Comparison of efficacy of 40% mandelic acid with 30% salicylic acid peels in mild-to-moderate acne vulgaris: A randomized study

Rajkiran Takharya, Jude E. Dileep, P. Oudeacoumar, D. Kaliyaperumal, Ilakkia P. Sadasivam, L. Dsouza
{"title":"Comparison of efficacy of 40% mandelic acid with 30% salicylic acid peels in mild-to-moderate acne vulgaris: A randomized study","authors":"Rajkiran Takharya, Jude E. Dileep, P. Oudeacoumar, D. Kaliyaperumal, Ilakkia P. Sadasivam, L. Dsouza","doi":"10.4103/tjd.tjd_106_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Chemical peel is a cosmetic procedure that is becoming a popular modality in treating acne vulgaris (AV). Mandelic acid (MA) is an upcoming peeling agent for AV due to its anti-inflammatory and antibacterial traits. Hence, it is worthwhile to appraise this newer agent’s effectiveness and safety profile and compare it with a more traditional and established peeling agent, salicylic acid (SA), in the treatment of AV. Aims: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of 40% MA with 30% SA peels in south Indian patients suffering from mild-to-moderate facial AV. Materials and Methods: One hundred patients suffering from mild-to-moderate facial AV were distributed randomly into two groups of 50 each, with group A receiving 40% MA peel and group B receiving 30% SA peel at an interval of two weeks for six sessions. The duration of the study was twelve weeks. Clinical pictures and Michaelsson acne scores (MAS) were used to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment objectively. Adverse effects of both the peeling agents were also noted. Statistical Analysis Used: A value of P ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Overall, there was no significant difference in the efficacy between the two peels. However, adverse effects were slightly higher with SA peel. Conclusions: The 40% MA peel was equally effective as 30% SA peel in mild-to-moderate facial AV. However, safety profile and tolerability were better in the MA peel group than the SA peel group.","PeriodicalId":42454,"journal":{"name":"Turk Dermatoloji Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Dermatology","volume":"14 1","pages":"44 - 51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turk Dermatoloji Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tjd.tjd_106_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chemical peel is a cosmetic procedure that is becoming a popular modality in treating acne vulgaris (AV). Mandelic acid (MA) is an upcoming peeling agent for AV due to its anti-inflammatory and antibacterial traits. Hence, it is worthwhile to appraise this newer agent’s effectiveness and safety profile and compare it with a more traditional and established peeling agent, salicylic acid (SA), in the treatment of AV. Aims: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of 40% MA with 30% SA peels in south Indian patients suffering from mild-to-moderate facial AV. Materials and Methods: One hundred patients suffering from mild-to-moderate facial AV were distributed randomly into two groups of 50 each, with group A receiving 40% MA peel and group B receiving 30% SA peel at an interval of two weeks for six sessions. The duration of the study was twelve weeks. Clinical pictures and Michaelsson acne scores (MAS) were used to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment objectively. Adverse effects of both the peeling agents were also noted. Statistical Analysis Used: A value of P ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Overall, there was no significant difference in the efficacy between the two peels. However, adverse effects were slightly higher with SA peel. Conclusions: The 40% MA peel was equally effective as 30% SA peel in mild-to-moderate facial AV. However, safety profile and tolerability were better in the MA peel group than the SA peel group.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
40%扁桃酸与30%水杨酸去皮对轻度至中度寻常性痤疮疗效的比较:一项随机研究
背景:化学去皮是一种美容程序,正在成为治疗寻常痤疮(AV)的一种流行方式。扁桃酸(MA)具有抗炎、抗菌等特性,是一种新兴的AV脱皮剂。因此,有必要评估这种新药物的有效性和安全性,并将其与更传统的脱皮剂水杨酸(SA)进行比较,以治疗AV。目的:本研究的目的是比较40% MA和30% SA在印度南部轻度至中度面部AV患者中的脱皮效果。100例轻度至中度面部AV患者随机分为两组,每组50例,A组接受40% MA剥离,B组接受30% SA剥离,间隔两周,共6次。研究的持续时间为12周。采用临床图片和Michaelsson痤疮评分(MAS)客观评价治疗效果。两种脱皮剂的副作用也被注意到。统计学分析应用:P≤0.05为显著。结果:总体而言,两种换肤方法的疗效无显著差异。然而,SA剥离的副作用略高。结论:在轻度至中度面部AV中,40% MA剥皮与30% SA剥皮的效果相同。然而,MA剥皮组的安全性和耐受性优于SA剥皮组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Keratoacanthoma seen with hidradenitis suppurativa: A case report Evaluating knowledge level about scabies in primary care physicians during the scabies outbreak of Turkey Treatment results with 5-mm surgical excision in nonmelanoma skin cancers: Analysis of 234 cases Randomized control trial of itraconazole in the treatment of dermatophytosis: comparison of three different dose regimens Comparison of efficacy of 40% mandelic acid with 30% salicylic acid peels in mild-to-moderate acne vulgaris: A randomized study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1