An Exploratory Analysis of Social Science Graduate Education in Data Management and Data Sharing

A. Doonan, Dharma Akmon, E. Cosby
{"title":"An Exploratory Analysis of Social Science Graduate Education in Data Management and Data Sharing","authors":"A. Doonan, Dharma Akmon, E. Cosby","doi":"10.2218/IJDC.V15I1.671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Effective data management and data sharing are crucial components of the research lifecycle, yet evidence suggests that many social science graduate programs are not providing training in these areas. The current exploratory study assesses how U.S. masters and doctoral programs in the social sciences include formal, non-formal, and informal training in data management and sharing. We conducted a survey of 150 graduate programs across six social science disciplines, and used a mix of closed and open-ended questions focused on the extent to which programs provide such training and exposure. Results from our survey suggested a deficit of formal training in both data management and data sharing, limited non-formal training, and cursory informal exposure to these topics. Utilizing the results of our survey, we conducted a syllabus analysis to further explore the formal and non-formal content of graduate programs beyond self-report. Our syllabus analysis drew from an expanded seven social science disciplines for a total of 140 programs. The syllabus analysis supported our prior findings that formal and non-formal inclusion of data management and data sharing training is not common practice. Overall, in both the survey and syllabi study we found a lack of both formal and non-formal training on data management and data sharing. Our findings have implications for data repository staff and data service professionals as they consider their methods for encouraging data sharing and prepare for the needs of data depositors. These results can also inform the development and structuring of graduate education in the social sciences, so that researchers are trained early in data management and sharing skills and are able to benefit from making their data available as early in their careers as possible.","PeriodicalId":87279,"journal":{"name":"International journal of digital curation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of digital curation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2218/IJDC.V15I1.671","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Effective data management and data sharing are crucial components of the research lifecycle, yet evidence suggests that many social science graduate programs are not providing training in these areas. The current exploratory study assesses how U.S. masters and doctoral programs in the social sciences include formal, non-formal, and informal training in data management and sharing. We conducted a survey of 150 graduate programs across six social science disciplines, and used a mix of closed and open-ended questions focused on the extent to which programs provide such training and exposure. Results from our survey suggested a deficit of formal training in both data management and data sharing, limited non-formal training, and cursory informal exposure to these topics. Utilizing the results of our survey, we conducted a syllabus analysis to further explore the formal and non-formal content of graduate programs beyond self-report. Our syllabus analysis drew from an expanded seven social science disciplines for a total of 140 programs. The syllabus analysis supported our prior findings that formal and non-formal inclusion of data management and data sharing training is not common practice. Overall, in both the survey and syllabi study we found a lack of both formal and non-formal training on data management and data sharing. Our findings have implications for data repository staff and data service professionals as they consider their methods for encouraging data sharing and prepare for the needs of data depositors. These results can also inform the development and structuring of graduate education in the social sciences, so that researchers are trained early in data management and sharing skills and are able to benefit from making their data available as early in their careers as possible.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社科研究生数据管理与数据共享教育探析
有效的数据管理和数据共享是研究生命周期的关键组成部分,然而有证据表明,许多社会科学研究生课程没有提供这些领域的培训。当前的探索性研究评估了美国社会科学硕士和博士课程如何包括数据管理和共享方面的正式、非正式和非正式培训。我们对六个社会科学学科的150个研究生项目进行了调查,并使用了封闭式和开放式问题的组合,重点关注项目提供此类培训和接触的程度。我们的调查结果表明,在数据管理和数据共享方面缺乏正规培训,非正规培训有限,对这些主题的非正式接触也很粗略。利用调查结果,我们进行了教学大纲分析,以进一步探索研究生课程中自我报告之外的正式和非正式内容。我们的教学大纲分析从七个社会科学学科扩展到总共140个项目。教学大纲分析支持了我们之前的发现,即正式和非正式的数据管理和数据共享培训并不常见。总体而言,在调查和教学大纲研究中,我们发现在数据管理和数据共享方面缺乏正式和非正式的培训。我们的研究结果对数据存储库工作人员和数据服务专业人员具有启示意义,因为他们考虑鼓励数据共享的方法,并为数据存款人的需求做好准备。这些结果还可以为社会科学研究生教育的发展和结构提供信息,以便研究人员在数据管理和共享技能方面得到早期培训,并能够在其职业生涯中尽早提供数据,从而受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Reproducible and Attributable Materials Science Curation Practices: A Case Study Trusted Research Environments: Analysis of Characteristics and Data Availability Preserving Secondary Knowledge Factors Influencing Perceptions of Trust in Data Infrastructures Assessing Quality Variations in Early Career Researchers’ Data Management Plans
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1