Choice of Aspect in a Russian Modal Construction

B. Bernasconi
{"title":"Choice of Aspect in a Russian Modal Construction","authors":"B. Bernasconi","doi":"10.7557/6.6340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Russian aspect has been studied by many scholars over the decades within different perspectives and from different points of view, but its usage still presents challenges and controversial points. Within the cognitive paradigm, Janda and colleagues (Janda and Reynolds 2019; Janda et al. 2019) have recently demonstrated that the choice of aspect in Russian is not always determined by context but is relatively open to construal. In particular, among the cases that are open to construal, modal constructions figure prominently. In this article I present two quantitative studies on the modal construction приходиться/прийтись + infinitive, ‘have to’, with the aim of providing more evidence for their finding. The hypothesis is that the aspect of the infinitive is not fully determined by grammatical context but, to some extent, is open to construal. The first study is an analysis of corpus data taken from the Russian National Corpus. A dataset of 447 examples was annotated for several factors  in order to single out variables that significantly interacts with aspect choice in the infinitive. The second study consists of an experiment with Russian native speakers. An acceptability judgement survey was submitted to 110 informants that had to rate both aspects in the infinitive in the same contexts. In both cases statistical methods were used to analyse the data. Results to the corpus analysis led to the conclusion that no contextual factor significantly influences the choice of aspect, while the answers to the survey demonstrated that both aspects are rated as grammatically acceptable by the majority of the native speakers.","PeriodicalId":30040,"journal":{"name":"Poljarnyj Vestnik Norwegian Journal of Slavic Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Poljarnyj Vestnik Norwegian Journal of Slavic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7557/6.6340","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Russian aspect has been studied by many scholars over the decades within different perspectives and from different points of view, but its usage still presents challenges and controversial points. Within the cognitive paradigm, Janda and colleagues (Janda and Reynolds 2019; Janda et al. 2019) have recently demonstrated that the choice of aspect in Russian is not always determined by context but is relatively open to construal. In particular, among the cases that are open to construal, modal constructions figure prominently. In this article I present two quantitative studies on the modal construction приходиться/прийтись + infinitive, ‘have to’, with the aim of providing more evidence for their finding. The hypothesis is that the aspect of the infinitive is not fully determined by grammatical context but, to some extent, is open to construal. The first study is an analysis of corpus data taken from the Russian National Corpus. A dataset of 447 examples was annotated for several factors  in order to single out variables that significantly interacts with aspect choice in the infinitive. The second study consists of an experiment with Russian native speakers. An acceptability judgement survey was submitted to 110 informants that had to rate both aspects in the infinitive in the same contexts. In both cases statistical methods were used to analyse the data. Results to the corpus analysis led to the conclusion that no contextual factor significantly influences the choice of aspect, while the answers to the survey demonstrated that both aspects are rated as grammatically acceptable by the majority of the native speakers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
俄语情态结构的体选择
几十年来,许多学者从不同的角度和不同的角度对俄语方面进行了研究,但它的使用仍然存在挑战和争议点。在认知范式中,Janda及其同事(Janda and Reynolds 2019;Janda等人(2019)最近证明,俄语中方面的选择并不总是由语境决定的,而是相对开放的解释。特别是,在可以解释的情况下,情态结构占据了突出的位置。在这篇文章中,我提出了两个关于情态结构приходиться/прийтись +不定式“have to”的定量研究,目的是为他们的发现提供更多证据。该假说认为,不定式的词形并不完全由语法语境决定,而是在某种程度上可以解释。第一项研究是对取自俄罗斯国家语料库的语料库数据进行分析。一个包含447个例子的数据集对几个因素进行了注释,以便挑出与不定式中aspect选择显着相互作用的变量。第二个研究包括一个以俄语为母语的人的实验。一份可接受性判断调查提交给110名被调查者,他们必须在相同的语境中对不定式的两个方面进行评分。在这两种情况下,统计方法被用来分析数据。语料库分析的结果表明,语境因素对词性的选择没有显著影响,而调查的答案表明,大多数母语人士认为这两个词性在语法上都是可以接受的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Ljubov’ drug k drugu or ljubov’ k drug drugu? Choice of Aspect in a Russian Modal Construction Spot the Miner Svalbard Studies Health Through the Space Lens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1