The Impact of an Electronic Health Record Intervention on Spirometry Completion in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Christine Wang, Jonathan Siff, Peter J Greco, Edward Warren, J Daryl Thornton, Yasir Tarabichi
{"title":"The Impact of an Electronic Health Record Intervention on Spirometry Completion in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.","authors":"Christine Wang, Jonathan Siff, Peter J Greco, Edward Warren, J Daryl Thornton, Yasir Tarabichi","doi":"10.1080/15412555.2022.2049736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Spirometry is necessary to diagnose chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), yet a large proportion of patients are diagnosed and treated without having received testing. This study explored whether the effects of interventions using the electronic health record (EHR) to target patients diagnosed with COPD without confirmatory spirometry impacted the incidence rates of spirometry referrals and completions. This retrospective before and after study assessed the impact of provider-facing clinical decision support that identified patients who had a diagnosis of COPD but had not received spirometry. Spirometry referrals, completions, and results were ascertained 1.5 years prior to and 1.5 years after the interventions were initiated. Inhaler prescriptions by class were also tallied. There were 10,949 unique patients with a diagnosis of COPD who were eligible for inclusion. 4,895 patients (44.7%) were excluded because they had completed spirometry prior to the cohort start dates. The pre-intervention cohort consisted of 2,622 patients, while the post-intervention cohort had 3,392. Spirometry referral rates pre-intervention were 20.2% compared to 31.6% post-intervention (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Spirometry completion rates rose from 13.2% pre-intervention to 19.3% afterwards (<i>p</i> < 0.001). 61.7% (585 of 948) had no evidence of airflow obstruction. After excluding patients with a diagnosis of asthma, 25.8% (126 of 488) patients who had no evidence of airflow obstruction had prescriptions for long-acting bronchodilators or inhaled steroids. A concerted EHR intervention modestly increased spirometry referral and completion rates in patients with a diagnosis of COPD without prior spirometry and decreased misclassification of disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":43045,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Current Issues and Research In Advertising","volume":"27 1","pages":"142-148"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9202241/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Current Issues and Research In Advertising","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15412555.2022.2049736","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spirometry is necessary to diagnose chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), yet a large proportion of patients are diagnosed and treated without having received testing. This study explored whether the effects of interventions using the electronic health record (EHR) to target patients diagnosed with COPD without confirmatory spirometry impacted the incidence rates of spirometry referrals and completions. This retrospective before and after study assessed the impact of provider-facing clinical decision support that identified patients who had a diagnosis of COPD but had not received spirometry. Spirometry referrals, completions, and results were ascertained 1.5 years prior to and 1.5 years after the interventions were initiated. Inhaler prescriptions by class were also tallied. There were 10,949 unique patients with a diagnosis of COPD who were eligible for inclusion. 4,895 patients (44.7%) were excluded because they had completed spirometry prior to the cohort start dates. The pre-intervention cohort consisted of 2,622 patients, while the post-intervention cohort had 3,392. Spirometry referral rates pre-intervention were 20.2% compared to 31.6% post-intervention (p < 0.001). Spirometry completion rates rose from 13.2% pre-intervention to 19.3% afterwards (p < 0.001). 61.7% (585 of 948) had no evidence of airflow obstruction. After excluding patients with a diagnosis of asthma, 25.8% (126 of 488) patients who had no evidence of airflow obstruction had prescriptions for long-acting bronchodilators or inhaled steroids. A concerted EHR intervention modestly increased spirometry referral and completion rates in patients with a diagnosis of COPD without prior spirometry and decreased misclassification of disease.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电子健康记录干预对慢性阻塞性肺病患者完成肺活量测量的影响。
肺活量测定是诊断慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)的必要手段,但很大一部分患者在未接受肺活量测定的情况下就得到了诊断和治疗。本研究探讨了使用电子健康记录(EHR)对未经肺活量测定确诊的慢性阻塞性肺病患者进行干预是否会影响肺活量测定的转诊率和完成率。这项前后回顾性研究评估了面向医疗服务提供者的临床决策支持的影响,该支持可识别出诊断为慢性阻塞性肺病但未接受肺活量测定的患者。在干预措施启动前 1.5 年和启动后 1.5 年,对肺活量测定的转诊、完成情况和结果进行了确认。此外,还按类别统计了吸入器处方。共有 10949 名诊断为慢性阻塞性肺病的患者符合纳入条件。有 4895 名患者(44.7%)被排除在外,因为他们在队列开始日期之前已经完成了肺活量测定。干预前队列中有 2622 名患者,干预后队列中有 3392 名患者。干预前肺活量测定的转诊率为 20.2%,而干预后为 31.6%(P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
32.40%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
The Lost History of the American Academy of Advertising Exploring Persuasion Knowledge, Identity-Related Media Use, and Ad Skepticism of Black Immigrant and Refugee Adolescents Exploring Anti-Asian Racism Activism on Twitter during the Early Era of COVID-19 Hate Crimes: Implications for Marketers’ Social Purpose Communication Strategy Corporate Account As a New Endorser Developing Parasocial Relationships with Customers Modeling the Effects of Streamer Characteristics and Platform Affordances in Livestreaming E-Commerce: A Mixed-Methods Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1