Research on emissions inventory for rice straw open burning in An Giang province

P. Thao
{"title":"Research on emissions inventory for rice straw open burning in An Giang province","authors":"P. Thao","doi":"10.31814/stce.nuce2019-13(1)-10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rice straw open burning is the most common form of agricultural by-product treatment in developing countries. Contaminated pollutants pollute the environment, badly affect human's health and contribute to the increase of greenhouse gases that impact climate change. This research was carried out to estimate the amount of rice straw produced, a seasonal burning rate and the modified combustion efficiency (MCE) from field-based rice straw open burning by field sampling method, field survey and quick measurement; the inventory is based on emission factors. The results show that 62% of respondents use rice straw for different purposes such as cattle feed, selling, composting... 38% respondents do not use for any purposes. The main disposal method is open burning. Open burning rate is different in each cultivative season. It was 36.36%, in winter-spring crop,  49.32% in summer-autumn crop and 40% in winter-autumn crop. In 2017, total CO2 emissions from open burning were the highest compared with two other pollutants. It was nearly 5.7 million tons and followed by CO with 135.1 thousand tons. The other pollutants emitted from open burning were PM2.5 (50.4 thousand tons), PM10 (14.4 thousand tons), SO2 (7.78 thousand tons), NO2 (0.27 thousand tons) per year. The inventory results show that rice straw open burning in An Giang has been affecting on the quality of the air environment, landscape and reducing the traffic vision; especially fine dust (PM2.5) greatly affects to local people’s health. If all surplus rice straw is used for energy production, it can help not only reduce fossil fuel use, but also reduce the amount of pollutants generated by open burning. This is a win-win solution that should be paid attention by the local authorities to come up with appropriate incentives. \nKeywords: emission inventory; rice straw; open burning; emissions. \nReceived 20 December 2018, Revised 25 January 2019, Accepted 28 January 2019","PeriodicalId":17004,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Science and Technology in Civil Engineering (STCE) - NUCE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Science and Technology in Civil Engineering (STCE) - NUCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31814/stce.nuce2019-13(1)-10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rice straw open burning is the most common form of agricultural by-product treatment in developing countries. Contaminated pollutants pollute the environment, badly affect human's health and contribute to the increase of greenhouse gases that impact climate change. This research was carried out to estimate the amount of rice straw produced, a seasonal burning rate and the modified combustion efficiency (MCE) from field-based rice straw open burning by field sampling method, field survey and quick measurement; the inventory is based on emission factors. The results show that 62% of respondents use rice straw for different purposes such as cattle feed, selling, composting... 38% respondents do not use for any purposes. The main disposal method is open burning. Open burning rate is different in each cultivative season. It was 36.36%, in winter-spring crop,  49.32% in summer-autumn crop and 40% in winter-autumn crop. In 2017, total CO2 emissions from open burning were the highest compared with two other pollutants. It was nearly 5.7 million tons and followed by CO with 135.1 thousand tons. The other pollutants emitted from open burning were PM2.5 (50.4 thousand tons), PM10 (14.4 thousand tons), SO2 (7.78 thousand tons), NO2 (0.27 thousand tons) per year. The inventory results show that rice straw open burning in An Giang has been affecting on the quality of the air environment, landscape and reducing the traffic vision; especially fine dust (PM2.5) greatly affects to local people’s health. If all surplus rice straw is used for energy production, it can help not only reduce fossil fuel use, but also reduce the amount of pollutants generated by open burning. This is a win-win solution that should be paid attention by the local authorities to come up with appropriate incentives. Keywords: emission inventory; rice straw; open burning; emissions. Received 20 December 2018, Revised 25 January 2019, Accepted 28 January 2019
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
安江省秸秆露天焚烧排放清查研究
在发展中国家,露天焚烧秸秆是最常见的农业副产品处理方式。被污染的污染物污染环境,严重影响人类健康,并导致影响气候变化的温室气体增加。采用田间取样法、实地调查法和快速测量法,对秸秆露天焚烧的秸秆产生量、季节燃烧速率和改良燃烧效率(MCE)进行了估算;该清单是基于排放因素。结果显示,62%的受访者将稻草用于不同目的,如牛饲料、销售、堆肥……38%的受访者不将其用于任何目的。主要的处理方法是露天焚烧。不同栽培季节的露天燃烧率不同。冬春作物为36.36%,夏秋作物为49.32%,冬秋作物为40%。2017年,与其他两种污染物相比,露天燃烧的二氧化碳排放总量最高。近570万吨,其次是CO,为13.51万吨。露天焚烧排放的其他污染物为PM2.5(50.4万吨)、PM10(14.4万吨)、SO2(778万吨)、NO2(0.27万吨)。调查结果表明,安江地区秸秆露天焚烧已对空气环境质量、景观质量产生影响,并降低了交通视线;特别是细颗粒物(PM2.5)对当地人民的健康影响很大。如果所有多余的稻草都用于能源生产,不仅可以帮助减少化石燃料的使用,还可以减少露天燃烧产生的污染物。这是一个双赢的解决方案,应该引起地方当局的注意,并提出适当的激励措施。关键词:排放清单;稻草;露天焚烧;排放。2018年12月20日收稿,2019年1月25日修订,2019年1月28日收稿
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Xếp hạng rủi ro tai nạn lao động trong thi công phần thân nhà cao tầng Lựa chọn tiết diện dầm thép hợp lý với một số thuật toán tối ưu trong thiết kế cầu dầm thép chữ I liên hợp Chẩn đoán sự suy giảm độ cứng trong kết cấu dầm thông qua dữ liệu đường ảnh hưởng của chuyển vị Nghiên cứu áp dụng QCVN 06:2021/BXD trong thiết kế hệ thống hút khói cho tòa nhà cao tầng ở Việt Nam Nghiên cứu xác định thời gian tắt dần sau động đất trong chuỗi tọa độ GNSS liên tục
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1