀围高于B组(P = 0.022)。结论:与o型相比,非o型尤其是A型的平均血脂水平明显高于o型。在心血管疾病风险分层中应考虑ABO型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
In vitro analysis and molecular docking of gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy fingerprints of polyherbal mixture reveals significant antidiabetic miture Relationship between ABO blood group phenotypes and some cardiovascular risk factors among undergraduate students in Kano Nigeria Green Coconut Water Supplementation Attenuates Flutamide-induced Testicular Damage in Male Prepubertal Wistar Rats Epidermal inclusion cysts of the clitoris following female genital mutilation: Case series and review of literature Methanolic leaf extract of Dryopteris dilatata reverses kidney injury on streptozotocin-induced diabetic male wistar rats
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1